This study explores the emotional and identity-related dimensions of disconnecting from smartwatch use in distance running. Using a collaborative autoethnographic approach, it examines the experiences of two middle-aged, non-elite runners transitioning from years of smartwatch reliance to a period of technological disengagement. The analysis investigates the emotional and psychological processes of this “cold turkey” journey, focusing on how runners navigate self-perception and autonomy when detached from digital tracking. Four themes emerged: (1) From Metrics to Movement: Rediscovering Freedom in Running, highlighting the liberation of running without performance metrics; (2) Beyond the Screen: Navigating Alternative Running Cues, illustrating how runners subconsciously replaced smartwatch feedback with environmental and bodily cues; (3) Running Without Proof: The Uncertainty of the Untracked Self, capturing the existential discomfort of running without recorded data; and (4) Unplugged and Exposed: The Vulnerability of Running Without a Watch, revealing the psychological attachment to wearable technology and the sense of loss in its absence. This study contributes to discussions on digital technology, self-identity, and the embodied running experience, revealing the tensions between self-tracking, autonomy, and identity validation in contemporary endurance sport.
AdamsT. E.HerrmannA. F. (2023). Good autoethnography. In Journal of Autoethnography (Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 1–9). University of California Press.
2.
Allen-CollinsonJ. (2012). Chapter 9 autoethnography: Situating personal sporting narratives in socio-cultural contexts. In YoungK.AtkinsonM. (Ed.), Qualitative research on sport and physical culture (Research in the Sociology of Sport, vol. 6, pp. 191–212). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
3.
Allen-CollinsonJ.HockeyJ. (2007). ‘Working out’ identity: Distance runners and the management of disrupted identity. Leisure Studies, 26(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360601053384
4.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (No. 10). Penguin.
BraunV.ClarkeV.WeateP. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In SmithB.SparkesA. C. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 191–205). Routledge.
7.
BrickwoodK. J.WatsonG.O’BrienJ.WilliamsA. D. (2019). Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(4), Article e11819.
8.
ClermontC. A.Duffett-LegerL.HettingaB. A.FerberR. (2019). Runners’ perspectives on ‘smart’ wearable technology and its use for preventing injury. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1597575
9.
FeelyC.CaulfieldB.LawlorA.SmythB. (2023, June26–29). Modelling the training practices of recreational marathon runners to make personalised training recommendations [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 31st ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, Limassol, Cyprus, pp. 183–193.
10.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). University of Massachusetts Press.
11.
FrankenR.BekhuisH.TolsmaJ. (2023). Kudos make you run! How runners influence each other on the online social network Strava. Social Networks, 72, 151–164.
12.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
13.
Hernández-RamírezR. (2017). Technology and self-modification: Understanding technologies of the self after Foucault. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 9(3), 45–57.
14.
JanssenM.WalravensR.ThibautE.ScheerderJ.BrombacherA.VosS. (2020). Understanding different types of recreational runners and how they use running-related technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), Article 2276.
15.
JensenM. M.MuellerF. (2014). Running with technology: Where are we heading? [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: The future of design, Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 527–530. ACM.
16.
JohanssonR. E.AdolphS. T.SwartJ.LambertM. I. (2020). Accuracy of GPS sport watches in measuring distance in an ultramarathon running race. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 15(2), 212–219.
17.
KjærupM.SkovM. B.NielsenP. A.KjeldskovJ.GerkenJ.ReitererH. (2021). Longitudinal studies in HCI research: A review of CHI publications from 1982–2019. In KarapanosE.GerkenJ.KjeldskovJ.SkovM. B. (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal HCI research (pp. 11–39). Springer International Publishing.
18.
KnavingK.WoźniakP.FjeldM.BjörkS. (2015, April18–23). Flow is not enough: Understanding the needs of advanced amateur runners to design motivation technology [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, pp. 2013–2022.
19.
KuruA. (2016). Exploring experience of runners with sports tracking technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(11), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1202461
20.
LeeB. K.GregoryD. (2008). Not alone in the field: Distance collaboration via the internet in a focused ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(3), 30–46.
21.
LevA. (2019). Becoming a long-distance runner – deriving pleasure and contentment in times of pain and bodily distress. Leisure Studies, 38(6), 790–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1640776
22.
LevA. (2020). Distance runners in a dys-appearance state–Reconceptualizing the perception of pain and suffering in times of bodily distress. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1734647
LevA. (2023). “Everyone does it but no one really wants to talk about it”: Roles and meanings of bodily secretions in the confines of distance running groups. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 16(4), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2023.2284696
25.
LevA. (2024). From combat boots to running shoes: The role of military service in shaping masculine identity in Israeli long-distance running groups. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 59(6), 868–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902231226409 (Original work published 2024)
26.
LevA.ZachS. (2018). Running between the raindrops: Running marathons and the potential to put marriage in jeopardy. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(5), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690218813803
27.
MaloneJ. J.LovellR.VarleyM. C.CouttsA. J. (2017). Unpacking the black box: Applications and considerations for using GPS devices in sport. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(s2), S2–S18.
28.
MarkulaP. (2004). “Tuning into one’s self”: Foucault’s technologies of the self and mindful fitness. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21(3), 302–321.
29.
MayR. A. B.Pattillo-McCoyM. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 65–87.
30.
MertalaP.PalsaL. (2023). Running free: Recreational runners’ reasons for non-use of digital sports technology. Sport in Society, 27(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2023.2246408
31.
MillerD. (2010). Stuff. Polity.
32.
MitchesonK. (2012). Foucault’s technologies of the self: Between control and creativity. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 43(1), 59–75.
33.
PostmaD.ReidsmaD.Van DeldenR.KarahanoğluA. (2024). From metrics to experiences: Investigating how sport data shapes the social context, self-determination and motivation of athletes. Interacting with Computers. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae012
34.
SeuterM.PfeifferM.BauerG.ZentgrafK.KrayC. (2017). Running with technology: Evaluating the impact of interacting with wearable devices on running movement. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), 1–17.
35.
ShcherbinaA.MattssonC. M.WaggottD.SalisburyH.ChristleJ. W.HastieT.WheelerM. T.AshleyE. A. (2017). Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 7(2), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm7020003
36.
ShipwayR.HollowayI.JonesI. (2013). Organisations, practices, actors, and events: Exploring inside the distance running social world. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690212442135
37.
ShipwayR.JonesI. (2008). The great suburban Everest: An ‘insiders’ perspective on experiences at the 2007 flora London Marathon. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 13(1), 61–77.
38.
ShipwayR.HollowayI. (2016). Health and the running body: Notes from an ethnography. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(1), 78–96.
39.
SparkesA. C. (2024). Autoethnography as an ethically contested terrain: Some thinking points for consideration. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 21(1), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2023.2293073
40.
TenenbaumG.Ben-ZionT.Amichai-HamburgerY.GalilyY.LevA. (2025). Smart sport watch usage: The dominant role of technology readiness over exercise motivation and sensation seeking. Technologies, 13(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13010024
41.
TholanderJ.NylanderS. (2015, April18–23). Snot, sweat, pain, mud, and snow: Performance and experience in the use of sports watches [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, pp. 2913–2922. ACM.
42.
TonerJ.Allen-CollinsonJ.JackmanP. C.JonesL.AddrisonJ. (2023). ‘I like to run to feel’: Embodiment and wearable mobile tracking devices in distance running. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(6), 805–818.
43.
Van MaanenJ. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
