Ashmore, M. (in press). Review of Science as practice and culture, edited by A. Pickering. Contemporary Sociology.
2.
Atkinson, J. M. , & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Ayto, J. (1990). Dictionary of word origins. London: Bloomsbury.
4.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5.
Callon, M. , & Latour, B. (1992). Don't throw the baby out with the Bath school! In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 343-368). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Casper, M. J. (1994). Reframing and grounding nonhuman agency: What makes a fetus an agent?American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 839-856.
7.
Collins, H. M. & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301-326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Edwards, D. (1994). Imitation and artifice in apes, humans, and machines. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 754-771.
9.
Findlater, A. (Ed.). (1905). Chambers etymological dictionary of the English language. London & Edinburgh: W. R. Chambers.
10.
Forsythe, D. (1992). Blaming the user in medical informatics: The cultural nature of scientific practice. In A. Rip, L. Layne, & D. Hess (Eds.), Knowledge and society, Vol. 11. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic. London: Tavistock.
12.
Freud, S. (1925). Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes (J. Strachey, Trans.). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Collected papers, Vol. 5: Miscellaneous papers, 1888-1938. London: Hogarth.
13.
Freud, S. (1937). The psychology of women (W.J.H. Sprott, Trans.). In E. Jones (Ed.), New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.
14.
Fuller, S. (1994). Making agency count. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 741-753.
15.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Johnson, J. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35, 298-310.
17.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
18.
Laqueur, T. (1992). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In M. Mulkay & K. Knorr-Cetina (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.
20.
Lee, N. , & Brown, S. (1994). Otherness and the actor network: The undiscovered continent. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 772-790.
21.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
23.
Singleton, V. (1993, September). Actor network theory: A useful tool for feminists approaching science? Paper presented at the CRICT Workshop, “European Theoretical Perspectives on New Technology: Feminism, Constructivism and Utility,”Brunel University.
24.
Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.
25.
Woolgar, S. (1992). Some remarks about positionism: A reply to Collins and Yearley. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 327-342). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.