Jones E. A. Jr., ed., Law and Electronics: The Challenge of a New Era (1962).
2.
M.U.L.L., American Bar Association, 1155 E. 60th St., Chicago 37, Ill.
3.
LoevingerL., “Jurimetrics: The Next Step Forward,” 33 Minn. Law R. 455 (1949); R. N. Freed, “Machine Data Processing Systems for the Trial Lawyer,” The Practical Lawyer 73 (April 1960); J. S. Melton and R. C. Bensing, “Searching Legal Literature Electronically: Results of a Test Program,” 45 Minn. Law R. 229 (1960); J. R. Brown, “Electronic Brains and the Legal Mind: Computing the Data Computer's Collision with Law,” 71 Yale Law J. 239 (1961); R. N. Freed, “Prepare Now for Machine Assisted Legal Research,” 47 Amer. Bar Assoc. J. 764 (1961); W. B. Kehl, J. F. Horty, C. R. T. Bacon and D. S. Mitchell, “An Information Retrieval Language for Legal Studies,” 4 Communications of the Assoc. for Computing Machinery 380 (1961); L. E. Allen, R. B. S. Brooks and P. A. James, Automatic Retrieval of Legal Literature: Why and How (1962); F. Wiener, “Prediction by Computers: Nonsense Cubed-and Worse,” 48 Amer. Bar Assoc. J. 1023 (1962); R. A. Wilson, “Computer Retrieval of Case Law,” 16 Southwestern Law J. 409 (1962); F. R. Dickerson, “Some Jurisprudential Implications of Electronic Data Processing,” 29 Law and Contemporary Problems 53 (1963); W. B. Eldridge and S. F. Dennis, “The Computer as a Tool for Legal Research,” 29 Law and Contemporary Problems 5 (1963).
4.
For a description of one research effort to design cultural objects (a set of games) to hasten this absorption of mathematical and logical skills more generally by encouraging more positive attitudes toward this kind of symbol-manipulating activity, see Allen, Brooks, Dickoff, and James, “The ALL Project (Accelerated Learning of Logic),” 68 Amer. Math. Monthly 497 (May 1961); and L. E. Allen, WFF 'N PROOF: The Game of Modern Logic (1962).
5.
21 Congressional Quarterly 1310 (July 26, 1963).
6.
AllenL. E., “Beyond Document Retrieval Toward Information Retrieval,” 47 Minn. Law R. 715 (1963).
