This study examines the narrative strategies used by Bill Clinton in his 1992 and 1996 campaign biography videos. Both videos address similar themes, utilize similar aesthetic strategies, and even repeat key rhetorical structures. In 1996, Clinton substitutes America for Hope as the key organizing symbol of his biography, thereby undermining the liberal Democratic perspective central to The Man From Hope. Instead he offers an image of America that foregrounds traditional Republican values and only makes oblique references to values typically held by Democrats. In doing so, the video biography re-presents Clinton as a moderate, in a creatively ambiguous treatment of the president that seems designed to appeal to a politically diverse America.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carlson, M. (1992, July 27). Bill's big bash. Time, pp. 34-38, 43.
2.
Clinton video now an infomercial. (1992, August 24). The New York Times, pp. D7.
3.
Cooper, M. (1992, July 27). Words and pictures larger than life. U.S. News & World Report, pp. 4-5.
4.
Cooper, M. (1996, September 9). The Arkansas impresarios. New Republic, pp. 26-28.
5.
Donlon, B., & Johnson, P. (1992, July 16). Networks dash Linda Bloodworth-Thomason's “Hope.”USA Today, pp. 3D.
6.
Feirstein, B. (1992, August 8). Clinton/Gore: Two from the TV generation. TV Guide, pp. 14-17.
7.
Graham, J. (1992, July 28). Doing double duty for CBS and Clinton. USA Today, pp. 1D, 3D.
8.
Grimes, W. (1992, July 27). Film tribute to Clinton focuses on simple values. The New York Times, pp. A11.
9.
Guarino, C. (Executive Producer). (1992, July 17). Interview with W. Schneider. Inside Politics. Atlanta, GA: CNN.
10.
Haithman, D. (1992, July 25). Designing presidential politics. Los Angeles Times, pp. F1, F8-F9.
11.
Hertzbe, H. (1992, August 10). New York diarist. New Republic, pp. 42.
12.
James, C. (1996, August 30). The Democrats: The images. The New York Times, pp. A20.
13.
Johnson, P. (1992, November 11). Relationship forged in Arkansas. USA Today, pp. A1-A2.
14.
Jordan, G. (1992, July 17). A video portrait “with all the warts.”Newsday, pp. 26.
15.
Koehl, C., & Howard, L. (1996, September 2). Taking the high road. Newsweek, pp. 6.
16.
Kolbert, E. (1992, April 23). The ad campaign, Clinton: The candidate's biography. The New York Times, pp. A22.
17.
Locin, M. (1992, October 30). Clinton resurrects film to remind voters of his roots, public service. Chicago Tribune, pp. 16.
18.
Mackey-Kallis, S. (1991). Spectator desire and narrative closure: The Reagan 18-minute political film. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 308-314.
19.
Mashberg, T. (1992, November 29). Hollywood romances the new administration. The Boston Globe, pp. 1, 28.
20.
Masters, K. (1993, January 4). Four pals in their prime time. Washington Post, pp. C1, C4.
21.
Morreale, J. (1991a). “A New Beginning”: A textual frame analysis of the political campaign film. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
Morreale, J. (1991b). The political campaign film: Epideictic rhetoric in a documentary frame. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising. Volume 2: Signs, codes and images (pp. 187-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Morreale, J. (1993). The presidential campaign film: A critical history. Westport, CT: Praeger.
24.
Morreale, J. (1994). American self images and the presidential campaign film, 1964-1992. In A. H. Miller & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), Presidential campaigns and American self images (pp. 19-39). Boulder, CO: Westview.
25.
Murphy, M. (1993, January 16). Bill & Hillary & Harry & Linda. TV Guide, pp. 30-34.
26.
Noonan, P. (1992, July 27). Behind enemy lines. Newsweek, pp. 32-33.
27.
Proctor, D. E. (1991). Enacting political culture. New York: Praeger.
28.
Proffitt, S. (1992, November 22). Linda Bloodworth-Thomason [interview]. Los Angeles Times, pp. M3.
29.
Raban, J. (1992, August 30). Bill Clinton, simplified. Los Angeles Times Magazine, pp. 12-14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26-27, 44, 46.
30.
Rochlin, M. (1992, September 27). The prime time of Linda Bloodworth-Thomason. Los Angeles Times Magazine, pp. 20-22, 42-43, 46-47.
31.
Rosteck, T. (1994). The intertextuality of “The Man From Hope”: Bill Clinton as person, as persona, as star? In S. A. Smith (Ed.), Bill Clinton on stump, state, and stage (pp. 201-222). Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.
32.
Rous, G. L. , & Lee, D. E. (1978). Freedom and equality: Two values of political orientation. Journal of Communication, 28, 45-51.
33.
Simons, H. W. , & Stewart, D. J. (1991). Network coverage of video politics: “A New Beginning” in the limits of criticism. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising. Volume 2: Signs, codes and images (pp. 203-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Simons, H. W. , Stewart, D. J., & Harvey, D. (1989). Effects of network treatments on perceptions of a political campaign film: Can rhetorical criticism make a difference?Communication Quarterly, 371, 184-198.
35.
Smith, L. D. (1994). The New York convention: Bill Clinton and “A Place Called Hope.” In S. A. Smith (Ed.), Bill Clinton on stump, state, and stage (pp. 201-222). Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.
36.
Timmerman, D. (1996). The 1992 presidential candidate films: The contrasting narratives of George Bush and Bill Clinton. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 26, 364-373.
37.
Weisberg, J. (1992, November 2). Southern exposure. New Republic, pp. 13-15.
38.
Wilkie, C. (1992, August 13). Retrieving a political past. The Boston Globe, pp. 20.
39.
Wolcott, J. (1992, October 12). Designing couple. The New Yorker, pp. 102-104.
40.
Yardley, R. (1996, September 11). Chelsea goes public. News & Record, pp. A13.
