Evaluation of six studies suggests that the case for learning and attitude change resulting from simulation games may not be as strong as has been claimed. Alternative ways of using simulations to maximize learning are then presented. The author, who has just received his Ph.D. in political science from Northwestern University, is now Assistant Professor of Political Science and Research Associate at the Social Science Teaching Institute, Michigan State University.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, Lee F. "Combining Simulation and Case Studies in the Teaching of American Foreign Policy." Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University, 1964. (Mimeographed.)
2.
Baker, Gene. "A Comparative Study Using Textbook and Simulation Approaches in Teaching Junior High American History." Doctoral dissertation in progress, School of Education, Northwestern University.
3.
Bloomfield, L.P. and Padelford, N.J. "Three Experiments in Political Gaming," The American Political Science Review, LIII ( 1959), 1105-1115.
4.
Boocock, Sarane S. "Effects of Election Campaign Game in Four High School Classes," Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University , Report No. 1, Research Program in the Effects of Games with Simulated Environments in Secondary Education, 1963.
5.
Boocock, Sarane S. and Coleman, James S. "Games with Simulated Environments in Learning ," Sociology of Education, 39 (Summer, 1966), 215-263.
6.
Bruner, Jerome S.The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.
7.
Campbell, Donald T. and Fiske, D.W. "Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multi-trait-Multimethod Matrix," Psychological Bulletin, 56 (1959), 81-105.
8.
Cherryholmes, Cleo H.Developments in Simulation of International Relations for High School Teaching . Unpublished Master's thesis, Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia1963.
9.
Cnudde, Charles F. and McCrone, Donald J. "The Linkage between Constituency Attitudes and Congressional Voting Behavior: A Causal Model," The American Political Science Review, LX ( 1966), 66-73.
10.
Garvey, Dale M. and Seiler, William H. "A Study of Effectiveness of Different Methods of Teaching International Relations to High School Students," Emporia: Kansas State Teachers College, 1966.
11.
Goldhamer, H. and Speier, H. "Some Observations on Political Gaming," World Politics , XII (1959), 71-83.
12.
Guetzkow, Harold. "A Use of Simulation in the Study of Inter-Nation Relations," Behavioral Science, IV ( 1959), 183-191.
13.
Guetzkow, Harold; Alger, Chadwick, Brody, Richard A.; Noel, Robert C.; and Snyder, Richard C.Simulation in International Relations : Developments for Research and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.
14.
McKeachie, W.J. "Research on Teaching at the College and University Level," in N. L. Gage, ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1963, 1118-1172.
15.
Metcalf, Lawrence E. "Research on Teaching the Social Studies," in N. L. Gage, ed., op. cit, 929-966.
16.
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E. "Constituency Influence in Congress," The American Political Science Review, LVII ( 1963 ) , 45-56.
17.
Parsons, T.S., Ketcham, W.A. and Beach, L.R. "Effects of varying degrees of student interaction and student-teacher contact in college courses,"paper read at American Sociological Society, Seattle, 1958, as reported in McKeachie, op cit.
18.
Robinson, James A., Anderson, Lee F., Hermann, Margaret G. and Snyder, Richard C. , "Teaching with Inter-Nation Simulation and Case Studies," The American Political Science Review, LX ( 1966), 53-66.
19.
Shubik, Martin, ed. Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
