Following the July 22, 2011, Oslo bombing and shootings at the Utøya youth camp Norway became embroiled in a conflict over commemorative ethics. The memorial initially selected in an international contest, Memory Wound by Jonas Dahlgren, drew opposition from victims’ families and local residents for its severe impact on the natural landscape. Plans for installation were cancelled in 2017. This controversy, we submit, must be contextualized in relation to the Norwegian justice system’s handling of Anders Breivik, the perpetrator whose criminal proceedings were kept relatively secluded. We demonstrate how the design of Memory Wound and the suppression of Breivik’s publicity reflect a symbolic logic traceable to a national imaginary of Norwegian exceptionalism. By interpretively aligning the use of negative space in Memory Wound with the muting of Breivik as a media event, we investigate the prescriptive force of symbols to inculcate world views. Specifically, we attend to the foreclosure of “prosthetic memory,” which through media circulation allows people to engage with memory that is not primarily theirs. We acknowledge the possibility of empathy across difference that Landsberg ascribes to prosthetic memory; however, we insist that the circumstances under which solidarity might be rejected must be considered. With a dual case study, we offer a perspective on enduring assumptions about cultural identity and the rise of rightwing extremism in Northern Europe.
AlexanderJ. C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In AlexanderJ. C.EyermanR.GiesenB. (Ed.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 1-30). University of California Press.
AnderssonM. (2012). The debate about multicultural Norway before and after 22 July 2011. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 19(4), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2012.684442
5.
BachmannV.BialasiewiczL.SidawayJ. (2012). Bloodlands: Critical geographical responses to the 22 July 2011 events in Norway. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1068/d303
BieseckerB. (2002). Remembering World War II: The rhetoric and politics of national commemoration at the turn of the 21st century. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88(4), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384386
8.
BlairC.JeppesonM.PucciE. (1991). Public memorializing in postmodernity: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial as prototype. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77(3), 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639109383960
9.
BlairC.MichelN. (2007). The AIDS memorial quilt and the contemporary culture of public commemoration. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 10(4), 595-626. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2008.0024
10.
BodnarJ. E. (1992). Remaking America: Public memory, commemoration, and patriotism in the twentieth century. Princeton University Press.
DonofrioT. (2010). Ground zero and place-making authority: The conservative metaphors in 9/11 families’ “take back the memorial” rhetoric. Western Journal of Communication, 74(2), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570311003614492
20.
DossE. L. (2010). Memorial mania: Public feeling in America. University of Chicago Press.
21.
EdkinsJ. (2003). Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge University Press.
22.
EyermanR. (2001). Cultural trauma: Slavery and the formation of African American identity. Cambridge University Press.
FimreiteA.LangoP.LægreidP.RykkaL. (2013). After Oslo and Utøya: A shift in the balance between security and liberty in Norway?Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(10), 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2013.823754
25.
FrankD. (2007). A traumatic reading of twentieth-century rhetorical theory: The Belgian holocaust, Malines, Perelman, and de Man. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 93(3), 308-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630701426793
HagelundA. (2005). The progress party and the problem of culture: Immigration politics and right wing populism in Norway. In RydgrenJ. (Ed.), Movements of exclusion: Radical right-wing populism in the western world (pp. 147-164). Nova Science.
31.
HarteliusE. J. (2010). Leave a message of hope or tribute: Digital memorializing as public deliberation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47(2), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2010.11821739
32.
HaskinsE. (2003). Put your stamp on history: The USPS commemorative program celebrate the century and postmodern collective memory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630308170
33.
HaskinsE. (2007). Between archive and participation: Public memory in a digital age. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(4), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601086794
34.
HemmingsbyC.BjørgoT. (2016). The dynamics of a terrorist targeting process: Anders B. Breivik and the 22 July Attacks in Norway. Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
HesfordW. S. (2011). Spectacular rhetorics: Human rights visions, recognitions, feminisms. Duke University Press.
36.
HessA. (2007). In digital remembrance: Vernacular memory and the rhetorical construction of web memorials. Media, Culture & Society, 29(5), 812-830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707080539
LandsbergA. (2004). Prosthetic memory. Columbia University Press.
41.
LillegravenH. (2017). Making visible: Memory Wound and the site of memory in the 21st century [Doctoral dissertation]. Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London.
42.
LipsitzG. (2001). Time passages. University of Minnesota Press.
43.
LödénH. (2014). Peace, love, depoliticisation and the domestic alien: National identity in the memorial messages collected after the terror attacks in Norway 22 July 2011. National Identities, 16(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2014.918593
44.
MillerN. K.TougawJ. D. (2002). Extremities: Trauma, testimony, and community. University of Illinois Press.
NoraP. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26(April), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
48.
OwenA. S. (2002). Memory, war and American identity: Saving Private Ryan as cinematic jeremiad. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(3), 249-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216565
49.
OwenA. S.EhrenhausP. (2010). Communities of memory, entanglements, and claims of the past on the present: Reading race trauma through the green mile. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903551017
50.
PierceL. (2014). A rhetoric of traumatic nationalism in the ground zero mosque controversy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2014.888461
51.
PopperK. (2011). The open society and its enemies. Routledge Classics. (Original work published 1945)
SodaroA. (2018). Exhibiting atrocity: Memorial museums and the politics of past violence. Rutgers University Press.
57.
SodaroA. (2019). Prosthetic trauma and politics in the National September 11 Memorial Museum. Memory Studies, 12(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017720257
SturkenM. (1997). Tangled memories. University of California Press.
62.
VivianB. (2006). Neoliberal epideictic: Rhetorical form and commemorative politics on September 11, 2002. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630600687107
63.
von BrömssenK. (2013). 2083—A European declaration of independence: An analysis of discourses from the extreme. Nordidactica, 2013(1), 12-33.
64.
WaggonerK. (2015). What can government talk tell us about punitiveness? The case of Norway post 22 July 2011. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814542985
65.
WeiserE. (2017). Museum rhetoric: Building civic identity in national spaces. Penn State University Press.
66.
WiggenM. (2012). Rethinking anti-immigration rhetoric after the Oslo and Utøya terror attacks. New Political Science, 34(4), 585-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2012.729744
67.
WoodsC.EwaltJ.BakerS. (2013). A matter of regionalism: Remembering Brandon Teena and Willa Cather at the Nebraska History Museum. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 99(3), 341-363.
68.
YoungJ. E. (1993). The texture of memory: Holocaust memorials and meaning. Yale University Press.
69.
YoungJ. E. (2016). The stages of memory: Reflections on memorial art, loss, and the spaces between. University of Massachusetts Press.
70.
ZelizerB. (2002). Finding aids to the past: Bearing personal witness to traumatic public events. Media, Culture & Society, 24(5), 697-714. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400509
71.
ZelizerB. (2007). On “having been there”: “Eyewitnessing” as a journalistic key word. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(5), 408-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701694614
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
