This article is a qualitative study of a Christian Right Party in Norway and its origin and growth as a reaction against the liberalization of laws pertaining to same-sex marriage, the adoption of children by same-sex couples, and other family-related matters. In order to analyze the contribution of religion in this political party, and in the movement from which it developed, the article introduces the concept of theological opportunity structures, which is a specific type of discursive opportunity structure. The concept of theological opportunity structures foregrounds the role of religious beliefs, doctrines, and narratives in politics as opposed to the institutional dimensions of religion. It is offered as a theoretical construct to improve analysis of the role of religion in politics.
AlthoffA. (2018). Right-wing populism and religion in Germany: Conservative Christians and the Alternative for Germany (AfD). Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik, 2(2), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-018-0027-9
2.
ÅsenØ. (2008). Kjønnsnøytral ekteskapslov—pressgruppers prestisjeprosjekt og politikeres påvirkelighet. Living Water Mission.
3.
BrekkeT. (2012). Fundamentalism: Prophecy and protest in an age of globalization (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
4.
ColantoneI.StanigP. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358
EisingaR.FellingA.PetersJ. (1990). Church involvement, prejudice and nationalism: A research note on the curvilinear relationship between church involvement and ethnocentrism in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 31(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511568
7.
FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A.RuchtD.GerhardsJ. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613685
8.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S57–S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319
GleditschK. S.RuggeriA. (2010). Political opportunity structures, democracy, and civil warJournal of Peace Research, 47(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310362293
11.
HennigA. (2018). Political genderphobia in Europe: Accounting for right-wing political-religious alliances against gender-sensitive education reforms since 2012. Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik, 2(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-018-0026-x
12.
HolbergS. E. (2007). Kampen om de kristne velgere: Mellom tro og tradisjon. In AardalB. (Ed.), Norske velgere. En studie av stortingsvalget. NW Damm & Søn.
13.
JacobsM. A.SausM. (2012). Child welfare services for indigenous populations: A comparison of child welfare histories, policies, practices and laws for American Indians and Norwegian Sámis. Child Care in Practice, 18(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2012.683777
KoopmansR.StathamP. (1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756
16.
KoopmansR.OlzakS. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/386271
17.
LeimgruberU. (2020). Hostility toward gender in Catholic and Political Right-Wing Movements. Religions (Basel, Switzerland), 11(6), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060301
18.
MarzoukiN.McDonnellD.RoyO. (2016). Saving the people: How populists hijack religion. Oxford University Press.
OeschD. (2008). Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review, 29(3), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107088390
22.
OliveiraC. R.CarvalhaisE. I. (2016). Immigrants’ political claims in Portugal: Confronting the political opportunity structure with perceptions and discourses. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(5), 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1259487
23.
OrtegaR. M.FallerK. C. (2011). Training child welfare workers from an intersectional cultural humility perspective: a paradigm shift. Child Welfare, 90(5), 27–49.
24.
RodriguezC. M.HendersonR. C. (2010). Who spares the rod? Religious orientation, social conformity, and child abuse potential. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(2), 84–94.
25.
RomneyA. K.WellerS. C.BatchelderW. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00020
26.
RydgrenJ. (Ed.) (2013). Class politics and the radical right. Routledge.
SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (Eds.) (2019). The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements. John Wiley & Sons.
30.
TaylorC. (2007). A secular age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
31.
van den BergM. (2017). Rings for the rainbow family: Religious opposition to the introduction of same-sex marriage in Sweden. Theology & Sexuality, 23(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2017.1351125
