In this article, the authors argue that to develop public policies that will work in the interests of diverse female consumers, it is imperative to recognize how sexism intersects with racism, classism, and heterosexism. The multiple simultaneous oppressions faced by diverse women make for vast differences in their consumption problems and the remedies they require. The authors illustrate how even consumer research that may seem to promote the interest of women actually serves privileged interests and ignores the reality of others. To move toward consumer research that will help shape public policy in the interests of diverse women, one needs to identify how research to date has enhanced the privilege of some women while neglecting or reinforcing the oppression of others. New research issues will need to be added to the agenda if the current situation is to improve.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bristor, J. M. , & Fischer, E. (1993). Feminist thought: Implications for consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 518-537.
2.
Bristor, J. M. , & Qualls, W. J. (1984). The household life cycle: Implications for family decision-making. In M. L. Roberts & L. H. Wortzel (Eds.), Marketing to the changing household: Management and research perspectives (pp. 25-40). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
3.
Chafetz, J. S. (1991). The gender division of labor and the reproduction of female disadvantage: Toward an integrated theory. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.), Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap (pp. 74-94). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Coleman, M. T. (1991). The division of household labor: Suggestions for future empirical consideration and theoretical development. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.), Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap (pp. 245-260). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
6.
Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage Books.
7.
DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Farney, D. (1994). Gay rights confront determined resistance from some moderates. Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
9.
Fischer, E. , & Arnold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of love: Gender roles and Christmas gift shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 333-345.
10.
Fischer, E. , & Bristor, J. M. (1994). A feminist poststructuralist analysis of the rhetoric of marketing relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 317-331.
11.
Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.
12.
Gilly, M. , & Enis, B. (1981). Recycling the family life cycle: A proposal for redefinition. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 9, pp. 271-276). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
13.
Glenn, E. N. (1991). Racial ethnic women's labor: The intersection of race, gender, and class oppression. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.), Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap (pp. 173-201). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D. Glass & D. Eversley (Eds.), Population in history (pp. 101-143). Chicago: Aldine.
15.
Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation systems. Population Development Review, 8, 449-494.
16.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
Hill, R. P. (1991). Homeless women, special possessions, and the meaning of “home”: An ethnographic case study. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 298-310.
18.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
19.
Hooks, B. (1981). Ain't I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End.
20.
Kertzer, D. I. (1991). Household history and sociological theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 155-179.
21.
Miller, C. (1994, July 4). Top marketers take bolder approach in targeting gays. Marketing News, pp. 1-2.
22.
Morganthau, T. (1989, September 11). Children of the underclass. Newsweek, pp. 16-27.
23.
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Ortiz, V. (1994). Women of color: A demographic overview. In M. B. Zinn & B. T. Dill (Eds.), Women of color in U.S. society (pp. 13-40). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
Palmer, P. M. (1983). White women/Black women: The dualism of female identity and experience in the United States. Feminist Studies, 9, 151-170.
26.
Richards, J. R. (1980). The skeptical feminist. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
Roberts, M. , & Wortzel, L. H. (1984). Introduction. In M. L. Roberts & L. H. Wortzel (Eds.), Marketing to the changing household: Management and research perspectives (pp. xv-xxv). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
28.
Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Schaninger, C. M. , & Danko, W. D. (1993). A conceptual and empirical comparison of alternative household life cycle models. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 580-594.
30.
Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework and leisure. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
31.
Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential women: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.
32.
Webster, C. (1994). Effects of hispanic ethnic identification on marital roles in the purchase decision process. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 319-331.
33.
Zinn, M. B. (1994). Feminist rethinking from racial-ethnic families. In M. B. Zinn & B. T. Dill (Eds.), Women of color in U.S. society (pp. 303-314). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
34.
Zinn, M. B. , & Dill, B. T. (1994). Difference and domination. In M. B. Zinn & B. T. Dill (Eds.), Women of color in U.S. society (pp. 3-12). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
