ArndtJ. (1971) “Exploring consumer willingness to buy new products.”Markeds Kommunckasjon8: 1–12
2.
ArndtJ. (1967) “Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product.”J. of Marketing Research4: 291–295
3.
BassF.WilkieW. (1973) “A comparative analysis of attitudinal predictions of brand preference.”J. of Marketing Research10 (August): 262–269
4.
BaumgartenS. (1975) “The innovative communication in the diffusion process.”J. of Marketing Research12 (February): 12–18
5.
BitherS.MillerS. (1969) “A cognitive theory view of brand preference.” Proceedings of the Fall Conference of the American Marketing Association: 280–286
6.
BlattbergR.SenS. (1974) “Market segmentation using models of multidimensional purchasing behavior.”J. of Marketing38 (October): 17–28
7.
CalderB. J. (1977) “Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research.”J. of Marketing Research14 (August): 353–364
8.
CaplanN.NelsonS. D. (1973) “On being useful: the nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems.”Amer. Psychologist28 (March): 199–211
9.
DayG. (1972) “Evaluating models of attitude structure.”J. of Marketing Research9 (August): 279–286
10.
DayG.DeutscherT.RyansA. (1976) “Data quality, level of aggregation, and nonmetric multidimensional scaling solutions.”J. of Marketing Research13 (February): 92–97
11.
DeutscherT. (1974) “The measurement of change in attitude structure through analysis of perceptual and preference maps.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. (unpublished)
12.
DonnellyJ.EtzelM. (1973) “Degrees of product newness and early trial.”J. of Marketing Research10 (August): 295–300
13.
DulanyD. (1968) “Awareness, rules, and propositional control: a confrontation with S-R behavior theory,” pp. 340–387 in HortonD.DixonT. (eds.) Verbal Behavior and General Behavior Theory.New York: Prentice-Hall
14.
FishbeinM. (1967) “Attitude and the prediction of behavior,” pp. 477–492 in FishbeinM. (ed.) Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement.New York: John Wiley
15.
EnisB. (1973) “Deepening the concept of marketing.”J. of Marketing37 (October): 57–62
16.
GreenP. (1975) “Marketing applications of MDS: assessment and outlook.”J. of Marketing39 (January): 24–31
17.
GreenP.CarmoneF. (1972) Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis.Boston: Allyn & Bacon
18.
GreenP.RobinsonP. (1968) Analysis of Marketing Behavior Using Nonmetric Scaling and Related Techniques. Technical Monograph (Interim), Marketing Science Institute. University of Pennsylvania
19.
HaleyR. (1968) “Benefit segmentation: a decision oriented research tool.”J. of Marketing32 (July): 30–35
20.
JacobyJ. (1975) “Consumer research: telling it like it is,” in B. Anderson, (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 3, Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research
21.
JonassenC. T. (1959) “Contributions of sociology to marketing.”J. of Marketing24 (October): 29–35
KotlerP.ZaltmanG. (1972) “Social marketing: an approach to planned social change.” in ZaltmanG.KotlerP.KaufmanJ. (eds.) Creating Social Change.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
24.
KotlerP.LevyS. (1969) “Broadening the concept of marketing.”J. of Marketing33 (January): 10–15
25.
LovelockC. (1976) “The department of the treasury reissue of the $2 bill.”Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Case Study
26.
MazisM.AhtolaO.KlippelR. (1975) “A comparison of four multi-attribute models in the prediction of consumer attitudes.”J. of Consumer Research2:38–52
27.
MoinpourR.WileyJ. (1972) “An approach to the resolution of multicollinearity in the attribute structure of attitudes.” Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research
28.
MorganJ.PurnellJ. (1969) “Isolated openings of new products in a multidimensional space.”J. of the Market Research Society11 (July): 245–266
29.
NaderR. (1965) Unsafe at Any Speed.New York: Grossman
30.
NeidellL. (1969) “The use of nonmetric multidimensional scaling in marketing analysis.”J. of Marketing33 (October): 37–43
31.
PappasV. (1977) “The deuce is a dud: $2 bill wins favor only as a souvenir.”Wall Street Journal (January 5): 1
32.
PessemierE. (1972) “Measuring stimulus attributes to predict individual preference and choice.” Institute Paper No. 318, Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Purdue University
33.
RajuP. S.BhagatR.ShethJ. (1975) “Predictive validation and cross-validation of the Fishbein, Rosenberg, and Sheth models of attitudes,” in M. J. Schlinger (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 2. Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research
34.
ReynoldsF.DardenW. (1971) “Mutually adaptive effects of interpersonal communication.”J. of Marketing Research8 (November): 449–454
35.
RobertsonL. S. (1976) “The great seat belt campaign flop.”J. of Communication26 (Autumn): 41–45
36.
RobertsonL. S. (1972) “Factors associated with observed safety belt use.”J. of Health and Social Behavior13 (January): 18–24
37.
RogersE. M.PareekU. (1977) “Acceptability of fertility regulating mechanisms: a synthesis of research literature.”Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Institute lor Communication Research
38.
RogersE. M. (1977a) “Handbook of formative evaluation in communication design.”Stanford, CA.Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research
39.
RogersE. M. (1977b) Bibliography on the Diffusion of Innovations.Monticello, IL: Council of Planning Librarians Exchange Bibliographers, Bibliography 1420-2
40.
RyanM.FieldE. H. Bon (1975) “The Fishbein extended model and consumer behavior.”J. of Consumer Research2 (September): 118–136
41.
RyansA. (1973) “Estimating consumer preferences for a new durable brand at a given price in an established product class: the development of a model and an experimental test.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. (unpublished)
42.
ShepardR.RomneyA. K.NerloveS. B. (1972) Multidimensional Scaling.New York: Seminar Press
43.
ShockerA.SrinivasanV. (1974) “A consumer-based methodology for the identification of new product ideas.”Management Sci.20 (February): 921–939
44.
TorgersonW. (1958) Theory and Methods of Multidimensional Scaling.New York: John Wiley
45.
TuncalpS.ShethJ. (1975) “Prediction of attitudes: a comparative study of the Rosenberg, Fishbein and Sheth Models,” in M. J. Schlinger (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 2. Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research
46.
UhlK.AndrusR.PoulsenL. (1970) “How are laggards different? An empirical inquiry.”J. of Marketing Research9 (February): 51–54
47.
WalkerJ. L. (1976) “Setting the agenda in the U.S. Senate: a theory of problem selection.”Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute of Public Policy Studies, Discussion Paper 94
48.
Wall Street Journal (1976) “Dubious debut.” (June 17)
49.
WeddleD.BettmanJ. (1973) “Marketing underground: an investigation of Fishbein's behavioral intention model,” in S. Ward and P. Wright (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research. Volume I. Proceeding of the American Association for Consumer Research
50.
WhitesideT. (1972) The Investigation of Ralph Nader: General Motors vs. One Determined Man.New York: Arbor House
51.
WilkieW.PessemierE. (1973) “Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models.”J. of Marketing Research10 (November): 428–441
52.
ZaltmanG. (1972) “Multi-attribute models for predicting individual preferences and choice.” Institute Paper No. 346, Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Purdue University
53.
ZaltmanG. (1964) Marketing: Contributions from the Behavioral Sciences.New York: Harcourt Brace & World