Compared to previous generations, young adults today report lower levels of trust in government, law enforcement, and their communities. This study investigates neighborhood factors influencing social trust among Arizona young adults during the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election. Through an analysis of online survey data for a sample of young adults (N = 1,376) who participated in the Arizona Youth Identity Project, we explore how neighborhood diversity, population density, racial identity, and political affiliation are associated with social trust and voting preferences. We find that Arizona young adults’ trust in police and their neighbors varies by neighborhood diversity and racial identity, with residents of mostly White neighborhoods reporting higher levels of trust. Additionally, support for Trump is highest among young adults who expressed high trust in local police. This study underscores and begins to unpack the interplay between race, space, and trust in shaping political identities and preferences.
AbascalM.BaldassarriD. (2015). Love thy neighbor? Ethnoracial diversity and trust reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, 121(3), 722–782.
2.
AllenT. T.WhittA. (2023). The influence of neighborhood characteristics on the public’s confidence in the police to protect them. Journal of Crime and Criminal Behavior, 3(2), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.47509/JCCB.2023.v03i02.08
AlvaradoS. E.CooperstockA. (2024). The echo of neighborhood disadvantage: Multigenerational contextual hardship and adult income for Whites, Blacks, and Latinos. City & Community, 23(1), 47–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841231179436
5.
AveryE. E.HermsenJ. M.KuhlD. C. (2021). Toward a better understanding of perceptions of neighborhood social cohesion in rural and urban places. Social Indicators Research, 157(2), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02664-0
6.
BerningC. C.ZillerC. (2017). Social trust and radical right-wing populist party preferences. Acta Politica, 52(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2015.28
7.
BjørnskovM. (2008). Social trust and fractionalization: A possible reinterpretation. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn004
8.
BoardmanJ. D.Saint OngeJ. M. (2005). Neighborhoods and adolescent development. Children, Youth and Environments, 15(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2005.0083
9.
CagneyK. A.GlassT. A.SkarupskiK. A.BarnesL. L.SchwartzB. S.LeonC. F. (2009). Neighborhood-level cohesion and disorder: Measurement and validation in two older adult urban populations. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 64(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn041
10.
CarvalhoA. A. S.MizaelT. M.SampaioA. A. S. (2022). Racial prejudice and police stops: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00578-4
Department of Justice. (2024). Investigation of the city of phoenix and the phoenix police department. United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1355866/dl?inline
14.
DoudsK.WuJ. (2018). Trust in the Bayou City: Do racial segregation and discrimination matter for generalized trust?Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 4(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649217717741
15.
DrakulichK.HaganJ.JohnsonD.WozniakK. H. (2017). Race, justice, policing, and the 2016 American presidential election. DuBois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 14(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X1600031X
16.
EvangelistK. (2021). Three essays on race and trust in the United States [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan]. https://doi.org/10.7302/3119
17.
FreitagM.BauerP. C. (2013). Testing for measurement equivalence in surveys: Dimensions of social trust across cultural contexts. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(S1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs064
18.
GelmanA. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27(15), 2865–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3107
Godinez PuigL. (2024). White fortressing: How racial threat and conservatism lead to the formation of local governments. Urban Affairs Review, 60(1), 16–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874231197996
21.
GlanvilleJ. L.ShiQ. (2020). The extension of particularized trust to generalized and out-group trust: The constraining role of collectivism. Social Forces, 98(4), 1801–1828. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz114
GusevaA.Rona-TasA. (2001). Uncertainty, risk, and trust: Russian and American credit card markets compared. American Sociological Review, 66(5), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088951
KaterL.MartinN. D. (2024, this issue). Diversity in civic engagement: Political priorities and participation of Arizona college students. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241284407
28.
KhanM. (2018). Post-stratification weighting adjustment technique for reducing bias in volunteer panel web surveys. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 6(2), 720–724.
29.
LightM. T.ThomasJ. T. (2019). Segregation and violence reconsidered: Do Whites benefit from residential segregation?American Sociological Review, 84(4), 690–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312241985873
30.
LuckinghamB. (1994). Minorities in Phoenix: A profile of Mexican American, Chinese American, and African American communities, 1860–1992. University of Arizona Press.
