Agency: The power of actors to operate independently of the determining constraints of social structure. The term is intended to convey the volitional, purposive nature of human activity as opposed to its constrained, determined aspects.
—Harper Collins Dictionary of Sociology, 1991
The concept that the fetus is a patient, an individual whose maladies are a proper subject for medical treatment as well as scientific observation, is alarmingly modern. It was not until the last half of this century that the prying eye of the ultrasonographer rendered the once opaque womb transparent, letting the light of scientific observation fall on the shy and secretive fetus.
—M. R. Harrison
“The Fetus as a Patient: Historical Perspective”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ashmore, M. (1993). Behaviour modification of a catflap: A contribution to the sociology of things. Kennis en Methode, 17, 214-229.
3.
Becker, H. S. (1977). Sociological work: Method and substance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6.
Callon, M. , & Latour, B. (1992). Don't throw the baby out with the Bath school! In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 343-368). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Caspar, M. J. (1991). [Experimental field surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia]. Unpublished raw data.
8.
Casper, M. J. (in press). At the margins of humanity: Fetal positions in science and medicine. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 19.
9.
Clarke, A. E. , & Fujimura, J. H. (1992). What tools? Which jobs? Why right? In A. E. Clarke & J. H. Fujimura (Eds.), The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences (pp. 3-44). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Cohen, J. (1989). About steaks liking to be eaten: The conflicting views of symbolic interactionists and Talcott Parsons concerning the nature of relations between persons and nonhuman objects. Symbolic Interaction, 12(2), 191-213.
11.
Collins, H. M. , & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301-326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Downey, G. L. , Dumit, J., & Williams, S. (1992). Granting membership to the cyborg image. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.
13.
Edwards, D. (1994). Imitation and artifice in apes, humans, and machines. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 754-771.
14.
Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65-107.
16.
Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17.
Haraway, D. J. (1991a). The actors are cyborg, nature is coyote, and the geography is elsewhere: Postscript to “Cyborgs at large.” In C. Penley & A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 21-26). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Haraway, D. J. (1991b). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19.
Harrison, M. R. (1991). The fetus as a patient: Historical perspective. In M. R. Harrison, M. S. Golbus, & R. A. Filly (Eds.), The unborn patient: Prenatal diagnosis and treatment (pp. 3-7). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
20.
Harrison, M. R. , & Longaker, M. T. (1991). Maternal risk and the development of fetal surgery. In M. R. Harrison, M. S. Golbus, & R. A. Filly (Eds.), The unborn patient: Prenatal diagnosis and treatment (pp. 189-202). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
21.
Jary, D. , & Jary, J. (1991). The HarperCollins dictionary of sociology. New York: HarperPerennial.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Latour, B. (writing as Johnson, J.) (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35, 298-310.
25.
Latour, B. (1994). Pragmatogonies: A mythical account of how humans and nonhumans swap together. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 791-808.
26.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 111-134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Law, J. (1991). Introduction: Monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 1-23). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
Lempert, L. B. (1992). The crucible: Violence, help-seeking, and abused women's transformations of self. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco.
29.
Liley, A. W. (1986). The fetus as a personality. Fetal Therapy, 1, 8-17.
30.
Mani, L. (1992). Cultural theory, colonial texts: Reading eyewitness accounts of widow burning. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 392-408). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
Marcus, G. , & Fischer, M.M.J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Park, R. E. (1952). Human communities. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
34.
Penley, C. , & Ross, A. (1991). Cyborgs at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In C. Penley & A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 1-20). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
Petchesky, R. P. (1987). Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. In M. Stanworth (Ed.), Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood, and medicine (pp. 57-80). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
37.
Queenan, J. (1993, June). The fetus as a patient: The origin of the specialty. Paper presented at the Institute of Medicine Conference on Fetal Research and Applications, Irvine, CA.
38.
Reinharz, S. (1987). The social psychology of miscarriage: An application of symbolic interaction theory and method. In M. J. Deegan & M. R. Hill (Eds.), Women and symbolic interaction (pp. 229-249). Boston: Allen & Unwin.
39.
Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.
40.
Shapin, S. , & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
42.
Stabile, C. (1992). Shooting the mother: Fetal photography and the politics of disappearance. Camera Obscura, 28, 179-206.
43.
Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26-56). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44.
Stone, A. R. (1989, November). Sex and death among the cyborgs: How to construct gender and boundary in information systems. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Irvine, CA.
45.
Strauss, A. (1991). Creating sociological awareness: Collective images and symbolic representations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
46.
Thomas, W. I. (1978). The definition of the situation. In R. Farrell & V. Swigert (Eds.), Social deviance (pp. 54-57). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
47.
Thomas, W. I. , & Thomas, D. S. (1970). Situations defined as real are real in their consequences. In G. P. Stone & H. A. Farberman (Eds.), Social psychology through symbolic interaction (pp. 154-155). Waltham, MA: Xerox.
48.
West, C. , & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Doing gender. In J. Lorber & S. A. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender (pp. 13-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
