This study identifies life dissatisfaction and related political attitudes as predictors of right-wing populist voting in Europe. Using survey data from 14 countries (2012–2018, N = 54,263), we find that life dissatisfaction links to negative attitudes on immigration and, in many countries, also to political distrust, and relates through these attitudes to a right-wing populist vote. By proposing a well-being framework to explain right-wing populist demand, we broaden the focus of discontent taken in previous research on psychological antecedents of populism. We suggest that low subjective well-being among the electorate has political relevance and could become a threat to the future of liberal democracy.
AbtsK.RogenhoferJ. (2024). Three-pronged ressentiment: How status insecurity, relative deprivation, and powerlessness mediate between social positions and populist attitudes. American Behavioural Scientist. Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test. Part Three”. Online First.
2.
ArzheimerK. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 259–275.
3.
BakkerB. N.RooduijnM.SchumacherG. (2016). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 302–320.
4.
BatzC.TayL. (2018). Gender differences in subjective well-being. In DienerE.OishiS.TayL. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being (pp. 359–372). DEF Publishers.
BetzH.-G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Springer.
7.
BittmannF. (2021). Beyond the U-shape: Mapping the functional form between age and life satisfaction for 81 countries utilizing a cluster procedure. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2343–2359.
8.
BoesS.WinkelmannR. (2010). The effect of income on general life satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 111–128.
9.
BonikowskiB. (2017). Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S181–S213.
10.
BoniniA. N. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87(2), 223–236.
11.
BornschierS.KriesiH. (2012). The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics. In RydgrenJ. (Ed.), Class politics and the radical right (pp. 10–29). Routledge.
12.
BrownR. (2011). Prejudice: Its social psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
13.
CapelosT.KatsanidouA. (2018). Reactionary politics: Explaining the psychological roots of Anti preferences in European integration and immigration debates. Political Psychology, 39(6), 1271–1288.
14.
CrossS.MarkusH. (1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34(4), 230–255.
15.
CumminsR. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 225–256.
16.
D’AmbrosioC.FrickJ. R. (2007). Income satisfaction and relative deprivation: An empirical link. Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 497–519.
17.
De CuyperN.De WitteH. (2007). Job insecurity in temporary versus permanent workers: Associations with attitudes, well-being, and behaviour. Work & Stress, 21(1), 65–84.
18.
del Mar Salinas-JiménezM.ArtésJ.Salinas-JiménezJ. (2011). Education as a positional good: A life satisfaction approach. Social Indicators Research, 103(3), 409–426.
19.
DienerE. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.
20.
DienerE. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.
21.
DienerE. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597.
22.
EdwardsK. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 202–216.
23.
ElchardusM.SpruytB. (2016). Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), 111–133.
24.
EnyediZ. (2020). Right-wing authoritarian innovations in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 363–377.
25.
ErisenC. (2024), Emotional predictors of populism in the case of Turkey. American Behavioral Scientist. Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test. Part Three”. Online First.
26.
EsaiassonP.DahlbergS.KokkonenA. (2020). In pursuit of happiness: Life satisfaction drives political support. European Journal of Political Research, 59, 25–44.
27.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412.
28.
FilsingerM. (2024). How anger shapes the relationship between social isolation and populist attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist. Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test. Part Two”. Online First.
29.
FlavinP.KeaneM. J. (2011). Life satisfaction and political participation: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63–78.
30.
FleckerJ.HentgesG.BalazsG. (2007). Potentials of political subjectivity and the various approaches to the extreme right: Findings of the qualitative research. In FleckerJ. (Ed.), Changing working life and the appeal of the extreme right (pp. 35–62). Ashgate.
31.
FordR.JenningsW. (2020). The changing cleavage politics of Western Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 295–314.
32.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
33.
FreyB. S.StutzerA. (2010). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton University Press.
34.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S57–S84.
35.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2019). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879947
36.
GieblerH.HirschM.SchürmannB.VeitS. (2020). Discontent with what? Linking self-centered and society-centered discontent to populist party support. Political Studies, 69(4), 900–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720932115
37.
Golec de ZavalaA.LantosD. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 273–278.
38.
GreenE. G.SarrasinO.BaurR.FaselN. (2016). From stigmatized immigrants to radical right voting: A multilevel study on the role of threat and contact. Political Psychology, 37(4), 465–480.
39.
GrünC.HauserW.RheinT. (2010). Is any job better than no job? Life satisfaction and re-employment. Journal of Labor Research, 31(3), 285–306.
40.
GuisoL.HerreraH.MorelliM.SonnoT. (2017). Populism: Demand and supply. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
41.
HameleersM.BosL.De VreeseC. H. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900.
42.
HantraisL. (1999). Contextualization in cross-national comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2(2), 93–108.
43.
HawkinsK. A.CarlinR. E.LittvayL.KaltwasserC. R. (2018). The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis. Routledge.
44.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
45.
HealyA.MalhotraN. (2013). Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 285–306.
46.
HelliwellJ. F.HuangH.GroverS.WangS. (2014). Empirical linkages between good government and national well-being. National Bureau of Economic Research.
HetheringtonM. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.
49.
HoogheL.MarksG. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.
50.
IvarsflatenE. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23.
51.
KavanaghN. M.MenonA.HeinzeJ. E. (2021). Does health vulnerability predict voting for right-wing populist parties in Europe?American Political Science Review, 115(3), 1104–1109.
52.
KitscheltH. (1995). Formation of party cleavages in post-communist democracies: Theoretical propositions. Party Politics, 1(4), 447–472.
53.
KriesiH.GrandeE.LachatR.DolezalM.BornschierS.FreyT. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956.
54.
