Family Harmony or Individual Protection?

Abstract

Domestic violence situations create tough choices between protecting an individual's safety and fostering family harmony and autonomy. Using a sample of 157 adult residents of Georgia, this study examines how the public wants the police and court to handle domestic violence situations. Respondents read a detailed story about a domestic violence situation and then recommended how the police and court should handle the situation. The majority of respondents wanted the police and the courts to provide referrals to marriage counseling; only 26% of the respondents recommended arrest when the wife had moderately severe injuries. Respondents based their preference for arrest or informal methods on their fairness and on their effectiveness at reducing conflict. These findings suggest that the public may still place more importance on rehabilitative justice than on retributive justice. Moreover, the public recognizes the victim's need for protection but still places much importance on family autonomy and harmony. Practical implications and future research directions are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell, D. J. , & Bell, S. L. (1991). The victim offender relationship as a determinate factor in police dispositions of family violence incidence: A replication study. Policing & Society, 1, 225-237.

Berk, R. (1993). Arrest is the best we can do. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loeske (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Breci, M. G. , & Murphy, J. E. (1992). What do citizens want police to do at domestics: Enforce the law or provide services? American Journal of Police, 11(3), 53-68.

Buzawa, E. S. , & Buzawa, C. G. (1993). The scientific evidence is not conclusive arrest is no panacea. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 337-356). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Chambliss, W. J. (1973). Functional and conflict theories of crime. New York: MSS Modular.

Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

Ellis, D. (1993). Family courts, marital conflict mediation, and wife assaults. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault (pp. 165-187). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Ewing, C. P. , & Aubrey, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some realities about the myths. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 257-264.

Ferraro, K. (1993). Cops, courts, and woman battering. In P. B. Bart & E. G. Moran (Eds.), Violence against women: The bloody footprints. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Ford, D. A. , & Regoli, M. J. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: Process, problems, and effects. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault (pp. 127-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

11.

Frieze, I. H. , & Browne, A. (1989). Violence in marriage. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence (pp. 163-218). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Gottfredson, S. D. , Warner, B. D. , & Taylor, R. B. (1988). Conflict and consensus about criminal justice in Maryland. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Survey from five countries (pp. 178-202). Brookfield, VT: Gower.

13.

Greene, E. , Raitz, A. , & Linbblad, H. (1989). Juror's knowledge of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 105-125.

14.

Hilton, N. Z. (1993). Police intervention and public opinion. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assaults (pp. 37-61). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

15.

Hirschel, J. D. , & Hutchinson, I. (1991). Police-preferred arrest policies. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

16.

Robinson, P. H. , & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, & blame. Boulder, CO: Westview.

17.

Stalans, L. J. , & Finn, M. A. (1995). How novice and experienced officers interpret wife assualts: Normative and efficiency frames. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 287-321.

18.

Stalans, L. J. , & Lurigio, A. J. (1995a). Responding to domestic violence against women. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 387-398.

19.

Stalans, L. J. , & Lurigio, A. J. (1995b). Public preferences for the court's handling of domestic violence situations. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 399-413.

20.

Teplin, L. A. (1984). Managing disorder: Police handling of the mentally ill. In L. A. Teplin (Ed.), Mental health and criminal justice (pp. 157-176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.