BenneK.The Philosopher and the Scientific Researcher in the Study of Education,The Journal of Social Issues, XXI, 2 (1965), 71–84.
2.
BinzenPeter H., Colleges Split on How to Handle Secret Government Research, The Sunday Bulletin, Philadelphia, Nov. 7, 1965, p. 14.
3.
BoguslawRobert, The New Utopians: A study of System Design and Social Change. (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965).
4.
McGeorgeBundy, Statement of McGeorge Bundy, Dean of Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard Univ. before U.S. Senate Committee on Govt. Operations. (Unpublished Hearing), March, 1955, Washington, D.C. pp. 470–72.
5.
CarterLuther J., Social Sciences: Problems Examined by Senate Panel.Science, 153 (July, 1966), 154–56.
6.
88th Congress, Reports of the House Select Committee on Government Research, Vol. II.: (U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C., Feb. 17, 1964).
7.
89th Congress, Testimony before House Special Committee on Invasion of Privacy of the Committee on Government Operations: June 2, 3, 4, 7, 23, 1965, (Unpublished Hearings), American Psychologist, 20, 11 (1965), 955–88.
8.
89th Congress, Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary. June 7–10, 1965, (Unpublished Hearings), Washington, D.C., American Psychologist, 20, 11 (1965) 888–954.
9.
DupreJ. S.LakoffS. A., Science and the Nation: Policy and Politics. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1962).
10.
GouldnerA., Anti-minotaur: The Myth of a Value-free Sociology in SteinM.VidichA. (eds.), Sociology on Trial (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963).
11.
GrodzinsM., The Basis of National Loyalty, in GrodzinM.RabinowitchE. (eds.), The Atomic Age. (New York: Basic Books, 1963).
12.
KelmanH. C., Manipulation of Human Behavior: An Ethical Dilemma for the Social Scientist,The Journal of Social IssuesXXI, 2 (1965), 31–46.
13.
KelmanH. C., The Social Consequences of Social Research: A New Social Issue,The Journal of Social Issues, XXI, 3 (1965), 21–40.
14.
KerrC., The Uses of the University (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963).
15.
KiddC. V., American Universities and Federal Research (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 1959).
16.
KrasnerL., The Behavioral Scientist and Social Responsibility: No Place to HideThe Journal of Social Issues, XXI2, (1965), 9–30.
17.
LappR. E., The New Priesthood: The Scientific Elite and the Uses of Power (New York: Harper and Row, 1965).
18.
McCormackJ.FulmerV. A., Federal Sponsorship of University Research, in The American Assembly (Columbia University), The Federal Government and Higher Education (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.1960)
19.
RogersC. R.SkinnerB. F., Some Issues Concerning the Control of Human Behavior: A Symposium.Science, 124 (1965), 1057–66.
20.
RossiP. H., Researchers, Scholars and Policy makers: The Politics of Large Scale Research.Daedalus93, 4 (1964), 1142–61.
21.
SanfordN., Social Science and Social Reform.The Journal of Social Issues, XXI2 (1965), 54–70.
22.
SeeleyJ. R., Social Science? Some Probative Problems. In SteinM.VidichA., (eds.), Sociology on trial. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963).
23.
SherwinC. W., The Management of Science in the Public Interest. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist, June, 1964, pp. 9–12.
24.
ShilsE. A., America's Paper Curtin, in GrodzinsM.RabinowitchE. (eds.), The Atomic Age (New York): Basic Books, 1963).
25.
Subcommittee on International Organizations and Movements, Behavioral Sciences and the National Security Report No. 4 (together with part IX of the hearings on winning the cold war: the U.S. Ideological Offensive) Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, Dec. 6, 1965.