Chambliss, W. J. (1973). Functional and conflict theories of crime. New York: MSS Modular Publications.
2.
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). London: The Free Press of Glencoe.
3.
Doble, J. (1987). Crime and punishment: The public's view. New York. Prepared by The Public Agenda Foundation for the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
4.
Doob, A. N. , & Roberts, J. V. (1984). Social psychology, social attitudes, and attitudes toward sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science Review, 16, 26-80.
5.
Durham, A. M., III. (1993). Public opinion regarding sentences for crime: Does it exist?Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 1-11.
6.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Free Press.
7.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
8.
Finkel, N. J. (1990). Capital felony-murder, objective indicia, and community sentiment. Arizona Law Review, 819-840.
9.
Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877-899.
10.
Gibson, J. L. (1980). Environmental constraints on the behavior of judges: A representational model of judicial decision making. Law & Society Review, 14, 343-370.
11.
Gibson, J. L. , & Calderia, G. A. (1992). Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of diffuse support. The Journal of Politics, 54, 1121-1143.
12.
Gottfredson, S. D. , Warner, B. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1988). Conflict and consensus about criminal justice in Maryland. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing (pp. 16-55). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
13.
Graber, D. (1980). Media and public images of criminals and victims. In Crime news and the public (pp. 45-66). New York: Praeger.
14.
Kahneman, D. , Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Kritzer, H. M. (1979). Federal judges and their political environments: The influence of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 194-234.
16.
Lind, E. A. , Huo, Y. N., & Tyler, T. R. (1994). And justice for all: Ethnicity, gender, and preferences for dispute resolution procedures. Law & Human Behavior, 18, 269-290.
17.
Lind, E. A. , MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. E., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants' evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law & Society Review, 24, 953-996.
18.
Lurigio, A. J. , Carroll, J., & Stalans, L. J. (1994). Understanding judges' sentencing decisions: Attribution of responsibility and story construction. In L. Heath et al. (Eds.), Social psychological applications to social issues, Vol. 3. Application of heuristics and biases (pp. 91-115). New York: Plenum Press.
19.
Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 99-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Roberts, J. V. , & Doob, A. N. (1990). News media influence on public views of sentencing. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 451-468.
21.
Robinson, P. H. , & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22.
Stalans, L. J. (1993). Citizens' crime stereotypes, biased recall, and punishment preferences in abstract cases: The educative role of interpersonal sources. Law & Human Behavior, 17, 451-470.
23.
Stalans, L. J. (1994). Lay evaluations of encounters with government officials: Do expectations serve as filters and standards? In L. Heath, R. S. Tinsdale, et al. (Eds.), Applications of heuristics and biases to social issues (pp. 137-161). New York: Plenum Press.
24.
Stalans, L. J. , & Diamond, S. S. (1990). Formation and change in lay evaluations of criminal sentencing: Misperception and discontent. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 199-214.
25.
Stalans, L. J. , & Henry, G. T. (1994). Societal views of justice for adolescents accused of murder: Inconsistency between community sentiment and automatic legislative transfers. Law & Human Behavior, 18, 675-696.
26.
Thomson, D. , & Ragona, A. J. (1987). A revisionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions: Effects of specification. Crime and Delinquency, 33, 337-357.
27.
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958).
28.
Walker, N. , & Hough, M. (Eds.). (1988). Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
29.
Zemans, F. K. (1995). In the eye of the beholder: The relationship between the public and the courts. In G. L. Mays & P. R. Gregware (Eds.), Courts and justice: A reader (pp. 1-23). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.