Armstrong, T. J. , (Ed.). (1992). Michel Foucault: Philosopher. New York: Routledge.
2.
Barnes, B. (1988). The nature of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
Bernstein, R. (1994). Foucault: Critique as a philosophic ethos. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Critique and power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (pp. 211-241). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). The corporatism of the universal. The role of intellectuals in the modern world. Telos, 81, 99-110.
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Les règles de l'art. Paris: Seuil.
6.
Callon, M. , Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science. London: MacMillan.
7.
Cohen, J. L. , & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Connolly, W. E. (1985). Taylor, Foucault, and otherness. Political Theory, 13(3), 365-376.
9.
Connolly, W. E. (1991). Identity/Difference. Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10.
Connolly, W. E. (1993). Beyond good and evil. The ethical sensibility of Michel Foucault. Political Theory, 21(3), 365-389.
11.
Dews, P. (1987). Logics of distintegration. London: Verso.
12.
Dreyfus, H. , & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Dreyfus, H. , & Rabinow, P. (1986). What is maturity? Habermas and Foucault on “What is Enlightenment?”. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
16.
Foucault, M. (1977a). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
17.
Foucault, M. (1977b). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality I: An introduction. New York: Random House.
19.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
20.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Foucault, M. (1983). Structuralism and post-structuralism. Telos, 55.
22.
Foucault, M. (1984a). Space, knowledge, and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
23.
Foucault, M. (1984b). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
24.
Foucault, M. (1988a). Politics, philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings 1977-1984 (L. D. Kritzman, Ed.). New York: Routledge.
25.
Foucault, M. (1988b). Truth, power, self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
26.
Foucault, M. (1991a). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality. London: Harvester.
27.
Foucault, M. (1991b). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality. London: Harvester.
28.
Foucault, M. (1994). Kritiek en Verlichting (Dutch translation of Qu' est-ce que la critique? [Critique et Aufklärung]) [What is Critique? Critique and enlightenment]. Krisis. Tijdschrift voor filosofie, 56 (September). (Original work published 1990)
29.
Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices. Cambridge: Polity.
30.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
31.
Gouldner, A. W. (1973). For sociology. London: Allen Lane.
32.
Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung [Facticity and validity]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
34.
Hiley, D. R. (1988). Philosophy in question. Essays on a Pyrrhonian theme. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Honneth, A. (1994). Foucault's theory of society: A systems-theoretic dissolution of the Dialectic of Enlightenment. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Critique and power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (pp. 243-282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Keenan, T. (1987). The “paradox” of knowledge and power: Reading Foucault on a bias. Political Theory, 15(1), 5-37.
37.
Kelly, M. (1994). Foucault, Habermas, and the self-referentiality of critique. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Critique and power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (pp. 365-400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Kunneman, H. (1986). De waarheidstrechter. Meppel: Boom.
39.
Lacroix, B. (1981). Durkheim et le politique. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des sciences politiques.
40.
Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K. Knorr & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed. London: Sage.
41.
Latour, B. (1984). Les microbes. Guerre et paix. Paris: Fayard.
42.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief. A new sociology of knowledge?. London: Routledge.
43.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
44.
Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21, 165-171.
45.
Latour, B. (1991). The impact of science studies on political philosophy. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 16(1), 3-19.
46.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Law, J. (1986). Power, action, and belief. A new sociology of knowledge?. London: Routledge.
48.
Lukes, S. (1982). Introduction. In Durkheim (Ed.), The Rules of Scientific Method. London: MacMillan.
49.
McCarthy, T. (1994). The critique of impure reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Critique and power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (pp. 243-282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
Pels, D. (1983). Het project als object. Durkheim's kennispolitiek in relativistisch perspectief [The project as object. Durkheim and the politics of theory]. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift, 10(1), 51-91.
51.
Pels, D. (1987). Macht of eigendom? Een kwestie van intellectuele rivaliteit. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
52.
Pels, D. (1990). De natuurlijke saamhorigheid van feiten en waarden. [The natural proximity of facts and values]. Kennis & Methode, 14(1), 14-43.
53.
Pels, D. (1993). Het democratisch verschil. Jacques de Kadt en de nieuwe elite. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
54.
Pels, D. (1995). Knowledge politics and anti-politics? Toward a critical appraisal of Bourdieu's concept of intellectual autonomy. Theory and Society, 24, 79-104.
55.
Pels, D. (in press). Property or power? A study in intellectual rivalry. New York: Guilford.
56.
Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
57.
Rajchman, J. (1985). Foucault. The freedom of philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
58.
Rochlitz, R. (1992). The aesthetics of existence: Post-conventional morality and the theory of power in Michel Foucault. In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Philosopher. New York: Routledge.
59.
Root, M. (1993). Philosophy of social science. Oxford: Blackwell.
60.
Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
61.
Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth. Gentility, credibility, and scientific knowledge in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Taylor, C. (1985). Connolly, Foucault, and truth. Political Theory, 13(3), 377-385.
63.
Taylor, C. (1986). Foucault on freedom and truth. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
64.
Visker, R. (1990). Genealogie als kritiek. Michel Foucault en de menswetenschappen. Meppel: Boom.