Being Asian American Women Scientists and Engineers in the United States: Intersection of Ethnicity and Gender

Abstract

A high level of educational and occupational achievements in science and engineering (S&E) in the US has changed the image of Asian Americans from the “yellow peril” to a “model minority.” Behind this new identity is the belief that Asian Americans as a group have equaled, if not surpassed, the standards of success set by White America in S&E. It is further assumed that Asian American women are advancing equally in S&E. The reality is that they are over-represented as Asian Americans but under-represented as women in S&E occupations. They experience challenges associated with both, their ethnicity and gender. They face “double bind”—a term used for women of color who simultaneously experience sexism and racism in S&E. This paper presents Asian American women’s unique situations within S&E organizations, with a particular focus on high-technology industry, where most of them are employed. It focuses on their identities and socio-cultural categorizations.

Keywords

Asian women double bind bamboo ceiling model minority women of color

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Associated Press . (2021, August 12). More than 9,000 Anti-Asian incidents have been reported since the pandemic began. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2021/08/12/1027236499/anti-asian-hate-crimes-assaults-pandemic-incidents-aapi

Barthlemy

R. S.

McCormick

Henderson

(2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1-14), Article 020119.

Bhattacharya

(2018, May 2). A US tech company promised its H-1B workers $8,000 a month but paid them $800. Quartz India. https://qz.com/1268241/h-1b-visa-abuse-a-california-company-promised-its-foreign-workers-8000-and-paid-them-800/

Blair-Loy

Cech

E. A.

(2017). Demands and devotion: Cultural meanings of work and overload among women researchers and professionals in science and technology industries. Social Forces, 32(1), 5–27. doi: 10.1111/socf.12315.

Braxton

J. M.

Baird

L. L.

(2001). Preparation for professional self-regulation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 593–610. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0016-8.

Britton

D. M.

(2016). Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society, 31(1), 5-27. doi: 10.1177/0891243216681494.

Carlone

H. B.

Johnson

(2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. doi: 10.1002/tea.20237.

Cech

E. A.

Blair-Loy

(2014). Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work Occupation, 41(1), 86–110. doi: 10.1177/0730888413515497.

Chipman

S. F.

Brush

L. R.

Wilson

D.M.

(Eds.) (2014). Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation. New York: Psychology Press.

10.

Chowdhury

F. D.

(2009). Theorising patriarchy: The Bangladesh context. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37(4), 599–622. doi: 10.1163/156853109x460200.

11.

Chua

(2011). Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. New York: Penguin.

12.

Economic Times Bureau . (2013, February 28).TCS to pay $30 million to settle employee class action suit in US. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/tcs-to-pay-30-million-to-settle-employee-class-action-suit-in-us/articleshow/18701530.cms

13.

Eligon

Blinder

Najar

(2017, February 24). Hate crime is feared as 2 Indians are shot in Kansas. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/24/world/asia/kansas-attack-possible-hate-crime-srinivas-kuchibhotla.html

14.

Fox

M. F.

(2010). Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(7), 997–1012. doi: 10.1177/0002764209356234.

15.

Friedman

T.L.

(2007, May 2). Laughing and crying. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/23/opinion/23friedman.html

16.

Gjelten

(2015). A nation of Nations: A great American immigration story. New York: Simon & Schuster.

17.

Hadhazy

(2021, 18 November). Stanford community members participate in event decrying the racial profiling of scientists of Chinese descent. Stanford News. https://news.stanford.edu/2021/11/18/stanford-community-members-decry-racial-profiling-chinese-scientists/

18.

Hekman

D. R.

Johnson

S. K.

Foo

M.-D.

Yang

(2017). Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders? Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 771–797. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0538.

19.

Hill

C. A.

Corbett

St Rose

(2010). Why so few: Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women.

20.

Hofstede

G. H.

(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.

21.

Hogarth

M. A.

(2006, November 16).Siebel to pay $27.5 million in OT lawsuit. San Francisco Business Times. https://www.bizjournals.com/eastbay/stories/2006/11/13/daily43

22.

Hyun

(2009). Breaking the bamboo ceiling. HarperCollins.

23.

Kay

Shipman

(2018). The confidence code: The science and art of self-assurance--what women should know. HarperCollins Publishers.

24.

Kim

C. J.

(1999). The racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Politics and Society, 27(1), 105–138. doi: 10.1177/0032329299027001005.

25.

LAAUNCH (2021). Staatus Index Report 2021. http://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5f629e7e013d961943d5cec9/6098a7be3d627168e03054da_staatus-index-2021.pdf.

26.

Lerman

(2018, August 29). Redmond CEO charged with fraud on more than 100 H-1B visa applications. The Seattle Times. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/redmond-ceo-charged-with-fraud-on-more-than-100-h-1b-visa-applications/

27.

Leslie

S. J.

Cimpian

Meyer

Freeland

(2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262-265. doi: 10.1126/science.1261375.

