Case study has a tradition of collecting multiple forms of data—qualitative and quantitative—to gain a more complete understanding of the case. Case study integrates well with mixed methods, which seeks a more complete understanding through the integration of qualitative and quantitative research. We identify and characterize “mixed methods–case study designs” as mixed methods studies with a nested case study and “case study–mixed methods designs” as case studies with nested mixed methods. Based on a review of published research integrating mixed methods and case study designs, we describe key methodological features and discuss four exemplar interdisciplinary studies.
American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33-40. doi:10.3102/0013189x035006033
2.
BulloughR. V.Jr. (2015). Differences? Similarities? Male teacher, female teacher: An instrumental case study of teaching in a Head Start classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 13-21. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.001
3.
CooperR. B. (2000). Information technology development creativity: A case study of attempted radical change. MIS Quarterly, 24, 245-276.
4.
CoyleC. E.Schulman-GreenD.FederS.ToramanS.PrustM. L.Plano ClarkV. L.CurryL. (2016). Federal funding for mixed methods research in the health sciences in the United States: Recent trends. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689816662578
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2015a). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2015b). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57-71). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134-2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117
11.
GerringJ. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for?American Political Science Review, 98, 341-354.
12.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13, 554-561. doi:10.1370/afm.1865
13.
GuettermanT. C.MitchellN. (2016). The role of leadership and culture in creating meaningful assessment: A mixed methods case study. Innovative Higher Education, 41, 43-57.
14.
HarlandT. (2014). Learning about case study methodology to research higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 1113-1122. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.911253
15.
HyettN.KennyA.Dickson-SwiftV. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9, 23606. doi:10.3402/qhw.v9.23606
16.
IvankovaN. V.StickS. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48, 93-135. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
17.
KelleyA.SnellB.BinghamD. (2015). Peer recovery support in American Indian Communities: A qualitative intrinsic case-study approach. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 10, 271-286. doi:10.1080/1556035X.2015.1066727
18.
KezarA. (2013). Institutionalizing student outcomes assessment: The need for better research to inform practice. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 189-206. doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9237-9
19.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265-275.
20.
LieberE.WeisnerT. S. (2010). Meeting the practical challenges of mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 559-579). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
LittleS. H.MotoharaS.MiyazakiK.AratoN.FettersM. D. (2013). Prenatal group visit program for a population with limited English proficiency. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 26, 728-737.
22.
McKimC. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11, 202-222. doi:10.1177/1558689815607096
23.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2016). Mixed methods research prevalence studies: Field-specific studies on the state of the art of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10, 123-128. doi:10.1177/1558689816636707
25.
MorseJ. M. (2011). Molding qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1019-1021. doi:10.1177/1049732311404706
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2010). Generalization practices in qualitative research: A mixed methods case study. Quality & Quantity, 44, 881-892. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z
27.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
ScammonD. L.Tomoaia-CotiselA.DayR. L.DayJ.KimJ.WaitzmanN. J.. . . MagillM. K. (2013). Connecting the dots and merging meaning: Using mixed methods to study primary care delivery transformation. Health Services Research, 48, 2181-2207. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12114
29.
SharpJ. L.MobleyC.HammondC.WithingtonC.DrewS.StringfieldS.StipanovicN. (2012). A mixed methods sampling methodology for a multisite case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 34-54. doi:10.1177/1558689811417133
30.
ShawE. K.Ohman-StricklandP. A.PiaseckiA.HudsonS. V.FerranteJ. M.McDanielR. R.Jr.. . . CrabtreeB. F. (2013). Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: A cluster randomized trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 11, 220-228, S1-S8. doi:10.1370/afm.1505
31.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Van TuyckomC.BrackeP. (2014). Survey quality and cross-national sports research: A case study of the 2007 ISSP survey. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, S228-S234. doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.683814
34.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
