Abstract
To have meaningful discussion of freedom requires an agreed definition of freedom in non-valuational terms. A number of hypotheses concerning interpersonal freedom are developed, most of which can be tested empirically using psychological, political or historical evidence. All may be considered rules of choices - "rules stipulating conditions under which it is rational for anyone to assign positive (or negative) value to some particular freedom relationship."
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.