Contested Sinicization in the Tianxia All-Under-Heaven: Civilization Envy in Vietnam’s “Principal Graduates of the Two Kingdoms” Literary Trope,the 15th Century to the Present
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2024
Contested Sinicization in the Tianxia All-Under-Heaven: Civilization Envy in Vietnam’s “Principal Graduates of the Two Kingdoms” Literary Trope,the 15th Century to the Present
A rising China has upended the academia in many fronts. One of the challenges has been the reinvented ideal of Tianxia All-Under-Heaven, which first appeared in the eighth century BCE and has been offered by China as the alternative to the Westphalia system of nation-states on the basis that it will bring peace and harmony to the war-ridden international world. Nevertheless, ongoing international controversies regarding the “forced Sinicization” of the Uyghurs, the Tibetans, and the Mongols under its rule has given rise to the questions of the nature of both Tianxia and Sinicization. Analyzing a famous Vietnamese literary trope of the “principal graduates of the two kingdoms” that emerged no later than the 15th century, this essay proposes a concept of civilization envy to discuss the nuances of Sinicization. Civilization envy is a competitive mentality that desires to prove one’s civilizational parity with or even superiority over China, the center of Tianxia. This mentality of civilization envy continues to modern era, and the “principal graduates of the two kingdoms” have been promoted to national heroes to show that Vietnam is a “Domain of Literature.” The evolution of the trope shows that China and Vietnam had different understanding of civilizing missions. For China, it involved transforming mores and customs of the peoples under its direct control. For Vietnam, when dealing with China, it involved acquiring literary competence, especially the skills in mastering Sinitic script and poetry composition.
Anonymous Author. (1914). Tống Trân tân truyện 宋珍新傳 [The New Story of Tống Trân]. Institute of Sino-Nom Studies, AB.217.
4.
Anonymous Author. (1942). Xã chí (H. Phù Cừ) [Village Records, Phù Cừ District]. Ecole française d’Extrème-Orient Bibliothèque, A.J.13/2.
5.
Anonymous Author. (1992). Liễu Hạnh sự tích kí [Records of the Deeds of Liễu Hạnh], in Thinh văn dị lục [Strange Things Heard and Seen]. In ChenQ.H.ZhengA. C.TrầnN. (Eds.), Yuenan hanwen xiaoshuo cungkan [Collected works of Sino-Vietnamese literature] (Vol. 2, pp. 266–273). École française d’Extrême-Orient.
6.
BùiV. V. (2000). Kho tàng truyện Nôm khuyết danh Việt Nam [Collections of Anonymous Truyện Nôm] (Vol. 1). Văn học.
7.
CallahanW. A. (2008). Chinese visions of world order: Post-hegemonic or a new hegemony?International Studies Review, 10, 749–761.
8.
CaoX. D. ([1883] 2006). Đại Nam nhất thổng chí [Unified Gazetteer of Đại Nam] (Vol. 3). Thuận Hóa.
9.
CheibubJ. A.VreelandJ. R. (2018). Modernization theory: Does economic development cause democratization? In LancasterC.WalleN. V. D. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the politics of development (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press.
10.
ChoiB. W. (2004). Southern Vietnam under the reign of Minh Mang (1820–1841): Central policies and local response. Southeast Asia Program Publications.
11.
CookeN. (1994). Nineteenth-century vietnamese confucianization in historical perspective: Evidence from the palace examinations (1463–1883). Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(2), 270–312.
12.
DurandM. ([1985] 1998). L’Univers des Truyện Nôm. EFEO.
13.
FukuyamaF. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the french revolution (Vol. 1). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
14.
GengH. L. (2016). A preliminary study on vietnam’s envoys to china and the Sino-Vietnamese relationship: The case of the Đinh and Lê Dynasties [yuenan beishi yu zhongyue guanxi chukao: yi ding li chao weili]. Zhishang, 20, 3–24.
15.
HansenV. (1990). Changing Gods in medieval China, 1127–1276. Princeton University Press.
16.
HolcombeC. (2013). Immigrants and strangers: From cosmopolitanism to confucian universalism in Tang China. T’ang Studies, 2002, 71–112.
17.
HsuY. L. (2018). Cong dongya shiye luan ‘xingli daquan’ de yiyi: yi hanguo yu yuenan de liuchuan bijiao wei zhongxin [Understanding Xingli Daquan in East Asian context: Comparing its circulation in Korea and Vietnam]. Zhongzheng Journal of Sinology, 32, 35–64.
18.
HuangL. (2014). Cong wenxue xushi dao wenhua jiyi: Zhongyue kuajing zuchun Song Jen gushi de huwenxing chanshi (From narratives to cultural memory: The intertexual connections of the Tống Trân stories among ethnic minories in Sino-Vietnamese borders). Minzu wenxue yanjiu (Studies of Ethnic Literature), 6, 93–101.
