This study explores the differences in reporting of instrumental identity theft to law enforcement among United States (US)-born White, non-Hispanic (NH), US-born racial/ethnic minority, and immigrant victims. Data from the 2021 National Crime Victimization Survey Identity Theft Supplement were used to complete descriptive and logistic regression analyses. Reporting of instrumental identity theft to law enforcement was least frequent among immigrant victims and most frequent among US-born racial/ethnic minority victims. Immigrant victims of instrumental identity theft were significantly less likely than US-born racial/ethnic minority victims to report their victimization to law enforcement. The most common reason for victims among all immigration groups to not report their instrumental identity theft victimization to law enforcement was another organization taking care of the issue. The percentage of victims who did not think about reporting their victimization to law enforcement was significantly higher among immigrant victims of instrumental identity theft and significantly lower among US-born White, NH victims. Implications of these findings are discussed.
BersaniB. E.PiqueroA. R. (2016). Examining systematic crime reporting bias across three immigrant generations: Prevalence, trends, and divergence in self-reported and official reported arrests. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 835–857.
2.
Betz-HamiltonA. (2023). Reporting behaviors of familiar identity theft victims: an empirical test of Black’s theory of law. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 1055–1065.
3.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2023). National Crime Victimization Survey: Identity theft supplement, [United States], 2021. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38501.v
4.
BurnesD.DeLiemaM.LangtonL. (2020). Risk and protective factors of identity theft victimization in the United States. Preventive Medicine Reports, 17, 101058.
5.
CebulaR. J.KochJ. V. (2008). The impact of undocumented immigration on ID theft in the United States: An empirical study. The Open Economics Journal, 1(1), 37–46.
6.
CebulaR. J.KochJ. V.UnemoriM. (2006). An empirical analysis of identity theft determinants in the U.S. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 7(6), 1–8.
7.
ChapinV. R. (2011). ¡Silencio! undocumented immigrant witnesses and the right to silence. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 17(1), 119–158.
8.
EspinozaL. E.EspinozaL. E.ResendizR.LealN.TalleffJ. L.Berlanga AguilarZ.RouseR.AnangweK. A. (2022). Intimate partner violence incidents reporting by female minorities in the United States. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 20(3), 209–226.
GolladayK. A. (2017). Reporting behaviors of identity theft victims: An empirical test of Black’s theory of law. Journal of Financial Crime, 24(1), 101–117.
12.
GreenB.GiesS.BobnisA.PiqueroN. L.PiqueroA. R.VelasquezE. (2020). The role of victim services for individuals who have experienced serious identity-based crime. Victims & Offenders, 15(6), 720–743.
13.
HarrellE. (2017). Victims of identity theft, 2014. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit14.pdf
14.
HarrellE. (2019). Victims of identity theft, 2016. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit16.pdf
15.
HarrellE. (2021). Victims of identity theft, 2018. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit18.pdf
16.
HarrellE. (2023). Victims of identity theft, 2021. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit21.pdf
17.
HarrellE.LangtonL. (2013). Victims of identity theft, 2012. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit12.pdf
18.
HoveyM.T. (2009). Oh, I’m sorry, did that identity belong to you: How ignorance, ambiguity, and identity theft create opportunity for immigration reform in the United States. Villanova Law Rev, 54(2), 369–410.
19.
Irvin-EricksonY. (2023). How does immigration status and citizenship affect identity theft victimization risk in the US? Insights from the 2018 National Crime Victimization Survey Identity theft supplement. Victims & Offenders, 18(7), 1401–1424.
20.
Irvin-EricksonY. (2024). Identity fraud victimization: A critical review of the literature of the past two decades. Crime Science, 13(1), 3.
KubrinC. E. (2014). Secure or insecure communities?Criminology & Public Policy, 13(2), 323–338.
23.
MacDonaldJ.SampsonR. J. (2012). The world in a city. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 641(1), 6–15.
24.
MaherC. A. (2024). Examining the association between citizenship and ethnicity on identity theft risk: Findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 49(3), 400–421.
25.
MartinezR.LeeM. T. (2000). On immigration and crime. Criminal Justice, 1(1), 486–524.
26.
MenjívarC.AbregoL. J. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American Immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1380–1421.
27.
MilesT. J.CoxA. B. (2014). Does immigration enforcement reduce crime? Evidence from secure communities. The Journal of Law and Economics, 57(4), 937–973.
MortensenR. W. (2009). Illegal, but not undocumented: Identity theft, document fraud, and illegal employment. Center for Immigration Studies. https://cis.org/Report/Illegal-Not-Undocumented
30.
OuseyG. C.KubrinC. E. (2018). Immigration and crime: Assessing a contentious issue. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 63–84.
ReynoldsD. (2022). Decisions, decisions: An analysis of identity theft victims’ reporting to police, financial institutions, and credit bureaus. Victims & Offenders, 18(7), 1373–1400.
33.
ReynsB. W.RandaR. (2015). Victim reporting behaviors following identity theft victimization: Results from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Crime & Delinquency, 63(7), 814–838.
34.
Salas-WrightC. P.VaughnM. G.GoingsT. C.MillerD. P.SchwartzS. J. (2018). Immigrants and mental disorders in the United States: New evidence on the healthy migrant hypothesis. Psychiatry Research, 267, 438–445.
SzaflarskiM.CubbinsL. A.YingJ. (2010). Epidemiology of alcohol abuse among US immigrant populations. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 13(4), 647–658.
38.
TreygerE.ChalfinA.LoefflerC. (2014). Immigration enforcement, policing, and crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(2), 285–322.
Van HookJ.BrownS. K.BeanF. D. (2006). For love or money? Welfare reform and immigrant naturalization. Social Forces, 85(2), 643–666.
41.
VaughnM. G.Salas-WrightC. P.MaynardB. R.QianZ.TerzisL.KusowA. M.DeLisiM. (2014). Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: Intergenerational discontinuity in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 483–490.
XieM.BaumerE. P. (2018). Reassessing the breadth of the protective benefit of immigrant neighborhoods: A multilevel analysis of violence risk by race, ethnicity, and labor market stratification. Criminology, 56(2), 302–332.
44.
XieM.BaumerE.P. (2021). Immigrant status, citizenship, and victimization risk in the United States: New findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology, 59(4), 610–644.
45.
ZatzM. S.SmithH. (2012). Immigration, crime, and victimization: Rhetoric and reality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 141–159.
