Angleitner, A. (1991). Personality psychology: Trends and developments. European Journal of Personality, 5, 185-197.
2.
Bem, D. J. (1983). Constructing a theory of the triple typology: Some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality. Journal of Personality, 51, 566-577.
3.
Bruner, J. S. , & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 634-654). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Cantor, N. , & Kihlstrom, J. F. (Eds.). (1981). Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Cantor, N. , & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 3-52). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Fisher, H. (1990). Are individual persons motivated to construct categories or do they merely intend meanings? In D. N. Robinson & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 211-218). New York: Plenum.
7.
Golding, S. J. (1978). Toward a more adequate theory of personality: Psychological organizing principles. In H. London (Ed.), Personality: A new look at metatheories (pp. 69-95). New York: Wiley.
8.
Hartshorne, H. , May, M. A., & Shuttleworth, F. K. (1930). Studies in the organization of character. New York: Macmillan.
9.
Higgins, E. T. , Kuiper, N. A., & Olson, J. M. (1981). Social cognition: A need to get personal. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 395-420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Higgins, E. T. , Rholes, C. R., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
11.
Jones, E. E. , & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Lamiell, J. T. (1984). Personality: The individual in a scientific psychology. In W. N. Dember, J. J. Jenkins, & T. Teyler (Eds.), General psychology (2nd ed., pp. 643-685). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Lamiell, J. T. (1990a). Explanation in the psychology of personality. In D. N. Robinson & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 153-192). New York: Plenum.
15.
Lamiell, J. T. (1990b). Let's be careful out there: Reply to the commentaries. In D. N. Robinson & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 219-231). New York: Plenum.
16.
Lamiell, J. T. , & Durbeck, P. (1987). Whence cognitive prototypes in impression formation? Some empirical evidence for dialectical reasoning as a generative process. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8, 223-244.
17.
Lamiell, J. T. , Foss, M. A., & Cavenee, P. (1980). On the relationship betwen conceptual schemes and behavior reports: A closer look. Journal of Personality, 48, 54-73.
18.
Lamiell, J. T. , Foss, M. A., Larsen, R. J., & Hempel, A. (1983). Studies in intuitive personology from an idiothetic point of view: Implications for personality theory. Journal of Personality, 51, 438-467.
19.
Lamiell, J. T. , Foss, M. A., Trierweiler, S. J., & Leffel, G. M. (1983). Toward a further understanding of the intuitive personologist: Some preliminary evidence for the dialectical quality of subjective personality impressions. Journal of Personality, 53, 213-235.
20.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemas and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
21.
Markus, H. (1983). Self-knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality, 51, 541-565.
22.
Markus, H. , Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38-50.
23.
Markus, H. , & Sentis, K. (1982). The self in social information processing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 41-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Markus, H. , & Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemata on the perception of others. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 233-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
26.
Mischel, W. (1977). On the future of personality measurement. American Psychologist, 32, 246-254.
27.
Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality. American Psychologist, 34, 740-754.
28.
Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39, 351-364.
29.
Phares, E. J. , & Lamiell, J. T. (1977). Personality. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 113-140). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
30.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.
31.
Rosch, E. , & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
32.
Rychlak, J. F. (1991). Artificial intelligence and human reason: A teleological critique. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
Stern, L. W. (1900). Über Psychologie der individuellen Differenzen: Ideen zu einer “differenziellen Psychologie.”Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.
34.
Stern, L. W. (1923). Person und Sache. II. Band: Die Menschliche Persönlichkeit (3rd ed.). Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.
35.
Wyer, R. S. , & Srull, T. K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 161-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
