ABIR-AM, P. G. and D. OUTRAM [eds.] (1987) Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science 1789-1979. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
2.
FEE, E. (1981) “Is feminism a threat to scientific objectivity?”Int. J. of Women's Studies4 (4): 378-392.
3.
HAAS, V. B. and C. C. PERRUCCI [eds.] (1984) Women in Scientific and Engineering Professions. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
4.
HARDING, S. and M. HINTIKKA [eds.] (1983) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
5.
HARTSOCK, N. (1983) “The feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism.” Pp. 283-310 in S. Harding and M. Hintikka (eds.) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
6.
MALCOLM, S. , P. Q. HALL, and J. W. BROWN. (1976) The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science (Report No. 76-R-3). Washington, DC: AAAS.
7.
RESTIVO, S. (1988) “Modern science as a social problem.”Social Problems35 (3): 206-225.
8.
ROSSITER, M. (1982) Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
9.
SANDS, A. (1986) “Never meant to survive: a black woman's journey. An interview with Evelyn Hammonds.”Radical Teacher30: 8-15.
10.
SAYRE, A. (1975) Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York: W. W. Norton
11.
SCHIEBINGER, L. (1987) “The history and philosophy of women in science: a review essay.”Signs12 (2): 305-332.
12.
SMITH, D. (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.
13.
WATSON, J. (1969) The Double Helix. New York: New American Library.