Despite compelling literature, research has so far failed to provide substantive empirical evidence on the relationship between individual preferences on the inclusion of immigrants into institutionalized forms of solidarity and migration incorporation regimes. I argue that, apart from individual factors and welfare state generosity, citizenship models shape citizen’s attitudes on immigrant social rights. Concretely, I examine the effect of the civic and cultural dimensions of the models of citizenship relative to attitudes of unconditional institutional solidarity toward immigrants and welfare chauvinism. The results show that individual attitudes about welfare eligibility of migrants differ among sociodemographic characteristics, political economic orientations, and social depositions of deservingness but at the same time yield from the cultural barriers to the access of immigrants to the political community.
AlesinaA.GlaeserE. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
ArielyG. (2012). Do those who identify with their nation always dislike immigrants? An examination of citizenship policy effects. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 18, 242-261. doi:10.1080/13537113.2012.680862
3.
BantingK.KymlickaW. (2017). The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeramendiP.HäusermannS.KitscheltH.KriesiH. (Eds.). (2015). The politics of advanced capitalism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BrubakerR. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CinalliM.GiugniM. (2016). Electoral participation of Muslims in Europe: Assessing the impact of institutional and discursive opportunities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 309-324.
7.
CrepazM. (2008). Trust beyond borders: Immigration, the Welfare State, and identity in modern societies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
CrepazM.DamronR. (2009). Constructing tolerance: How the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 437-463.
9.
EggertN. (2014). The impact of political opportunities on interorganizational networks: A comparison of migrants’ organizational fields. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19, 369-386.
10.
EmmeneggerP.CarejaR. (2012). From dilemma to dualization: Social and migration policies in the “reluctant countries of immigration.” In EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (Eds.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 124-150). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (2012). The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
HainmuellerJ.HiscoxM. J. (2010). Attitudes towards highly skilled and low skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 61-84.
13.
HelblingM.KriesiH. (2014). Why citizens prefer high- over low-skilled immigrants: Labor market competition, welfare state and deservingness. European Sociological Review, 30, 595-614.
14.
HuddlestonT.BilgiliO.JokiA.VankovaZ. (2015). Migrant Integration Policy Index 2015. Retrieved from www.mipex.eu
15.
KitscheltH.McGannA. J. (1997). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
16.
KoopmansR. (2013). Multiculturalism and immigration: A contested field in cross-national comparison. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 147-169.
17.
KoopmansR.StathamP.GiugniM.PassyF. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
KriesiH. (2004). Political context and opportunity. In SnowD.SouleS.KriesiH. (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 67-90). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
19.
KymlickaW. (2015). Solidarity in diverse societies: Beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism. Comparative Migration Studies, 3, 17. doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4
20.
MagginiN.FernándezG. G. E. (2019). Politicisation of solidarity toward out-groups: The case of refugees. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
MarshallT. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MorissensA.SainsburyD. (2005). Migrants’ social rights, ethnicity and welfare regimes. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 637-660.
23.
ReeskensT.Van OorschotW. (2012). Disentangling the “New Liberal Dilemma”: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53, 120-139.
24.
SchlueterE.MeulemanB.DavidovE. (2012). Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: A multilevel study of 27 Western and Eastern European countries. Social Science Research, 42, 670-682.
25.
StathamP.TillieJ. (2016). Muslims in their European societies of settlement: A Comparative agenda for empirical research on socio-cultural integration across countries and groups. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 177-196.
26.
StjernøS. (2005). Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Van der WaalJ.De KosterW.Van OorschotW. (2013). Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 15, 164-181.
28.
Van OorschotW. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28(1), 33-48.
29.
Van OorschotW. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23-42.
30.
Van OorschotW.UunkW. (2007). Welfare spending and the public’s concern for immigrants: Multilevel evidence for eighteen European countries. Comparative Politics, 4(1), 63-82.
31.
Van OorschotW.RoosmaF.MeulemanB.ReeskensT. (2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
32.
WaldrauchH.HofingerC. (1997). An index to measure the legal obstacles to the integration of migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 23, 271-285.
33.
WangJ.CaminadaK. (2017). Leiden LIS Budget Incidence Fiscal Redistribution Dataset on income inequality (Version 1). Retrieved from www.economie.leidenuniv.nl
34.
WeldonS. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 331-349.
35.
WrightM. (2011). Policy regimes and normative conceptions of nationalism in mass public opinion. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 598-624.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
