Although anti-feminist discourses and practices are often associated with “right-wing” governments, self-proclaimed “leftist” regimes can also be organized around patriarchal ideas. In this article, I analyze how the Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua has employed gendered ideologies to consolidate and legitimate its political power. While the Ortega-Murillo regime initially used elite pact-making to gain control of Nicaragua’s legal institutions, their latter strategies, which included alliances with religious conservatives, threats and intimidation, and legal mechanisms, were mainly focused on restructuring and pacifying civil society. Within this process, targeting feminist ideas and feminist organizations has been a central component of their autocratic toolkit.
AwadallaC. (2023). Authoritarian populism and patriarchal logics: Nicaragua’s engendered politics. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(2), 701–723.
Ben-GhiatR. (2020). Strongmen: Mussolini to the present. W.W. Norton and Company.
10.
BrownW. (1992). Finding the man in the state. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 7–34.
11.
BubenR.KoubaK. (2020). Nicaragua in 2019: The surprising resilience of authoritarianism in the aftermath of regime crisis. Revista de Ciencia Política, 40(2), 431–455.
12.
BushS. S.ZetterbergP. (2024). Gender equality and authoritarian regimes: New directions for research. Politics & Gender, 20(1), 212–216.
13.
BjarnegårdE.ZetterbergP. (2022). How autocrats weaponize women’s rights. Journal of Democracy, 33(2), 60–75.
14.
Cabrales DomínguezS. M. (2020). The Catholic Church and the 2018 wave of protests in Nicaragua [Master’s Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, (Unpublished)].
Centro Nicaragüense de Derechos Humanos. (2018). CENIDH denuncia violaciones sistemáticas a los derechos humanos de los nicaragüenses por el régimen dictatorial de Daniel Ortega y Rosario Murillo en el periodo del 16 de mayo al 18 de junio del 2018. https://www.cenidh.org/media/documents/docfile/Informe_3.pdf
17.
ChinchillaN. (1990). Revolutionary popular feminism in Nicaragua. Gender & Society, 4(3), 370–397.
CindogluD.UnalD. (2017). Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of “New Turkey.”European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 39–54.
20.
ChenowethEMarksZ. (2022). Revenge of the patriarchs: Why autocrats fear women essays. Foreign Affairs, 101(2), 103–116.
DammertL.MaloneM. F. T. (2020). From community policing to political police in Nicaragua. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 110, 79–99.
33.
DelgadoV. (2003). The experiences and achievements of the women’s network against violence. Revista Envío. Central American University. https://www.revistaenvio.org/articulo/2083
34.
DoğangünG. (2020). Gender climate in authoritarian politics: A comparative study of Russia and Turkey. Politics & Gender, 16(1), 258–284.
35.
DonnoD.KreftA.-K. (2019). Authoritarian institutions and women’s rights. Comparative Political Studies, 52(5), 720–753.
EwigC. (1999). The strengths and limits of the NGO women’s movement model: Shaping Nicaragua’s democratic institutions. Latin American Research Review, 34(3), 75–102.
39.
GaleanoL. (2008). Refuerzan seguridad en rotondas. El Nuevo Diario.
GurievS.TreismanD. (2022). Spin dictators: The changing face of Tyranny in the 21st century. Princeton University Press.
42.
HeumannS. (2014). Gender, sexuality, and politics: Rethinking the relationship between feminism and Sandinismo in Nicaragua. Social Politics, 21(2), 290–314.
43.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (2018). Serious human rights violations in the context of social protests in Nicaragua. Organization of American States. www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/Nicaragua2018-en.pdf
JubbN. (2014). Love, family values and reconciliation for all, but what about rights, justice and citizenship for women? The FSLN, the women’s movement, and violence against women in Nicaragua. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 33(3), 289–304.
46.
KampwirthK. (2008). Abortion, antifeminism, and the return of Daniel Ortega: In Nicaragua, leftist politics?Latin American Perspectives, 35(6), 122–136.
47.
KaulN. (2021). The misogyny of authoritarians in contemporary democracies. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1619–1645.
Martí i PuigS. (2010). The adaptation of the FSlN: Daniel Ortega’s leadership and democracy in Nicaragua. Latin American Politics and Society, 52(4), 79–106.
55.
MartínezM. (2008, December21). ONGs perseguidas en 2008. El Nuevo Diario.
NeumannP. (2018). Gender-based violence and the patrimonial state in Nicaragua: The Rise and Fall of Ley 779. Cahiers des Amériques Latines, 87, 69–90.
65.
PereiraA. (2016). Is the Brazilian state “Patrimonial”?Latin American Perspectives, 43(2), 135–152.
66.
PrevostG. (1995). The Nicaraguan revolution-six years after the Sandinista electoral defeat. Third World Quarterly, 17(2), 307–328.
SandersR.JenkinsL. D. (2023). Patriarchal populism: The Conservative Political Action Coalition (CPAC) and the transnational politics of authoritarian anti-feminism. The International Spectator, 58(3), 1–19.
72.
ScheppeleK. L. (2018). Autocratic legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 545–583.
ViternaJ.FallonK. M. (2008). Democratization, women’s movements, and gender-equitable states: A framework for comparison. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 668–689.
