Aranson, P., M. Hinich, and P. Ordeshook (1974) "Election goals and strategies: equivalent and non-equivalent candidate objectives." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.68 (March): 135-152.
2.
Axelrod, R. (1970) Conflict of Interest. Chicago : Markham.
3.
Barber, J. (1965) The Law Makers: Recruitment and Adaptation to Political Life. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
4.
Black, G. (1972) "A theory of political ambition: career choices and the role of structural incentives." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.66 (January): 144-159.
Brown, R. (1962) Explanation in Social Science. Chicago: Aldine.
7.
Bryce, J. (1910) The American Commonwealth. New York: Macmillan.
8.
Butterworth, R. (1971) "A research note on the size of winning coalitions ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.65 (September): 741-745.
9.
Collingwood, R.G. (1946) The Idea of History. New York : Oxford Univ. Press.
10.
Davis, O. and M. Hinich (1966) "A mathematical model of policy formation in a democratic society," pp. 175-208 in J. Bernd (ed.) Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Dallas: Arnold Foundation of Southern Methodist University.
11.
——— (1967) "Some results related to a mathematical model of policy formation in a democratic society," pp. 14-37 in J. Bernd (ed.) Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Charlottesville: Univ. Press of Virginia.
12.
——— (1968) "On the power and importance of the mean preference in a mathematical model of democratic choice." Public Choice5 (Fall): 59-72.
13.
———, and P. ORDESHOOK (1970) "An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.64 (June): 426-448.
14.
DeSwaan, A. (1973) Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
17.
Duverger, M. (1963) Political Parties (B. and R. North, trans.). New York: John Wiley.
18.
Fowler, L. (1976) "The cycle of defeat: recruitment of political candidates." Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester .
19.
Frohlich, N. (1975) "The instability of minimum winning coalitions ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.69 (September): 943-946.
20.
Gamson, W. (1961) "A theory of coalition-formation." Amer. Soc. Rev.26 (April): 373-382.
21.
Hardin, R. (1976) "Hollow victory: the minimum winning coalition ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70 (December): 1202-1214.
22.
Hempel, C. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.
23.
——— (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
Hermens, F.A. (1941) Democracy or Anarchy. South Bend, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
25.
Hinich, M. and P. Ordeshook (1970) "Plurality maximization vs. vote maximization: a spatial analysis with variable participation." Amer. Pol. Sci.64 (September): 772-791.
26.
Homans, G. (1967) The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
27.
Hotelling, H. (1929) "Stability in competition." Econ. J.34 (March): 41-75.
28.
Koehler, D. (1975) "Legislative coalition formation: the meaning of minimal winning size with uncertain participation." Amer. J. of Pol. Science19 (February): 27-39.
29.
Kramer, G. (1975) "A dynamical model of equilibrium." New Haven, CT: Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 36, Yale University. (mimeo)
30.
Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (second ed.)Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press .
31.
Lakatos, I. andA. Musgrave [eds.]( 1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge . Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
32.
Leiserson, M. (1968) "Factions and coalitions in one-party Japan." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.62 (September): 770-787.
33.
MacMahon, A. (1931) "Political parties-United States," pp. 596 ff. in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 11. New York : Macmillan.
34.
McKelvey, R.D. (1975) "Policy related voting and electoral equilibrium ." Econometrica43 (September): 815-843.
35.
——— (1976) "Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control." J. of Econ. Theory12 (June): 472-482.
36.
——— (1977) "General conditions for global intransitivies in formal voting models: some implications for agenda control." Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. (mimeo)
37.
——— and P.C. Ordeshook (1976) "Symmetric spatial games without majority rule equilibria." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70 (December): 1172-1184.
38.
———, and R. Smith (1974) "The bargaining set and the size principle." Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. (mimeo)
39.
MacRae , D. (1976) The Social Function of Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
40.
Mannheim, K. (1949) Ideology and Utopia. New York : Harcourt-Brace.
41.
Moon, J.D. (1975) "The logic of political inquiry: a synthesis of opposed perspectives," pp. 131-278 in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science, vol. I. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.
Nagel, E. (1961) The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
43.
Ordeshook, P. (1970) "Extensions of a mathematical model of the electoral process and implications for the theory of responsible parties." Midwest J. of Pol. Science14 (February): 43-70.
44.
Plott, C. (1967) "A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule." Amer. Econ. Rev. (September): 787-806.
45.
Popper, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
46.
Rae, D. ( 1967) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
47.
Riker, W. (1957) "Events and situations." J. of Philosophy54 (January): 57-70. ——— (1958) "Causes of events." J. of Philosophy55 (March): 281-291.
48.
——— (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
49.
——— (1976) "The number of political parties: a reexamination of Duverger's law." Compar. Politics9 (October): 93-106.
