The concept of social capital has revitalized the study of civil society. Alexis de Tocqueville's examination of 19th-century America is a major source of inspiration for much of this work. Tocqueville's analysis has been used to help support the idea that a strong civil society is crucial to democratic success. A reconsideration of Tocqueville's analysis, and, more important, of his American case, however, suggests that an active civil society is not an unalloyed good for democratic politics. A strong society can be not only a support but also a threat to democracy and liberal democratic ideals. One's evaluation of the health of democratic polities must depend on a study of the effects of political institutions and constitutional structures, as well as of civil society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aron, R. (1968). Main currents in sociological thought: Volume 1, Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, Tocqueville, and the sociologists and the Revolution of 1848. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
2.
Benson, L. (1964). The concept of Jacksonian democracy: New York as a test case. New York: Atheneum.
3.
Cole, A. C. (1971). The irrepressible conflict, 1850-1865. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
4.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Davis, D. B. (1975). The problem of slavery in the age of revolution, 1770-1823. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
Finkelman, P. (1987). Slavery and the constitutional convention: Making a covenant with death. In R. Beeman, S. Botein, & E. C. Carter II (Eds.), Beyond confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American national identity (pp. 188-225). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
7.
Foley, M. W. , & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7, 38-52.
8.
Formisano, R. P. (1983). The transformation of political culture: Massachusetts parties, 1790s-1840s. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Huston, J. L. (1993). The American revolutionaries, the political economy of aristocracy, and the American concept of the distribution of wealth, 1765-1900. American Historical Review, 98, 1079-1105.
10.
Johnson, P. E. (1978). A shopkeeper's millennium: Society and revivals in Rochester, New York, 1815-1837. New York: Hill and Wang.
11.
Lerner, R. (1968). The Supreme Court as republican schoolmaster. In P. B. Kurland (Ed.), The Supreme Court review, 1967 (pp. 127-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Norton, A. (1986). Alternative Americas: A reading of antebellum political culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Pessen, E. (1985). Jacksonian America: Society, personality and politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
17.
Potter, D. (1976). The impending crisis, 1848-1861. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Putnam, R. D. (1993a). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Putnam, R. D. (1993b). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
20.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
21.
Rodgers, D. T. (1988). Of prophets and prophecy. In S. S. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Reconsidering Tocqueville's Democracy in America (pp. 192-206). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
Rogin, M. (1987). Ronald Reagon, the movie, and other episodes in political demonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Seligman, A. B. (1992). The idea of civil society. New York: Free Press.
24.
Siedentop, L. (1979). Two liberal traditions. In A. Ryan (Ed.), The idea of liberty: Essays in honour of Isaiah Berlin (pp. 153-174). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Skocpol, T. , & Finegold, K. (1982). State capacity and economic intervention in the early new deal. Political Science Quarterly, 97, 255-278.
26.
Smith-Rosenberg, C. (1986). Disorderly conduct: Visions of gender in Victorian America. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Tarrow, S. (1996). Making social science work across space and time: A critical reflection on Robert Putnam'sMaking Democracy Work. American Political Science Review, 90, 389-397.
28.
Taylor, C. (1990). Modes of civil society. Public Culture, 3, 95-118.
29.
Tocqueville, A. de. (1969). Democracy in America (Edited by J. P. Meyer). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
30.
Tyrrell, I. R. (1979). Sobering up: From temperance to prohibition in antebellum America, 1800-1860. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
31.
Walzer, M. (1992). The civil society argument. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community (pp. 89-107). New York: Verso.
32.
Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant sects and the spirit of capitalism. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 302-322). New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Wilentz, S. (1988). Many democratics: On Tocqueville and Jacksonian America. In S. S. Eisenstadt (Ed.), Reconsidering Tocqueville's Democracy in America (pp. 207-228). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