19.
KelleyL.Beyond the bronze pillars: Envoy poetry and the Sino-Vietnamese relationship. University of Hawaii Press.
20.
LêQ. Đ. (1777). Kiến văn tiểu lục [Jottings of things seen and heard]. Institute of Sino-Nom Studies, A.32.
21.
LêT. H. (2021). Các dạng thức tồn tại của truyện Tống Trân Cúc Hoa (The diverse forms of the Tống Trân Cúc Hoa story). Tạp chí khoa học xã hội (Journal of Social Science), 10, 43–52.
22.
LewisM. E.HsiehM. Y. (2017). Tianxia and the invention of empire in East Asia. In WangB. (Ed.), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics (pp. 25–48). Duke University Press.
23.
LiuY. J. (2007). Yuenan hannan guji de wenxianxue yanjiu [A bibliological study of Sino-Vietnamese texts]. Zhonghua.
24.
MahoneyJ.Rodríguez-FrancoD. (2018). Dependency theory. In LancasterC.WalleN. V. D. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the politics of development (pp. 22–42). Oxford University Press.
25.
NathanA. (2003). China’s changing of the guard: Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 6–17.
26.
NgôS. L. ([1679] 1983). Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư [Completed annals of the Great Việt] (Vol. 1). University of Tokyo Toyo Culture Research Center.
27.
NgôT. P. (2013). Nghiên cứu truyện thơ cùng cốt truyện: Trạng Nguyên người Thaí với Tống Trân Cúc Hoa người Kinh (Comparing the Thái people’s Trạng Nguyên with the Kinh people’s Tống Trân). Journal of Science of HNUE, Social Science, 58, 32–40.
28.
NguyễnB. T., ([ca. the early 19th century] 2011). The history of the founding of Vietnam (Việt Nam khai quốc chí truyện). In SunX.TrịnhK. M.ChenY. Y. (Eds.), Yuenan hanwen guji (Collection of Sino-Vietnamese fictions). Guji.
29.
NguyễnT. K. (1931). The Anecdotal history of Trạng Cầu (Dã sử Trạng Cầu). Nam Phong, 28, 158–163.
30.
PelleyP. M. (2002). Postcolonial vietnam: New histories of the national past. Duke University Press.
31.
PomeranzK. (2005). Empire and ‘civilizing’ missions, past and present. Dædalus, 134(2), 34–45.
32.
RavinaM. (2017). To stand with the nations of the world. Oxford University Press.
33.
TrầnQ. N. ([ca. 17th century] 2012). Mạc Đĩnh Chi truyện [The story of Mạc Đĩnh Chi]. In ChenQ. H.SunX.ChenY. Y. (Eds.), Yuenan hanwen xiaoshuo jicheng (Collections of Sino-Vietnamese fictions) (Vol. 9). Guji.
34.
TrịnhT. P. H. (2015). Truyện thơ Nôm Tống Trân-Cúc Hoa nhìn từ góc độ văn học và văn hóa dân gian (A study of the Nôm verse story Tống Trân-Cúc Hoa from the perspectives of the folk literature and folk culture) [Master thesis, Vietnam National University].
35.
VũN. K. (2012). Kho tàng về các ông trạng Việt Nam: Truyện và giai thoại [Treasures of Vietnam’s principal graduates: Biographies and stories]. Văn hoá thông tin.
36.
VũN. K. (2019). Kể chuyện trạng Việt Nam [Stories about Vietnam’s principal graduates]. Văn học.
37.
WachutkaM. (2013). Kokugaku in Meiji-period Japan: The modern transformation of ‘National Learning’ and the formation of scholarly societies. Brill.
38.
WangB. (2017). Introduction. In WangB. (Ed), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics (pp. 8–22). Duke University Press.
39.
WhitmoreJ. (1997) Literati culture and integration in Dai Viet, c.1430–c.1840. Modern Asian Studies, 31(3), 665–687.
40.
WoodsideA. (1988). Vietnam and the Chinese model: A comparative study of nguyen and Ch’ing civil government in the first half of the nineteenth century. Harvard Asia Center.
41.
YangS. Y. (2019). The way of the barbarians: Redrawing ethnic boundaries in Tang and Song China. University of Washington Press.
42.
YeS. F. (2016). Yuenan gudai ‘neidi waichen’ zhengce yu shuangchong guohao de yanbian [The evolution of historical Vietnam’s “emperor internally, subject externally” policy and dual titles of reigning dynasties]. Studies of the History of Images, 134–166.
43.
ZhaoT. Y. (2021). All under heaven: The tianxia system for a possible world order. University of California Press.
