Current societies have undergone a many-faceted but also general turn toward self-responsibility. This is hardly contested, as shown by societal analyses of different kinds. Up to now though, the literature on self-responsibility has either focused on specific areas of society or hardly discussed the concept in sociological depth. In this special issue, we aim to do both. From a broad sociological and societal perspective the special issue analyses differences and communalities in the turn toward self-responsibility and highlights the challenges and perspectives it presents. The aim is a new discussion of the concept of self-responsibility that draws on actors’ embeddedness in institutional environments and emphasizes the consequences of the development for individuals and societies.
AtkinsonD.SuderG. (Eds.). (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the global economy. European Journal of International Management, 4(3).
2.
BarrN. (2001). The welfare state as piggy bank: Information, risk, uncertainty, and the role of the state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BetzeltS.BothfeldS. (Eds.). (2011). Activation and labour market reforms in Europe: Challenges to social citizenship. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BexellM.JönssonK. (2016). Responsibility and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44, 13-29.
5.
BrammerS.JacksonG.MattenD. (Eds.). (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3-28.
6.
ClarkeJ. (2006). Consumers, clients or citizens? Politics, policy and practice in the reform of social care. European Societies, 8, 423-442.
7.
CrouchC. (2015). Governing social risk in post-crisis Europe. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
8.
DurkheimE. (2013). The division of labor in society (2nd ed., LukesS. Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 1933)
9.
ErvikR.KildalN.NilssenE. (Eds.). (2015). New contractualism in European welfare state policies. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
11.
FranckT. (2000). The empowered self: Law and society in the age of individualism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
FraserN. (2013). A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after Polanyi. New Left Review, 81, 191-132.
13.
FuchsV. R. (Ed.). (1996). Individual and social responsibility: Child care, education, medical care, and long-term care in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
GabeJ.HarleyK.CalnanM. (2015). Healthcare choice: Discourses, perceptions, experiences and practices. Current Sociology, 63, 623-635.
15.
GilbertN. (2002). Transformation of the welfare state: The silent surrender of public responsibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
GreveB. (Ed.) (2011). Choice: Challenges and perspectives for the European welfare state. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
HarrisR. (Ed.). (2010). Configuring health consumers: Health work and the imperative of personal responsibility. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
KelzR. (2016). The non-sovereign self, responsibility, and otherness: Hannah Arendt, Judith Butler, and Stanley Cavell on moral philosophy and political agency. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
KramerD. (2016). Earning social citizenship in the European Union: Free movement and access to social assistance benefits reconstructed. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 18, 270-301.
20.
MejiaP.DorfmanL.CheyneA.NixonL.FriedmanL.GottliebM.DaynardR. (2014). The origins of personal responsibility rhetoric in news coverage of the tobacco industry. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 1048-1051.
21.
NewmanJ.TonkensE. (Eds.). (2011). Participation, responsibility and choice: Summoning the active citizen in Western European welfare states. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
22.
NullmeierF. (2006). Personal responsibility and its contradiction in terms. German Policy Studies, 3, 386-399.
23.
PlayerS.PollockA. M. (2001). Long-term care: From public responsibility to private good. Critical Social Policy, 21, 231-255.
24.
PyysiäinenJ.HalpinD.GuilfoyleA. (2017). Neoliberal governance and “responsibilization” of agents: Reassessing the mechanisms of responsibility-shift in neoliberal discursive environments. Journal of Social Theory, 18, 215-235.
25.
RostgaardT.ZechnerM. (Eds.). (2012). Shifting boundaries of elder care: Changing roles and responsibilities. European Journal of Ageing, 9(2), 97-99.
26.
TheofilouA.GrigoreG.StancuA. (Eds.). (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the post-financial crisis era: CSR conceptualisations and international practices in times of uncertainty. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
WeberM. (2004). Politik als Beruf [Politics As a Vocation]. Stuttgart, Germany: Reclam. (Original work published 1919)
28.
WilliamsH. H. (2017). “Personal responsibility” and the end of welfare as we know it. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50, 379-383.
