This study investigates sport fandom’s major dimensions: star attraction and team identification, analyzing transfers of soccer players Ronaldo and Messi. Data from teams’ official social media (Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter/X) using scripts inform our analysis. Results reveal star attraction’s significant prominence over team identification. Instagram, linked to celebrity culture and star fandom, displays the highest online growth, emphasizing star attraction’s centrality in sport fandom on social media. Implications for fans, teams, and marketers are discussed, emphasizing the need for nuanced understanding to enhance engagement and marketing. Overall, valuable insights into sport fandom’s complex dynamics in the social media age emerge.
AchenR. M.KaczorowskiJ.HorsmannT.KetzlerA. (2020). Comparing organizational content and fan interaction on Twitter and Facebook in United States professional sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(5), 358–375.
2.
AnagnostopoulosC.ParganasP.ChadwickS.FentonA. (2018). Branding in pictures: Using Instagram as a brand management tool in professional team sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(4), 413–438.
3.
BaekY. M.BaeY.JangH. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(7), 512–517.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497.
5.
BrandesL.FranckE.NüeschS. (2008). Local heroes and superstars: An empirical analysis of star attraction in German soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(3), 266–286.
6.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1991). The positive social and self concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 15(2), 115–127.
7.
ChungS.ChoH. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4): 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001
8.
ChungE.FarrellyF.BeverlandM. B.KarpenI. O. (2018). Loyalty or liability: Resolving the consumer fanaticism paradox. Marketing Theory, 18(1), 3–30.
9.
CohenJ. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication & Society, 6(2), 191–202.
10.
CohenJ. (2014). Mediated relationships and social life: Current research on fandom, parasocial relationships, and identification. Media and social life. In Electronic media research series (pp. 142–156). Routledge.
11.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310.
12.
DibbleJ. L.HartmannT.RosaenS. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44.
13.
DittmarH.HalliwellE.IveS. (2006). Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5-to 8-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 283.
14.
DollesH.SödermanS.HoegeleD.SchmidtS. L.TorglerB. (2014). Superstars and disloyal football fans: Factors influencing attraction to competition. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 4(4), 298–316.
15.
EastmanS. T.LandA. M. (1997). The best of both worlds: Sports fans find good seats at the bar. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 21(2), 156–178.
16.
FerchaudA.GrzesloJ.OrmeS.LaGroueJ. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88–96.
17.
GalilyY. (2018). Artificial intelligence and sports journalism: Is it a sweeping change?. Technology in Society, 54, 47–51.
18.
GalilyY.PackS.TamirI. (2024) Spectator sport and fan behavior: A Sequel. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1414407. https://doi.org.10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414407
19.
GibsonH.WillmingC.HoldnakA. (2002). “We’re Gators . . . not just Gator fans”: Serious leisure and University of Florida football. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(4), 397–425.
20.
GodesD.MayzlinD. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560.
21.
GrimmerC. G.ClavioG. (2019). Sport pro= Twitter pro?-How soccer stars use Twitter at the height of their career. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 19(3–4), 161–183.
22.
HarringtonS.HighfieldT.BrunsA. (2013). More than a backchannel: Twitter and television. Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 10(1), 405–409.
23.
HartmannT. (2016). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 131–144). Routledge.
24.
HaughB. R.WatkinsB. (2016). Tag me, tweet me if you want to reach me: An investigation into how sports fans use social media. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(3), 278–293.
25.
HayatT.GalilyY.Samuel-AzranT. (2020). Can celebrity athletes burst the echo chamber bubble? The case of LeBron James and Lady Gaga. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(7), 900–914.
26.
HayatT.GalilyY.Samuel-AzranT. (2023). The Twitter following for the Beijing Winter Olympics and the Russian–Chinese fans’ alliance: A social network analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(10), 1230–1245.
27.
HayatT.HershkovitzA.Samuel-AzranT. (2019). The independent reinforcement effect: The role diverse social ties play in the credibility assessment process. Public Understanding of Science, 28(2), 201–217.
28.
HayatT.Samuel-AzranT. (2017). “You too, second screeners?” Second screeners’ echo chambers during the 2016 US elections primaries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 291–308.
29.
HayatT.LesserO.Samuel-AzranT. (2017). Gendered discourse patterns on online social networks: A social network analysis perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 132–139.
30.
HortonD.Richard WohlR. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
31.
HumphreysB. R.JohnsonC. (2020). The effect of superstars on game attendance: Evidence from the NBA. Journal of Sports Economics, 21(2), 152–175.
32.
KanazawaS. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 167–171.
33.
