Over the past couple of decades, research in organizational sociology has shifted away from the contextual richness of action perspectives toward more structuralist paradigms. DiMaggio and Powell's distinction between what they label the “old” and “new” institutionalisms highlights this general trend. The present authors offer a critical review of this generational paradigm debate among institutional theorists and challenge DiMaggio and Powell's assertion that the new should replace the old. The present authors advocate a reconciliation between these theoretical currents that would provide a more balanced approach to the action-structure duality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J. C. , & Smith, P. (1993). The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory and Society, 22, 151-207.
2.
Barnett, W. P. , & Carroll, G. R. (1987). Competition and commensalism among early telephone companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 400-421.
3.
Berger, P. L. , & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Viva la crise! For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society, 17, 773-787.
5.
Burrell, G. , & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
6.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9.
DiMaggio, P. J. , & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
10.
DiMaggio, P. J. , & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Hughes, E. C. (1936). The ecological aspect of institutions. American Sociological Review, 1, 180-189.
13.
Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164-182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Meyer, J. W. , & Hannan, M. T. (1979). National development and the world system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Meyer, J. W. , Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century. Washington, DC: Falmer.
16.
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: Random House.
17.
Salancik, G. R. , & Leblebici, H. (1988). Variety and form in organizing transactions: A generative grammar of organization. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 6, pp. 1-34). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
18.
Scott, R. W. , & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Selznick, P. (1965). TVA and the grass roots. New York: Harper & Row. (Originally published 1949)
21.
Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
22.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1990). Information and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Thomas, G. , Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). Institutional structure: Constituting state, society and the individual. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
White, H. C. (1992). Identity and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
27.
Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
28.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
29.
Zucker, L. G. (1988). Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 23-49). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
