Mediated public diplomacy literature examines the engagement of foreign audiences by governments via mediated channels. To date, scholars have examined the competitive contest between global rivals in promoting and contesting one another’s frames as reflected in global news media coverage. Recognizing the meaningful impact of social media platforms, along with the global rise of government-sponsored media organizations, the current study builds on previous mediated public diplomacy scholarship by expanding the scope of the literature beyond the earned media perspective to also include paid, shared, and owned media. The article presents a revised definition of the term mediated public diplomacy along with a case study of government to foreign stakeholder engagement via the social media platform, Twitter.
ArifR.GolanG. J.MoritzB. (2014). Mediated public diplomacy: US and Taliban relations with Pakistani media. Media, War & Conflict, 7, 201-217.
2.
AuerbachY.Bloch-ElkonY. (2005). Media framing and foreign policy: The Elite Press vis-à-vis US policy in Bosnia, 1992–95. Journal of Peace Research, 42, 83-99.
3.
AyalonA.PopovichE.YarchiM. (2014). From warfare to imagefare: How states should manage asymmetric conflicts with extensive media coverage. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28, 254-273.
4.
Bloch-ElkonY. (2007). Studying the media, public opinion, and foreign policy in international crises: The United States and the Bosnian crisis, 1992-1995. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(4), 20-51.
5.
BorahP. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246-263.
6.
CarrageeK.RoefsW. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54, 214-233.
7.
CassidyJ.ManorI. (2016). Crafting strategic MFA communication policies during times of political crisis: A note to MFA policy makers. Global Affairs, 2, 331-343.
8.
ChangT. K.LinF. (2014). From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China’s international practice and its image, 1950–2009. Public Relations Review, 40, 450-458.
9.
ChengZ.GolanG. J.KiousisS. (2016). The second-level agenda-building function of the Xinhua news agency: Examining the role of government-sponsored news in mediated public diplomacy. Journalism Practice, 10, 744-762.
10.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99-118.
11.
CullN. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 31-54.
12.
CullN. J. (2010). Public diplomacy: Seven lessons for its future from its past. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6, 11-17.
13.
de VresseC. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal, 13(1), 51-62.
14.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification on a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
15.
EntmanR. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415-432.
16.
EntmanR. E. (2004). Projecting power in the news. In Projections of power framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy (pp. 2-28). London, England: University of Chicago Press.
17.
EntmanR. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 87-102.
18.
FahmyS.WantaW.NisbetE. C. (2012). Mediated public diplomacy: Satellite TV news in the Arab world and perception effects. International Communication Gazette, 74, 728-749.
19.
FullertonJ.KendrickA. (2017). Shaping international public opinion: A model for nation branding and public diplomacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
20.
FullertonJ. A.KendrickA.KerrG. (2009). Australian student reactions to US tourism advertising: A test of advertising as public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5, 141-150.
21.
GilboaE. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 55-77.
22.
GilboaE. (2016). Public diplomacy. In MazzoleniG. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 1-9). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
23.
GolanG. J. (2015). An integrated approach to public diplomacy. In GolanG. J.YangS. U.KinseyD. F. (Eds.), International public relations and public diplomacy: Communication and engagement (pp. 37-50). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
24.
GolanG. J.HimelboimI. (2016). Can world system theory predict news flow on twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 1150-1170.
25.
GolanG. J.ViatchaninovaE. (2014). The advertorial as a tool of mediated public diplomacy: Russia’s outreach in India and the United States. International Journal of Communication, 8, 126-128.
26.
GregoryB. (2016). Mapping boundaries in diplomacy’s public dimension. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 11, 1-25.
27.
GrunigJ. E. (1993). Public relations and international affairs: Effects, ethics and responsibility. Journal of International Affairs, 47, 137-162.
28.
HaydenC. (2012a). The rhetoric of soft power: Public diplomacy in global contexts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
29.
HaydenC. (2012b). Social media at state: Power, practice, and conceptual limits for US public diplomacy. Global Media Journal, 11(21), 1-21.
30.
HoskinsA.O’LoughlinB. (2010). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Glasgow, Scotland: Polity.
31.
KampfR.ManorI.SegevE. (2015). Digital diplomacy 2.0? A cross-national comparison of public engagement in Facebook and Twitter. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10, 331-362.
32.
ManheimJ. B. (1994). Strategic public diplomacy & American foreign policy: The evolution of influence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
ManorI.CrilleyR. (2018). Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel ministry of foreign affairs on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict, 11, 369-391.
34.
ManorI.PammentJ. (in press). Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
35.
ManorI.SegevE. (2015). America’s selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts. In BjolaC.HolmesM. (Eds.), Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice (pp. 89-108). London, England: Routledge.
36.
MelissenJ. (Ed.). (2005). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
MiskimmonA.O’LoughlinB. (2017). Russia’s narratives of global order: Great power legacies in a polycentric world. Politics and Governance, 5, 111-120.
38.
MiskimmonA.O’LoughlinB.RoselleL. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
NatarajanK. (2014). Digital public diplomacy and a strategic narrative for India. Strategic Analysis, 38, 91-106.
40.
NisbetE. C.NisbetM. C.ScheufeleD. A.ShanahanJ. E. (2004). Public diplomacy, television news, and Muslim opinion. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 11-37.
41.
NyeJ. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153-171.
42.
NyeJ. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
43.
NyeJ. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94-109.
QuelchJ. A.JoczK. E. (2009). Can brand Obama rescue brand America?Brown Journal of World Affairs, 16, 163-178.
46.
RawnsleyG. D. (2015). To know us is to love us: Public diplomacy and international broadcasting in contemporary Russia and China. Politics, 35, 273-286.
47.
Samuel-AzranT.PechtN. (2014). Is there an Al-Jazeera–Qatari nexus? A study of Al-Jazeera’s online reporting throughout the Qatari–Saudi conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 7, 218-232.
48.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.
49.
SeibP. (2009). Toward a new public diplomacy: Redirecting US foreign policy. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
50.
SeibP. (2012). Real-time diplomacy: Politics and power in the social media era. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
SheaferT.GabayI. (2009). Mediated public diplomacy: A strategic contest over international agenda building and frame building. Political Communication, 26, 447-467.
52.
SheaferT.ShenhavS. R. (2009). Mediated public diplomacy in a new era of warfare. Communication Review, 12, 272-283.
53.
SheaferT.ShenhavS. R.AmsalemE. (2018). International frame building in mediated public diplomacy. In D’AngeloP. (Ed.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
SheaferT.ShenhavS. R.TakensJ.van AtteveldtW. (2014). Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication, 31, 149-167.
55.
SignitzerB. H.CoombsT. (1992). Public relations and public diplomacy: Conceptual convergence. Public Relations Review, 18, 137-147.
56.
StoycheffE.NisbetE. C. (2016). Priming the costs of conflict? Russian public opinion about the 2014 Crimean conflict. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 657-675.
57.
TamL.KimJ. N. (2019). Who are publics in public diplomacy? Proposing a taxonomy of foreign publics as an intersection between symbolic environment and behavioral experiences. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15, 28-37.
58.
WantaW.GolanG. J.LeeC. (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 364-377. doi:10.1177/107769900408100209
59.
YunS. H. (2006). Toward public relations theory-based study of public diplomacy: Testing the applicability of the excellence study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18, 287-312.
60.
ZaharnaR. S. (2007). The soft power differential: Network communication and mass communication in public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2, 213-228.
61.
ZaharnaR. S. (2010). Battles to bridges: US strategic communication and public diplomacy after 9/11. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
