Building and Wedging Strategic Alliances: Racial Framing Contests in the Immigrant Rights and Nativist Counter-Movements

Abstract

As immigrant rights movements and anti-immigrant mobilizations engage in contentious battles for public support, it is increasingly essential to understand how these opposing political forces develop strategic alliances, garnering power, and shaping larger debates around immigration. Using newspaper data, this study compares case studies of immigrant rights and nativist battles in two mobilizations—the 2012 “No Papers, No Fear Ride for Justice” during the Obama Era and the 2018 “Family Separation Protests” during the Trump Era—to analyze how movements and counter-movements strategically deploy frames to generate or disrupt strategic alliances. Findings identify strategic racial frame deployment as a mechanism that can either amplify or obfuscate racial meanings, enabling, and constraining counter-frames by rival movements. I highlight patterns in how these racial frames are used in framing contests to bring groups together in alliances or wedge groups apart, illuminating the underlying system of racialization as it shapes intergroup boundaries, its limits, and its radical possibilities for transformation.

Keywords

immigration social movements racism framing culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

(1990). Conceptions of time and events in social science methods: Causal and narrative approaches. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 23(4), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.1990.10594204

Armstrong

E. A.

Bernstein

(2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements*. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x

Aslani

King

B. G.

Foroughi

(2013). Framing, resonance, and micro-mobilization: Shall we say what we are for, or what we are against? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 17170. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.163

Bell

D. A.

(1995). Who’s afraid of critical race theory. University of Illinois Law Review, 893.

Benford

R. D.

Snow

D. A.

(2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611

Bernstein

(2013). Power, politics and social movements: A multi-institutional politics approach. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.760309

Bloch

K. R.

(2014). ‘Anyone can be an illegal’: Color-blind ideology and maintaining latino/citizen borders. Critical Sociology, 40(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920512466274

Bloemraad

Silva

Voss

(2016). Rights, economics, or family? Frame resonance, political ideology, and the immigrant rights movement. Social Forces, 94(4), 1647–1674. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov123

Bonilla-Silva

(2013). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

10.

Boomgaarden

H. G.

Vliegenthart

(2007). Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: The role of news media content. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.018

11.

Bracey

G. E.

(2015). Toward a critical race theory of state. Critical Sociology, 41(3), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513504600

12.

Bracey

Chambers

Lavelle

Mueller

J. C.

(2017). The white racial frame: A roundtable discussion. In Thompson-Miller

Ducey

(Eds.), Systemic racism: Making liberty, justice, and democracy real (pp. 41–75). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59410-5_3

13.

Brooks

Ebert

Flockhart

(2017). Examining the reach of color blindness: Ideological flexibility, frame alignment, and legitimacy among racially conservative and extremist organizations. The Sociological Quarterly, 58(2), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1296340

14.

Brown

H. E.

(2013). Race, legality, and the social policy consequences of anti-immigration mobilization. American Sociological Review, 78(2), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413476712

15.

Brown

Jones

J. A.

(2015). Rethinking panethnicity and the race-immigration divide: An ethnoracialization model of group formation. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214558304

16.

Carastathis

(2013). Identity categories as potential coalitions. Signs, 38(4), 941–965. https://doi.org/10.1086/669573

17.

Carter

J. S.

Lippard

Baird

A. F.

(2019). Veiled threats: Color-blind frames and group threat in affirmative action discourse. Social Problems, 66(4), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spy020

18.

Collins

P. H.

Bilge

(2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.

19.

Corbin

Strauss

(2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

20.

Crenshaw

(1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New Press. Distributed by W.W. Norton & Co.

21.

Delgado

Stefancic

(2017). Critical race theory: an introduction. (3rd ed.). NYU Press.

22.

Ebert

Liao

Estrada

E. P.

(2020). Apathy and color-blindness in privatized immigration control. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(4), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649219846140

23.

Ebert

Okamoto

(2015). Legitimating contexts, immigrant power, and exclusionary actions. Social Problems, 61(2), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spu006

24.

