This article identifies the dominant frame through which university administrators in the United States respond to racist incidents and analyzes that from using the lens of critical race theory (CRT). We argue that the stock response of college and university administrators, which calls for counterspeech as the only appropriate response to racist speech, fails to consider the harmful effects of racist speech on students, staff, and faculty of color. Furthermore, this abstract-liberalist, color-blind approach decontextualizes racist speech from the historical and contemporary reality of structural racism that informs the speech acts and symbols used in these displays. We further use the CRT approach by shifting the perspective from a unilateral focus on protecting the right to racist speech to explore what happens when analysts focus instead on protecting substantively equal access for community members of color. In so doing, we highlight the value of CRT for revealing how white racial framing obscures competing legal and policy norms.
BellJ.HartmannD. (2007) Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of ‘happy talk’. American Sociological Review, 72(6): 895-914.
4.
BlanksJ. (2002, April18). Administration responds to BLSA demands as students stage protest. Harvard Law Record. Retrieved from http://hlrecord.org/?p=12225
5.
BoboL.KluegelJ.R.SmithR. (1996). Laissez-Faire racism: The crystallization of a ‘kinder, gentler’ anti-black ideology. Russell Sage Foundation: June.
6.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2010). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BourdieuP. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14-25.
8.
CarrL. G. (1997). Color-blind racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CrenshawK. W. (1988). Foreword: Toward a race-conscious pedagogy in legal education. National Black Law Journal, 11(1), 1-14.
10.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2004). Understanding words that wound. New York, NY: Westview Press.
11.
DiTamasoN.Parks-YancyR.PostC. (2003). White views of civil rights: Color blindness and equal opportunity. In: DoaneA. W.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White Out: The Continuing Significance of Racism. NewYork, NY: Routledge, 189-198.
12.
DrayP. (2002). At the hands of person’s unknown: The lynching of black America. New York, NY: Modern Library.
13.
FeaginJ. R. (2006). Systemic racism: A theory of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
FeaginJ. R.VeraH.ImaniN. (1997). The agony of education: Black students at white colleges and universities. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York :Pantheon Books.
16.
GallagherC. A. (2003). Color-blind privilege: The social and political functions of erasing the color line in post race America. Race, Gender, & Class, 10(4), 22-37.
JonesC. (1992). Regulating campus hate speech: Is it constitutional?NCCD Focus, San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
19.
KouryR.KohB. (1995, February16). Students at the college of San Mateo and UC-Berkeley rally against racism hate fliers evoke sadness at Colleges. San Jose Mercury News, p. 1B.
LewisA. E. (2003). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC. R.III. (1993). Epilogue: Burning crosses and the R. A. V. case. In MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC. R.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. W. (Eds.), Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment (pp. 133-136). New York, NY: Westview Press.
23.
MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC. R.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. W. (Eds.). (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment. New York, NY: Westview Press.
24.
MooreW.L. (2008). Reproducing racism: White space, elite law schools, and racial inequality. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
MooreW.L.BellJ.M. (2017). “The right to be racist in college: Racist speech, white institutional space and the first amendment,” Law and Policy, 39(2):99-120
26.
MuellerJ.2017. “Producing coloblindness: Everyday mechanisms of white ignorance.” Social Problems, 64:219-238.
27.
Musu-GilletteL.ZhangA.WangK.ZhangJ.KempJ.DilibertiM.OudekerkB.A. (2018). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2017 (NCES 2018-036/NCJ 251413). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC.
