This article investigates the problems that confront academe and suggests that faculty work has changed so profoundly in recent years that tenure is no longer sufficient and/or necessary. The author argues that intellectual freedom and accountability are competing demands that must be met simultaneously. He reviews the problems that exist, how tenure exacerbates those problems, and how an expanded faculty career profile might be one way to solve some of the vexing problems that confront colleges and universities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of University Professors (AAUP) . (1973). On the imposition of tenure quotas. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
2.
Annunziato, F. R. (1995). Directory of faculty contracts and bargaining agents in institutions of higher education (Vol. 21). New York: National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, Baruch College, City University of New York.
3.
Arden, E. (1995). Is tenure “obsolete”? An opinion and a survey. Academe, 81, 38-39.
4.
Batia v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, 79 F.3d 717 (8th Cir. 1996).
5.
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972).
6.
Bowen, H. R. , & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. London: Oxford University Press.
7.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8.
Brammer, J. E. (1991). Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The realization of Title VII's legislative intent. Journal of College and University Law, 17(4), 551-563.
9.
Breneman, D. W. (1993). Higher education: On a collision course with new realities (Rep. No. ED379975). Boston: American Student Assistance.
10.
Breneman, D. W. (1997). Alternatives to tenure for the next generation of academics. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
11.
Brine v. University of Northern Iowa, 90 F.3d 271 (1996).
12.
Cartter, A. M. , & Solmon, L. (1975). Implications for faculty. Change, 8(8), 37-38.
13.
Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College, 883 F. Supp. 1407, 92 F. 3rd 968 (1996).
14.
Collective bargaining agreement between Board of Regents, State University System of Florida and the United Faculty of Florida, 1995-1998 [On-line]. Available from: http://mailer.fsu.edu/∼uffinfo/agreement/boruff98.asc.
15.
Dill, D. D. (1974). Tenure quotas: Their impact and an alternative. Liberal Education, 60(4), 467-477.
16.
Eddy, E. D. , & Morrill, R. L. (1975). Living with tenure without quotas. Liberal Education, 61(3), 399-417.
17.
Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr, and Solis-Cohen. 983 F.2d 509, cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 88 (1992).
18.
The faculty reward system in public universities. (1993). Columbus: Ohio Legislative Office of Education Oversight.
19.
Finnegan, D. E. (1993). Segmentation in the academic labor market: Hiring cohorts in comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education, 64(6), 621-656.
20.
Fisher v. Vassar College, 852 F. Supp. 1193, 70 F. 3rd 1420 (1995).
21.
Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 293-305.
22.
Gappa, J. M. , & Leslie, D. W. (1993). The invisible faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Gappa, J. M. , & Leslie, D. W. (1997). Two faculties or one? The conundrum of part-timers in a bifurcated work force. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
24.
Garbarino, J. W. (1975). Faculty bargaining: Change and conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Harvey, J. , & Immerwahr, J. (1995). Public perceptions of higher education: On Main Street and in the boardroom. Educational Record, 76(4), 51-55.
26.
Higher Education Coordinating Council/Roxbury Community College v. Massachusetts Teachers Association/Massachusetts Community College Council, 666 N. E. 2d 479 (1996).
27.
House votes on U funding, steam plant. (1996, February 19). The Minnesota Daily Online [On-line]. Available from: http://www.daily.umn.edu.
28.
Huber, R. M. (1992). How professors play the cat guarding the cream: Why we're paying more and getting less in higher education. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
29.
Keast Commission . (1973). Faculty tenure: A report and recommendations by the Commission on Academic Tenure in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Leslie, D. W. (1987). The common law of the academic profession: An assessment. Review of Higher Education, 10(4), 295-318.
31.
Leslie, D. W. , & Fretwell, E. K., Jr. (1996). Wise moves in hard times: Creating and managing resilient colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Magner, D. (1997, June 20). Fierce battle over tenure at University of Minnesota ends quietly. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A14.
33.
Massy, W. F. , & Wilger, A. K. (1992). Productivity in postsecondary education: A new approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 361-376.
34.
McDonnell-Douglas v. Green, 93 S. Ct. 1817 (1973).
35.
McPherson, M. S. , & Winston, G. C. (1993). The economics of academic tenure: A relational perspective. In M. S. McPherson (Ed.), Paying the piper: Productivity, incentives, and financing in U.S. higher education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Milbauer v. Keppler, 644 F. Supp. 201 (1986).
37.
Mingle, J. R. (1992). Faculty work and the cost/quality/access collision. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers, Education Commission of the States.
38.
Mueller v. University of Minnesota, 855 F. 2d 555 (1988).
39.
Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972).
40.
Piarkowski v. Illinois Community College District 515, 759 F. 2d 625 (1985).
41.
Purisch v. Tennessee Technological University, 76 F3d 1414 (1996).
42.
Ray v. Wilmington College, 667 N. E. 2d 39 (1995).
43.
Scallet v. Rosenblum, 911 F. Supp. 999 (1996).
44.
Schneider v. Northwestern University, 925 F. Supp. 1347 (1996).
45.
Staples, B. (1997, June 29). The end of tenure? When colleges turn to migrant labor. The New York Times, p. E14.
46.
Stastny v. Board of Trustees, 647 P. 2d 496, cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1070 (1983).
47.
State Council for Higher Education in Virginia. (1996, November 11). Council notes [On-line]. Available from: http://www.schev.edu/wumedia/cnnov96.html.
48.
Summary of various post-tenure review policies, University of Texas System, Exhibit C [On-line]. (1996, November). Available from: http://platinum.utsystem.edu/news/exhibitc.htm.
49.
Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957).
50.
Taggart v. Drake University, 549 N.W.2d 796 (1996).
51.
U. of Minnesota regents approve new tenure code [On-line]. (1997, June 13). Available from: http://www.umn.edu/urelate/newsservice/newsreleases/tenures.html.
52.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics . (1993). 1993 national survey of postsecondary faculty. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
Wilson, R. (1997, June 6). Women lose tenure bids despite backing from departments. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A10.
54.
Wirsing v. Board of Regents of the University of Colorado, 739 F. Supp. 551, cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 1264 (1990).
55.
Zahavy v. University of Minnesota, 544 N.W.2d 32 (1996).
