This study explored voters’ perceptions of Donald Trump regarding their general trust in his presidential leadership. In 2019, a little over 2 years into Trump’s first term, Shockley-Zalabak and Morreale administered an online census-representative survey to 1,500 registered voters in all 50 states, examining their trust perceptions of Trump. The purpose of the survey was to explore voters’ perceptions of President Donald Trump in three regards: (a) in what ways, if at all, did voters’ perceptions change in 2019 by comparison to a similar survey conducted by these researchers in 2016; (b) in what ways might any changes in voters’ perceptions be a function of voter demographics; and (c) in what ways might any changes in voters’ perceptions be related to five critical drivers that underlie trust? The findings of this study support other polls and the more popular press conclusions that Donald Trump is a divisive individual who has retained a generally low-trust evaluation throughout his political career. The demographic divides evidenced in 2016 remained in 2019 and shifted to more polarized and more extreme positions. In other words, those who in 2016 had evaluated Trump most favorably increased their favorability ratings, while those distrusting Trump increased in that distrust. Finally, because of the unpreceded crises of the global pandemic, economic crisis, and racial tensions of 2020, this study’s findings are used to postulate about the implications of presidential trust or the lack therefore during the first half of 2020.
KrosgaardM. A.BrodtS. E.WhitenerE. M. (2002). Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.312
LeeK. (2009). How the Hong Kong government lost the public trust in SARS: Insights for government communication in a health crisis. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 74-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.06.003
15.
MannJ. (2015). George W. Bush: The American presidents’ series: The 43rd President, 2001-2009. Henry Holt and Company.
16.
MaruyamaG.RyanD. S. (2014). Research methods in social relations (8th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
MorrealeS. P.Shockley-ZalabakP. S. (2014). A qualitative study of organizational trust: Leaders’ perceptions in organizations in Poland and Russia. Intercultural Communication Studies, 22(3), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217730855
20.
MorrealeS. P.Shockley-ZalabakP. S. (2015). Organizational trust in cultures with a history of distrust: Polish and Russian leaders’ perspectives and experiences. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 44(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2014.989255
RhodesB. (2018). The world as it is: A memoir of the Obama White House. Penguin Random House.
28.
SeegerM. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: An expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600769944
29.
Shockley-ZalabakP. S.EllisK.CesariaR. (2000). Measuring organizational trust: A diagnostic survey and international indicator. International Association of Business Communicators.
30.
Shockley-ZalabakP. S.MorrealeS. P. (2011). Building high-trust organizations. Leader to Leader, 2011(60), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.467
31.
Shockley-ZalabakP. S.MorrealeS. P.HackmanM. (2010). Building the high-trust organization: Strategies for supporting five key dimensions of trust. Wiley.
32.
Shockley-ZalabakP. S.MorrealeS. P.StavrosituC. (2017, 2019). Voters’ perceptions of trust in 2016 presidential candidates, Clinton and Trump: Exploring the election’s outcome. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(7), 856-887. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217730855
33.
SiegristM.ZinggA. (2014). The role of public trust during pandemics: Implications for crisis communication. European Psychologist, 19(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000169
