The Curriculum,the Students,and the World

Abstract

The author recommends increased emphasis on interethnic conflict around the world as part of an education in pluralism. Educators have been set the task of overcoming intolerance and heading off conflict in an increasingly diverse society. A widespread response has been to require students to study other cultures and evaluate them in relativist terms to achieve a tolerant pluralism. This “way of life” approach tends to essentialize culture and inhibit the consideration of interactions between societies or of conflicts within them. By contrast, an approach focusing on conflict and context rather than, or in addition to, studying ways of life would be more effective in fostering intergroup understanding. Instead of relativizing, students would face difficult issues and make judgments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Civil Rights Act. (1964). Public law 88-352, 78 Stat 241.

Hart Cellar Immigration and Nationality Act. (1954). Public law 89-236, 79 Stat 911.

Rees-Miller, J. (1995). Linguistic features of disagreement in face to face encounters in university settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, SUNY at Stony Brook, Department of Linguistics.

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

State University of New York at Stony Brook. (1995-1997). Undergraduate Bulletin.

Ueda, R. (1994). Postwar immigrant America: A social history. Boston/New York: Bedford Books of St. Martin's.

Voting Rights Act. (1965). Public law 89-110, 79 Stat 437.

Williams, J. A. (1994). Classroom in conflict: Teaching controversial subjects in a diverse society. Albany: State University of New York Press.