KassingJ. W.SandersonJ. (2009). “You’re the kind of guy that we all want for a drinking buddy”: Expressions of parasocial interaction on Floydlandis.com. Western Journal of Communication, 73(2), 182–203.
34.
KoenigstorferJ.Groeppel-KleinA.KunkelT. (2010). The attractiveness of national and international football leagues: Perspectives of fans of “star clubs” and “underdogs.”European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(2), 127–163.
35.
LanterJ. R.BlackburnJ. Z. (2004). The championship effect on college students’ identification and university affiliation [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
36.
LevA.GalilyY.EldadiO.TenenbaumG. (2020). Deconstructing celebratory acts following goal scoring among elite professional football players. PLoS One, 15, Article e0238702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238702
37.
LeventalO.CarmiU.LevA. (2021). Jinx, control, and the necessity of adjustment: Superstitions among football fans. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 740645.
38.
LeventalO.LaorT.GalilyY. (2023). The 21st century Globetrotters’ fans: The case of Israeli transnational football Supporters’ communities before and during the pandemic. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(11), 1340–1357.
39.
LinvilleP. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 663.
40.
MacDonaldG.LearyM. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202.
41.
MaelF. A.AshforthB. E. (2001). Identification in work, war, sports, and religion: Contrasting the benefits and risks. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(2), 197–222.
42.
MaltbyJ.DayL.McCutcheonL. E.MartinM. M.CayanusJ. L. (2004). Celebrity worship, cognitive flexibility, and social complexity. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1475–1482.
43.
MaltbyJ.GilesD. C.BarberL.McCutcheonL. E. (2005). Intense-personal celebrity worship and body image: Evidence of a link among female adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 17–32.
McCutcheonL. E.AsheD. D.HouranJ.MaltbyJ. (2003). A cognitive profile of individuals who tend to worship celebrities. The Journal of Psychology, 137(4), 309–322.
46.
MengM. D.StavrosC.WestbergK. (2015). Engaging fans through social media: implications for team identification. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 5(3), 199–217.
47.
MertenS.ReulandN.WinandM.MarlierM. (2024). Fan identification in football: Professional football players and clubs competing for fan loyalty. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 169–187.
48.
PangerG. (2016). Reassessing the Facebook experiment: Critical thinking about the validity of Big Data research. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1108–1126.
49.
Samuel-AzranT.HayatT.GalilyY. (2023). Global sport protest activism is exclusive to the global elite: A case study of# boycottqatar2022. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(10), 1179–1193.
50.
Samuel-AzranT.YarchiM.WolfsfeldG. (2015). Aristotelian rhetoric and Facebook success in Israel’s 2013 election campaign. Online Information Review, 39, 149–162.
51.
SandersonJ. (2008). “You are the type of person that children should look up to as a hero”: Parasocial interaction on 38pitches.com. International Journal of Sport Communication, 1(3), 337–360.
52.
SandersonJ.EmmonsB. (2014). Extending and withholding forgiveness to Josh Hamilton: Exploring forgiveness within parasocial interaction. Communication & Sport, 2(1), 24–47.
53.
SunT. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sport teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33(2), 194.
TajfelH. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
56.
TurelO.SerenkoA. (2012). The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(5), 512–528.
57.
ValeL.FernandesT. (2018). Social media and sports: Driving fan engagement with football clubs on Facebook. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 37–55.
58.
WangQ.FinkE. L.CaiD. A. (2008). Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Quarterly, 56(1), 87–109.
59.
WannD. L. (2006). Understanding the positive social psychological benefits of sport team identification: The team identification-social psychological health model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(4), 272.
60.
WannD. L.DimmockJ. A.GroveJ. R. (2003). Generalizing the team identification-psychological health model to a different sport and culture: The case of Australian rules football. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 289.
61.
WannD. L.HackathornJ.ShermanM. R. (2017). Testing the team identification–social psychological health model: Mediational relationships among team identification, sport fandom, sense of belonging, and meaning in life. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 21(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000066
62.
WannD. L.PierceS. (2005). The relationship between sport team identification and social well-being: Additional evidence supporting the team identification-social psychological health model. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(1), 117–124.
63.
WannD. L.WaddillP. J.PolkJ.WeaverS. (2011). The team identification–social psychological health model: Sport fans gaining connections to others via sport team identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(1), 75.
64.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
YukselM.LabrecqueL. I. (2016). “Digital buddies”: Parasocial interactions in social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(4), 305–320.
67.
ZillmannD.BryantJ.SapolskyB. S. (1989). Enjoyment from sports spectatorship. Sports, Games, and Play: Social and Psychological Viewpoints, 2, 241–278.
