Jacques Barzun, THE HousE OF INTELLECT. New York: Harper, 1959, p. 183.
2.
See, e.g., W.S. Rich, AMERICAN FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR FIELDS. New York: American Foundations Information Service , 7th ed., 1955, p. XXIX.
3.
See, e.g., Frederic P. Keppel, "The Responsibility of Endowments in the Promotion of Knowledge." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, LXXVII ( 1937), pp. 591-603.
4.
See, e.g., much of the testimony by foundation officials in the U.S. House of Representatives, Hearings before the Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations. 62nd Congress, 2nd session, 1952.
5.
See, e.g., F. Emerson Andrews, LEGAL INSTRUMENTS OF FOUNDATIONS. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1956, p. 12;
6.
also J. Steele Gow, "Notes on the Policies and Practices of Foundations." Biennial Report of the Falk Foundation, 1930-32, Part II, pp. 25-26.
7.
See, e.g., J.C. Kiger, OPERATING PRINCIPLES OF THE LARGER FOUNDATIONS . New York: Russell Sage Foundation , 1954, p. 112.
8.
7 H. Rowan Gaither, "The President's Review." The Ford Foundation Annual Report. New York: The Ford Foundation, 1956 , pp. 22-23.
9.
See, e.g., Dwight MacDonald, THE FORD FOUNDATION. New York: Reynal, 1956, p. 124.
10.
See, e.g., the warnings offered in The Study Committee, REPORT OF THE STUDY FOR FORD FOUNDATION ON POLICY AND PROGRAM. Detroit: The Ford Foundation, 1949, pp. 107 ff.
11.
Richard Colvard , "Foundations and Professions : The Organizational Defense of Autonomy." Administrative Science Quarterly, VI, 1961, pp. 167-84.
12.
Cf. Charles V. Kidd, AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES AND FEDERAL RESEARCH . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.
13.
See Alfred de Grazia, "The Science and Values of Administration ." Administrative Science Quarterly, V (1960), pp. 380-381.
14.
James B. Sears, PHILANTHROPY IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION. Washington: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education, Bulletin No. 6, 1922, p. 102.