28.

Malcom

S. M.

Hall

P. Q.

Brown

J. W.

(1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. American Association for the Advancement of Science.

29.

Merton

R. K.

(1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

30.

Mukhopadhyay

C. C.

Seymour

(Eds.), (1994). Women, education and family structure in India. Westview Press.

31.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021). Transforming trajectories for women of color in tech. National Academies Press.

32.

National Science Board (2018). Science and engineering indicators. National Science Foundation.

33.

National Science Board (2020). Science and engineering indicators. National Science Foundation.

34.

National Science Foundation (2021). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. National Science Foundation.

35.

Ngo

Lee

S. J.

(2007). Complicating the image of model minority success: A review of Southeast Asian American education. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 415–453. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309918.

36.

Nunes

(2021, June 28). Lessons from the bamboo ceiling. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/bamboo-ceiling

37.

Ong

Wright

Espinosa

Orfield

(2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209. doi: 10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2.

38.

Ontiveros

M. L.

(2017). H-1B Visas, outsourcing and body shops: A continuum of exploitation for high tech workers. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 38, 1–47.

39.

Patel

(2008). Racialized sexism in the lives of Asian American women. In Raghavan

Edwards

A. E.

Vaz

K. M.

(Eds.), Benefiting by Design: Women of Color in Feminist Psychological Research (pp. 116-128). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

40.

Pew Research Center . (2021, April 29). Key facts about Asian Americans, a diverse and growing population. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/29/key-facts-about-asian-americans/

41.

Pfaelzer

(2007). Driven out: The forgotten war against Chinese Americans. Random House.

42.

Pollack

(2015). Why are there still few women in science? New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.html.

43.

Poon

Squire

Kodama

Byrd

Chan

Manzano

, et al. (2015). A critical review of the model minority myth in selected literature on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1–34.

44.

Prashad

(2000). The karma of Brown folk. University of Minnesota Press.

45.

Ranjarajan

(2018). Here’s the clearest picture of Silicon Valley’s diversity yet. https://revealnews.org/article/heres-the-clearest-picture-of-silicon-valleys-diversity-yet/.

46.

Rohaidi

(2016). Why are Asians so good at maths and science? AsianScientist. https://www.asianscientist.com/2016/05/academia/asian-students-good-maths-science/.

47.

Sabharwal

(2017). Asians as model minorities: A myth or reality among scientists and engineers in academia. In Muenstermann

(Ed.), People’s Movements in the 21st Century – Risks, Challenges and Benefits (pp. 187–206). InTech. doi: 10.5772/66827.

48.

Sabharwal

Varma

(2017a). Convergence or divergence: Science practice among immigrant faculty in India and the United States. Science, Technology & Human Values, 42(5), 775–794. doi: 10.1177/0162243916689711.

49.

Sabharwal

Varma

(2017b). Are Asian Indian scientists and engineers in academia faced with a glass ceiling. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 12, 50–62.

50.

Simon

H. A.

(1997 1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Free Press.

51.

Tang

(2000). Doing engineering: The career attainment and mobility of Caucasian Black, and Asian-American engineers. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

52.

Uchida

(1998). The orientalization of Asian women in America. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(2), 161-174. doi: 10.1016/s0277-5395(98)00004-1.

53.

US Department of Justice . (2013, October 30). Indian corporation pays record amount to settle allegations of systemic visa fraud and abuse of immigration processes. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edtx/pr/indian-corporation-pays-record-amount-settle-allegations-systemic-visa-fraud-and-abuse

54.

US Department of Labor (2011). Administrator, wage and hour division v. The Lambents group. Administrative Review Board.

55.

Varma

(2007). Harbingers of global change: India’s techno-immigrants in the United States. Lexington Books.

56.

Varma

(2011). Transnational migration and entrepreneurialism: Indians in the U.S. technology sector. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 10(2), 270–287. doi: 10.1163/156914911x582422.

57.

Varma

(2020). To be or not to be on H-1B: Engineers from India in the United States. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 19(2), 281–302. doi: 10.1163/15691497-12341557.

58.

Varma

(2021). Dissecting culture at work: Conversation with Indian immigrant scientists & engineers in the US technology sector. Technology in Society, 66, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101654.

59.

Westfall

(2021, September 14). Battling discrimination and the bamboo ceiling: The bias facing Asian American managers. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2021/09/14/discrimination-and-bamboo-ceiling-the-unconscious-bias-facing-asian-american-managers/?sh=48b572ee23dc

60.

Williams

J. C.

Multhaup

Korn

(2018, January 18). The problem with ‘Asians are good at science.’ Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/01/asian-americans-science-math-bias/551903/

61.

Woo

(2000). Glass ceilings and Asian Americans. Alta Mira Press.

62.

Jing

(2011). Asian women in STEM careers: An invisible minority in a double bind. Issues in Science and Technology, 28, 82–87.