Enriquez

L. E

. (2014). “Undocumented and citizen students unite”: Building a cross-status coalition through Shared ideology. Social Problems, 61(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2014.12032

25.

Feagin

J. R.

(2010). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing. Routledge.

26.

Gilliam

F. D.

Iyengar

(2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669264

27.

Goffman

(1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.

28.

Griffin

L. J.

(1992). Temporality, events, and explanation in historical sociology an introduction. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192020004001

29.

Johnston

Noakes

J. A.

(2005). Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.

30.

Jones

J. A.

(2019). The browning of the new South. University of Chicago Press.

31.

Kaplan

(2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0340

32.

Lawrence

R. G.

(2006). Seeing the whole board: New institutional analysis of news content. Political Communication, 23(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600629851

33.

Luna

(2016). “Truly a women of color organization”: Negotiating sameness and difference in pursuit of intersectionality. Gender & Society, 30(5), 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216649929

34.

McCammon

H. J.

(2012). Explaining frame variation: More moderate and radical demands for women’s citizenship in the U.S. Women’s Jury movements. Social Problems, 59(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2012.59.1.43

35.

Meyer

D. S.

Staggenborg

(1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628-1660. https://doi.org/10.1086/230869.

36.

Meyer

D. S.

Whittier

Robnett

(2002). Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state. Oxford University Press.

37.

Mora

G. C.

(2014). Making Hispanics: How activists, bureaucrats, and media constructed a new American. University of Chicago Press.

38.

Mueller

J. C.

(2017). Producing colorblindness: Everyday mechanisms of white ignorance. Social Problems, 64(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw061

39.

Mueller

J. C.

(2020). Racial ideology or racial ignorance? An alternative theory of racial cognition. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 142–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926197

40.

Naber

N. C.

(2002). So our history doesn’t become your future: The local and global politics of coalition building post september 11th. Journal of Asian American Studies, 5(3), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2003.0019

41.

Okamoto

D. G.

(2006). Institutional panethnicity: Boundary Formation in Asian-American organizing. Social Forces, 85(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0136

42.

Okamoto

Ebert

(2016). Group boundaries, immigrant inclusion, and the politics of immigrant–native relations. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(2), 224–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215607580

43.

Omi

Winant

(2014). Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.

44.

Portes

Zhou

(1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293530001006

45.

Ray

(2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335

46.

Skrentny

J. D.

(2004). The minority rights revolution. Belknap Press.

47.

Snow

D. A.

Benford

R. D.

(1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In Frontiers in social movement theory. Yale University Press. https://books-google-com.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/books/about/Frontiers_in_Social_Movement_Theory.html?id=2kxcGwv2_u4C

48.

Terriquez

Brenes

Lopez

(2018). Intersectionality as a multipurpose collective action frame: The case of the undocumented youth movement. Ethnicities, 18(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817752558

49.

Treitler

V. B.

(2013). The ethnic project: Transforming racial fiction into ethnic factions. Stanford University Press.

50.

Valdez

Golash-Boza

(2017). Towards an intersectionality of race and ethnicity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(13), 2256–2261. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1344277

51.

Wingfield

A. H.

(2017). Legal outsiders, strategic toughness: Racial frames and counter-frame in the legal profession. In Thompson-Miller

Ducey

(Eds.), Systemic racism: Making liberty, justice, and democracy real (pp. 185–202). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59410-5_8

52.

Yazdiha

(2014). Law as movement strategy: How the Islamophobia movement institutionalizes fear through legislation. Social Movement Studies, 13(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.807730

53.

Yazdiha

(2017). The legacies of the civil rights movement and the paradoxical politics of inclusion: Collective memory in contentious politics. UNC Chapel Hill.

54.

Yazdiha

(2020). All the muslims fit to print: Racial frames as mechanisms of muslim ethnoracial formation in the New York Times from 1992 to 2010. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(4), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220903747

55.

Zamora

Osuji

(2014). Mobilizing African Americans for immigrant rights: Framing strategies in two multi-racial coalitions. Latino Studies, 12(3), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2014.47

56.

Zepeda-Millán

(2017). Latino mass mobilization: Immigration, racialization, and activism. Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB