Discovering why the 2020 election turned out as it did will, given the complexities of American politics, take considerable time. Discovering how Trump lost and how Biden won will take longer. This article presents an initial foray in the latter direction by subjecting the rhetoric of the campaign to computerized language analysis via the DICTION program. In doing so, this study is the most recent outgrowth of the Campaign Mapping Project, begun at the University of Texas in Austin in 1995 and designed to produce comparative rhetorical data about presidential campaigns from 1948 to the present. The argument being made here is that Donald Trump lost the election by making excessive use of what Richard Hofstadter calls the Paranoid Style. In addition, Trump made exaggerated claims about abstract and unprovable conspiracies, all of which seemed derivative to voters worried about their health and their jobs in 2020. Joe Biden, in contrast, stressed Commonality—the need for shared purpose during a dangerous and dispiriting time. Biden also spoke directly of and to the people, thereby taking a page out of Trump’s own 2016 playbook. In many ways, Donald Trump’s self-preoccupations made him blind to the needs of the electorate, a habit that developed over the course of his presidency and that ultimately cost him his job.
CarnegieA.CarsonA. (2019). Reckless rhetoric? Compliance pessimism and international order in the age of Trump. Journal of Politics, 81(2), 739-746. https://doi.org/10.1086/702232
CrehanK. (2018). The common sense of Donald J. Trump: A Gramscian reading of twenty-first century populist rhetoric. In Jaramillo TorresA.SableM. B. (Eds.), Trump and political philosophy: Leadership, statesmanship, and tyranny (pp. 275-291). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74445-2_16
13.
CruzL. (2016). Trumplethinkskin: Narcissism and the will to power. In CruzL.BuserS. (Eds.), A clear and present danger: Narcissism in the era of President Trump (pp. 69–86). Chiron.
EdwardsJ. A. (2018). Make America great again: Donald Trump and redefining the U.S. role in the world. Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 176-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1438485
HartR. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton University Press.
22.
HartR. P. (2020a). Donald Trump and the return of the paranoid style. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12637
JamiesonK. H.TaussigD. (2017). Disruption, demonization, deliverance, and norm destruction: The rhetorical signature of Donald J. Trump. Political Science Quarterly, 132(4), 618-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12699
MeibauerG. (2020). Ambiguous specificity: The production of foreign policy bullshit in electoral contexts. Politics, 41(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720936039
35.
MilesM. R.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2020). Trump, twitter, and public dissuasion: A natural experiment in presidential rhetoric. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12615
OliverJ. E.WoodT. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
41.
OttB. (2016). The age of twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
42.
OttB. L.DickinsonG. (2019). The Twitter presidency: Donald J. Trump and the politics of white rage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429054259
RossA. S.CaldwellD. (2020). “Going negative”: An APPRAISAL analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on twitter. Language & Communication, 70(January), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003
49.
SavoyJ. (2018). Trump’s and Clinton’s style and rhetoric during the 2016 presidential election. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 25(2), 168-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1349358
StuckeyM. E. (2020). “The power of the presidency to hurt”: The indecorous rhetoric of Donald J. Trump and the rhetorical norms of democracy. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 366-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12641
52.
TheyeK.MellingS. (2018). Total losers and bad hombres: The political incorrectness and perceived authenticity of Donald J. Trump. Southern Communication Journal, 83(5), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1511747.