KüpperB.WolfC.ZickA. (2010). Social status and anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: An examination from the perspective of social dominance theory. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 4(2), 205–219.
55.
LammersJ.BaldwinM. (2020). Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right-wing populist rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(5), 943–954.
56.
LiberiniF.RedoanoM.ProtoE. (2017). Happy voters. Journal of Public Economics, 146, 41–57.
57.
LindholmA. (2020). Does subjective well-being affect political participation?Swiss Journal of Sociology, 46(3), 467–488.
58.
LindholmA.RapeliL. (2023). Is the unhappy citizen a populist citizen? Linking subjective well-being to populist and nativist attitudes. European Political Science Review, 15(3), 465–481.
59.
LucassenG.LubbersM. (2012). Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threats. Comparative Political Studies, 45(5), 547–574.
60.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J.FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
61.
MarcusG. E. (2000). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 221–250.
62.
MattilaM.RapeliL. (2018). Just sick of it? Health and political trust in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 116–134.
63.
McLarenL. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81(3), 909–936.
64.
MiletiF. P.PlombF. (2016). Addressing the link between socio-economic change and right-wing populism and extremism: A critical review of the European literature. In FleckerJ. (Ed.), Changing working life and the appeal of the extreme right (pp. 21–46). Routledge.
65.
MocanN.RaschkeC. (2016). Economic well-being and anti-semitic, xenophobic, and racist attitudes in Germany. European Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 1–63.
66.
MuddeC. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
67.
MutzD. C. (2007). Political psychology and choice. In DaltonR. J.KlingemannH.-D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of political behaviour. Oxford University Press.
68.
MutzD. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115
69.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?Psychological Science, 19(6), 565–572.
70.
NetoF. (1995). Predictors of satisfaction with life among second generation migrants. Social Indicators Research, 35(1), 93–116.
71.
NeupertS. D.BellingtierJ. A.SmithE. L. (2021). Emotional reactivity changes to daily stressors surrounding the 2016 US presidential election. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2832–2842.
72.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
OeschD. (2008). Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review, 29(3), 349–373.
75.
OeschD.LippsO. (2012). Does unemployment hurt less if there is more of it around? A panel analysis of life satisfaction in Germany and Switzerland. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 955–967.
76.
OjedaL.CastilloL. G.Rosales MezaR.Piña-WatsonB. (2014). Mexican Americans in higher education: Cultural adaptation and marginalization as predictors of college persistence intentions and life satisfaction. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 13(1), 3–14.
77.
PeduzziP.ConcatoJ.KemperE.HolfordT. R.FeinsteinA. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379.
78.
PirralhaA. (2017). Political participation and wellbeing in the Netherlands: Exploring the causal links. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12(2), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9463-x
79.
PoutvaaraP.SteinhardtM. F. (2018). Bitterness in life and attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 471–490.
80.
RicoG. (2024). Ideological identification, threat type, and differences in how anger and fear relate to anti-immigrant and populist attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist. Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test. Part Three”. Online First.
81.
RicoG.AnduizaE. (2019). Economic correlates of populist attitudes: An analysis of nine European countries in the aftermath of the great recession. Acta Politica, 54(3), 371–397.
82.
RooduijnM. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368.
83.
RooduijnM.Van Der BrugW.De LangeS. L. (2016). Expressing or fueling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43, 32–40.
84.
RooduijnM.Van KesselS.FroioC.PirroA.De LangeS. L.HalikiopoulouD.LewisP.MuddeC.TaggartP. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org
85.
RydgrenJ. (2008). Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 47(6), 737–765.
86.
SaniF. (2010). Self-continuity: Individual and collective perspectives. Psychology Press.
87.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.
88.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232.
89.
SorokaS. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press.
90.
SpieringsN.ZasloveA. (2017). Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: Explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties. West European Politics, 40(4), 821–847.
91.
StaerkléC.GreenE. G. (2018). Right-wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28(6), 430–445.
92.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In HatchM. J.SchultzM. (Eds.), Organizational Identity: A Reader (pp. 56–65). Oxford University Press.
93.
TiedensL. Z.LintonS. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988.
94.
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.BanksA. J.DavisA. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273.
95.
van der BlesA. M.PostmesT.LeKander-KanisB.OtjesS. (2018). The consequences of collective discontent: A new measure of Zeitgeist predicts voting for extreme parties. Political Psychology, 39(2), 381–398.
96.
Van der BrugW.FennemaM. (2007). Causes of voting for the radical right. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(4), 474–487.
97.
Van KleefG. A.van den BergH.HeerdinkM. W. (2015). The persuasive power of emotions: Effects of emotional expressions on attitude formation and change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1124–1142.
98.
VasilopoulosP.MarcusG. E.ValentinoN. A.FoucaultM. (2019). Fear, anger, and voting for the far right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris terror attacks. Political Psychology, 40(4), 679–704.
99.
WardG.De NeveJ.-E.UngarL. H.EichstaedtJ. C. (2020). (Un) happiness and voting in US presidential elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 370–383.
100.
WeberC. (2013). Emotions, campaigns, and political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 414–428.
101.
WelschH.BiermanP.KühlingJ. (2021). Immigration attitudes and subjective well-being: A matter of identity?Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(4), 1563–1581.
102.
WeylandK. (1999). Neoliberal populism in Latin America and eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379–401.
103.
ZhangS.WangE.ChenY. (2011). Relative deprivation based on occupation: An effective predictor of Chinese life satisfaction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2), 148–158.
104.
ZmerliS.NewtonK.MonteroJ. R. (2007). Trust in people, confidence in political institutions, and satisfaction with democracy. Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, 17, 35–65.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
