The pandemic has had an unequal impact on the lives of Italian citizens. Italy, one of the worst-affected countries in Europe, has seen the most vulnerable and marginalized populations among the hardest hit by the pandemic’s secondary effects. The various intersecting forms of vulnerability, risk, and precarity have significantly affected the lives of Italian migrants. Evidence from 25 semi-structured interviews and conversations with social workers who work with migrants and various migrant groups, including naturalized citizens, EU long-term residents, and work permit holders, show that they face various livelihood problems, including employment precarity. It is argued that possessing a stable legal status does not automatically ensure access to welfare benefits, secure, reliable, high-quality, and permanent employment, nor does it exempt individuals from exploitative experiences in the job market, especially during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, due to systemic structural inequality and barriers.
AlbertiG.BessaI.HardyK.TrappmannV.UmneyC. (2018). In, against and beyond precarity: Work in insecure times. Work, Employment and Society, 32(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018762088
AndersonB. (2010). Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society, 24(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010362141
4.
AndersonB. (2015). Precarious work, immigration, and governance. In SchierupC.-U.MunckR.Likic-BrboricB.NeergaardA. (Eds.), Migration, precarity, and global governance (pp. 68–82). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198728863.003.0004
5.
AuerD. (2022). Firing discrimination: Selective labor market responses of firms during the COVID-19 economic crisis. PLoS One, 17(1), e0262337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262337
BettiE. (2018). Historicizing precarious work: Forty years of research in the social sciences and humanities. International Review of Social History, 63(2), 273–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859018000329
8.
BonizzoniP.DotseyS. (2021). Migration and legal precarity in the time of pandemic: Qualitative research on the Italian case. Dve Domovini/Two Homelands, 54(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.3986/dd.2021.2.09
9.
BourdieuP. (1963). Travail Et Travailleurs En Algérie. Mouton et Co.
10.
BourdieuP. (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the tyranny of the market. The New Press.
11.
CinalliM.DotseyS. (Eds.) (2025). The Three Challenges of Citizenship: Democracy, Market and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CranstonS. (2017). Expatriate as a “good” migrant: Thinking through skilled international migrant categories. Population, Space and Place, 23(6), 2058. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2058
13.
DotseyS. (2018). International migration and livelihood dynamics during the recent economic crisis: A study of Ghanaian migrants in the Como province, Italy. Migration and Development, 7(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2017.1345146
14.
DotseyS.ChiodelliF. (2021). Housing Precarity: A Fourfold Epistemological Lens for Dissecting the Housing Conditions of Migrants. City, 25(5–6), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2021.1979802
15.
DotseyS. (2021). Operatori sanitari stranieri e COVID-19 nell’UE: Gli ‘invisibili’ diventano ‘visibili’?Quaderni CNEL, 16, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32310.27206
16.
DotseyS.Lumley-SapanskiA.AmbrosiniM. (2023). COVID-19 and (Im)migrant Carers in Italy: The Production of Carer Precarity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), 6108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126108
17.
DotseyS. (2023). Foreign Healthcare Workers and COVID-19 in Europe: The Paradox of Unemployed Skilled Labour. Social Sciences, 12(4), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12040211
18.
DotseyS.AmbrosiniM. (2023). Migration, (il)legal status and housing precarity: Difficulties and coping strategies. Journal of Urban Affairs, 47(4), 1328–1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2224021
19.
DotseyS. (2024). COVID-19 and the precarious low-skilled workforce in the European Union: Time to call the shots?. International Journal of Population Studies, 10(3), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.2165
20.
DwyerP.HodkinsonS.LewisH.WaiteL. (2016). Socio-legal status and experiences of forced labour among asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 32(3), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2016.1175961
FasaniF.MazzaJ. (2020). A vulnerable workforce—Migrant workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/316665
24.
FixM.DemetriosG. P.BatalovaJ.TerrazasA.Yi-YingLinS.MittelstadtM. (2009). Migration and the global recession. A report commissioned by the BBC World Service. Migration Policy Institute. www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs//MPI-BBCreport-Sept09.pdf
25.
