Nuclear Policy and Public Participation

American Politics Quarterly (1975) "Candidates, parties and issues in the American Electorate." 3 (July): 247-283

American Political Science Review (1972) "Issue voting." 66 (June): 415-470.

Atomic Energy Act (1946) 60 Stat. 733: 42 U.S. Code 2211 (1970).

Baker, R F. , R. M. Michaels , and E S. Preston ( 1975 ) Public Policy Development : Linking the Technical and Political Processes. New York: John Wiley .

Burnham, D. (1978) "Congress unit says U.S. tried to balk California nuclear curbs." New York Times (January 16): A12.

Costantini, E. and K. Hanf (1972) "Environmental concern and Lake Tahoe ." Environment and Behavior 4 (June): 209-242.

Crain, R. L. , E. Katz , and D B. Rosenthal (1969) The Politics of Community Conflict: The Fluoridation Decision. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

Davis, D. H (1978) Energy Politics . New York: St. Martin's Press .

Dettloff, J. and A. Federhar (1976) "Public attitudes about nuclear energy in Arizona." University of Arizona Institute of Government Research.

Dunlap, R. E. and M. P. Allen (1976) "Partisan differences on environmental issues." Western Political Q. 29 (September): 384-397.

Ebasco (1976) A Second Survey of Public and Leadership Attitudes Toward Nuclear Development m the U.S New York: EBASCO Services.

Energy Reorganization Act (1974) 42 U.S. Code 5801.

Erskine, H. (1972) "The polls: pollution and its costs" Public Opinion Q. 35 (June): 120-234.

Festinger, L. (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

Gallup Poll Index (1976) Report Number 134 (September).

Groth, A. J. and H. G. Schultz (1976) "Voter attitudes on the 1976 nuclear initiative in California." Environmental Quality Series, No. 25. Davis: University of California Institution of Government Affairs (December).

Lerner, A. (1976) Experts, Politicians and Decision Making in the Technological Society. New York: General Learning Press.

Mueller, J. (1969) "Voting on the propositions: ballot patterns and historical trends in California." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 63 (December): 1197-1212.

Mohr, C. (1978) "Antinuclear drives: diffuse but effective." New York Times (June 24): C6.

Oregon (1976) Office of the Secretary of State. Ballot for November 2: Proposed by Initiative Petition.

Oregon Revised Statues (1975) 176.810, 469.010.

Price-Anderson Act (1957) 71 Stat. 576, 42 U.S. Code 2210 (1970).

Purdy, B. J , E. Peelle , B. H. Bronfman , and D. J. Bjornstad (1977) A Post Licensing Study of Community Effects at Two Operating Nuclear Power Plants. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (September).

Schooler, D., Jr. (1971) Science, Scientists, and Public Policy. New York Free Press.

Springer, J. F. and E. Costantini (1974) "Public opinion and the environment: an issue in search of a home," pp. 195-224 in S. S. Nagel (ed.) Environmental Politics. New York: Praeger.

Sundstrom, E. J. , L. J. Costomiris , R. C. Devault , D. A. Dowell , J. W. Lounsbury , T. J. Mattingly, Jr. , E. M. Passino , and E. Peelle ( 1977) Citizens' Views About the Proposed Hartsville Nuclear Power Plant: A Survey of Residents' Perceptions in August 1975. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (May).

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (1975) Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

——— (1957) Theoretical Possibilities and Consequences of Major Accidents in Large Nuclear Power Plants. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.

U.S. Federal Power Commission (1974, 1976) Utility Prices Yearbook. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

U.S. Geological Survey (1976) National Energy Transport System. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Vermont Statutes Annotated (1975) Title 30, Section 248 (c), Cumulative Supplement.

Virginia Law Review (1976) "Application of the preemption doctrine to state laws affecting nuclear plants." 62: 738-781.

Washington (1976) Office of the Secretary of State Ballot for November 2, Initiative Measure #325