Anderson, G. (1970) "The preliminary hearing: better alternatives or more of the same?"Missouri Law Rev.35 (Summer): 281-325.
2.
Blackstone, W. (1768) An Analysis of the Laws of EnglandOxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our WillNew York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
Burke, J. (1976) Osborne's Concise Law DictionaryLondon: Sweet & Maxwell.
5.
CARROLL v. U.S. (1924) 267 U.S. 132.
6.
Dash, S. (1974) "Cracks in the foundation of criminal justice." pp. 246-259 in J. A. Robertson (ed.) Rough Justice: Perspectives on Lower Criminal Courts.Boston: Little, Brown .
7.
Geis, G. (1978) "Lord Hale, witches, and rape."British J. of Law and Society5(Summer): 131-143.
8.
———( 1972) Not the Law's Business?: An Examination of Homosexuality, Abortion, Prostitution and Gambling in the United StatesWashington: Government Printing Office.
9.
———( 1961) "Preliminary hearings and the press."UCLA Law Rev.8 (March): 397-414.
10.
———Wright, R., Garrett, T., and P.R. Wilson (1976) "Reported consequences of decriminalization of consensual adult homosexuality in seven American states."J. of Homosexuality1 (Summer): 419-426.
11.
Great Britain, Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (1957) Report. Command 247London: Her Majesty's Stationers Office.
12.
Holdsworth, W.W. (1922) A History of English LawLondon : Methuen.
13.
Hoskins, W.A. (1976-1977) "An analysis of the questions of county jail reform in Kentucky."Kentucky Law J.65, 2: 130-167.
14.
Howard, J. (1777) The State of the Prisons in England and WalesA bingdon: Professional Books.
15.
Jenks, E. (1924) A Short History of English LawLondon: Methuen.
16.
In re JOHNSON (1970) 475 P.2d 841.
17.
KURTZ v. MOFFIT (1885) 115 U.S. 487.
18.
Lord Hailsham of Marylebone (1976) Halsbury's Laws of EnglandLondon: Butter-worth's.