Gazzette Ufficiali. (2020). DECRETO-LEGGE 17 marzo 2020, n. 18—Normattiva. Misure di potenziamento del Servizio sanitario nazionale e di sostegno economico per famiglie, lavoratori e imprese connesse all'emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19. (20G00034) (GU Serie Generale n.70 del 17-03-2020). https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/17/20G00034/sg
KallebergA. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409074001
30.
KasmirS. (2018) Precarity. In SteinF. (Ed.) The Cambridge encyclopaedia of anthropology (pp. 1–14). Online. https://doi.org/10.29164/18precarity
31.
KissoonP. (2010). From persecution to destitution: A snapshot of asylum seekers’ housing and settlement experiences in Canada and the United Kingdom. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 8(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562940903575020
32.
KuhlmannE.FalkenbachM.KlasaK.PavoliniE.UngureanuM-I. (2020). Migrant carers in Europe in times of COVID-19: A call to action for European health workforce governance and a public health approach. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Suppl. 4), iv22–iv27. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa126
33.
LewisH.DwyerP.HodkinsonS.WaiteL. (2015). Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labor in the global North. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514548303
34.
LiuE.DeanC. A.ElderK. T. (2023). Editorial: The impact of COVID-19 on vulnerable populations. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1267723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267723
35.
LoriN. A. (2017). Statelessness, “in-between” statuses, and precarious citizenship. In ShacharA.BauböckR.BloemraadI.VinkM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of citizenship (pp.743–766). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.32
36.
Matilla-SantanderN.AhonenE.AlbinM.BaronS.BolíbarM.BosmansK.BurströmB.CuervoI.DavisL.GunnV.HåkanstaC.HemmingssonT.HogstedtC.JonssonJ.JuliàM.KjellbergK.KreshpajB.LewchukW.MuntanerC.. . . BodinT.; All Members of the PWR Study Consortium. (2021). COVID-19 and precarious employment: Consequences of the evolving crisis. International Journal of Health Services, 51(2), 226–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420986694
MöhringK.WeilandA.ReifenscheidM.NaumannE.WenzA.RettigT.KriegerUFikelM.CornesseC.BlomA. G. (2021). Inequality in employment trajectories and their socio-economic consequences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. SocArXiv, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/m95df
40.
MontagnaN. (2023). The two emergencies of migrant-related policies in Italy during the first wave of COVID-19: The spread of the virus and the workforce shortages. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 24, 1817–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01042-8
NeilsonB.RossiterN. (2006). From precarity to precariousness and back again: Labour, life, and unstable networks. The Fibreculture Journal, 5, 24.
43.
NeilsonB.RossiterN. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097796
PandeyK.ParreñasR. S.SabioG. S. (2021). Essential and expendable: Migrant domestic workers and the COVID-19 pandemic. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(10), 1287–1301. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211000396
PeroccoF. (2018). Work precarisation and new inequalities: The role of migration. In FranceschiniI.LoubereN. (Eds.), Gilded Age: Made in China Yearbook 2017 (1st ed.) (pp. 34–39). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/MIC.04.2018.02
48.
RuedaD. (2005). Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505149X
SanfeliciM. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on marginal migrant populations in Italy. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(10), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211000413
51.
ScullyB. (2016). Precarity north and south: A southern critique of guy standing. Global Labour Journal, 7(2), 16–173. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42002155
52.
StandingG. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury.
53.
UllahA. A.NawazF.ChattorajD. (2021). Locked up under lockdown: The COVID-19 pandemic and the migrant population. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100126
54.
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD). (2015). Multiple forms of migrant precarity—Beyond “Management” of migration to an integrated rights-based approach. Event Brief 03 December 2015. http://www.unrisd.org/eb3
VenturiniA. (1999). Do immigrants working illegally reduce the natives’ legal employment? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 12, 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050094