MartinN. D. (2024, this issue). Young adults in turbulent times: Findings from the Arizona Youth Identity Project. American Behavioral Scientist.
33.
MaselkoJ.HughesC.CheneyR. (2011). Religious social capital: Its measurement and utility in the study of the social determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 73(5), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.019
34.
MasseyD. S. (2016). Segregation and the perpetuation of disadvantage. In BradyD.BurtonL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 369–405). Oxford University Press.
MewesJ.FairbrotherM.GiordanoG. N.WuC.WilkesR. (2021). Experiences matter: A longitudinal study of individual-level sources of declining social trust in the United States. Social Science Research, 95, 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102537
37.
Moffett-BateauA. J. (2024). “I can’t vote if I don’t leave my apartment”: The problem of neighborhood violence and its impact on the political behavior of Black American Women living below the poverty line. Urban Affairs Review, 60(1), 73–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874231162930
38.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00932.x
39.
NordbergA.CrawfordM. R.PraetoriusR. T.HatcherS. S. (2016). Exploring minority youths’ police encounters: A qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0415-3
40.
Pearson-MerkowitzS. (2012). The limits of the homogeneity model: Segregation and civic engagement in Latino communities. American Politics Research, 40(4), 701–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X12440720
PeytonK.Sierra-ArévaloM.RandD. G. (2019). A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(40), 19894–19898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910157116
PryceD. K.TimeV. M. (2023). Examining the predictors of the public’s trust in the police using local data. Criminal Justice Studies, 36(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2023.2233676
45.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
46.
ReillyT.SalitJ. S.AliO. H. (2022). The independent voter. Routledge.
47.
Rodríguez-PoseA.LeeN.LippC. (2021). Golfing with Trump. Social capital, decline, inequality, and the rise of populism in the US. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab026
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
50.
ShareckM.AubéE.SersliS. (2023). Neighborhood physical and social environments and social inequalities in health in older adolescents and young adults: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(8), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085474
SchuckA. M. (2020). Examining the community consequences of arrests for low-level criminal activity. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22238
53.
TorribleC. (2022). Trust in the police and policing by consent in turbulent times. Safer Communities, 21(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-08-2021-0036
54.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.CarterN. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents 1972–2012. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1914–1923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614545
55.
TwengeJ. M. (2023). Generations: The real differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and what they mean for America’s future. Simon and Schuster.
56.
UslanerE.ConleyR. (2003). Civic engagement and particularized trust: The ties that bind people to their ethnic communities. American Politics Research, 31, 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03031004001
57.
van HoornA. (2014). Trust radius versus trust level: Radius of trust as a distinct trust construct. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1256–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414555398
58.
VitroC.ClarkD. A.ShermanC.HeitzegM. M.HicksB. M. (2022). Attitudes about police and race in the United States 2020–2021: Mean-level trends and associations with political attitudes, psychiatric problems, and COVID-19 outcomes. PLoS One, 17(7), e0271954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271954
59.
VolpeJ. D. (2021). Fight: How Gen Z is channeling their fear and passion to save America. St. Martin’s Press.
60.
WelchM. R.RiveraR. E.ConwayB. P.YonkoskiJ.LuptonP. M.GiancolaR. (2005). Determinants and consequences of social trust. Sociological Inquiry, 75(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00132.x
61.
WheelockD.StroshineM. S.O’HearM. (2019). Disentangling the relationship between race and attitudes toward the police: Police contact, perceptions of safety, and procedural justice. Crime & Delinquency, 65(7), 941–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718811928
62.
WrightJ. E.GaozhaoD.DukesK.TempletonD. (2023). The power of protest on policing: Black Lives Matter protest and civilian evaluation of the police. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13498
63.
WroeA. (2016). Economic insecurity and political trust in the United States. American Politics Research, 44(1), 1131–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15597745
64.
WuY.SunI. Y.TriplettR. A. (2009). Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802119950
65.
YamagishiT.YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397
66.
YuQ.SalvadorC. E.MelaniI.BergM. K.NeblettE. W.KitayamaS. (2021). Racial residential segregation and economic disparity jointly exacerbate COVID-19 fatality in large American cities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1494(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14567
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
