Alternative collective initiatives often emerge during hard times, supporting citizens and helping them meet their increasing needs through nonmainstream economic activities. To this end, citizens organize formal and informal alternative action organizations (AAOs). Recent studies have shown that the economic crisis was a trigger for the founding of a wide variety of new AAOs, especially in the countries most affected, such as Greece and Spain. One aspect of AAOs untouched so far, however, is their life span. This article investigates factors that impact on AAOs’ ability to stay active online, using fresh data on their organizational profiles from their organizational websites. It offers a comparative, systematic analysis of the age structure and the activity rate of AAOs in nine European countries (Greece, Germany, Italy, France, Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Switzerland, and Sweden), for the 2007-2016 period. Following the classic resource mobilization theory, we conclude that the lifeline of these organizations, as that of social movement organizations, even when their forms are innovative and alternative, depends on adequate resources.
AndrettaM.GuidiR. (2017). Political consumerism and producerism in times of crisis. A social movement perspective?Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 246-274.
2.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
3.
BlancoI.LeσnM. (2013, September). Who’s the containment dike? The Spanish Mortgage Victims Platform (Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca—PAH) as a driver of social innovation. Paper presented at the Conference of Interrogating Urban Crisis: Governance, Contestation and Critique, De Montfort University, Leicester, England. Retrieved from http://www.dmu.ac.uk/documents/business-and-law-documents/research/lgru/ismaelblancoandmargaleon.pdf
4.
BosiL.ZamponiL. (2015). Direct social actions and economic crises: The relationship between forms of action and socio-economic context in Italy. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8, 367-391.
5.
CastellsM.CaraçaJ.CardosoG. (Eds.). (2012). Aftermath: The cultures of the economic crisis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
CressD. M.SnowD. A. (1996). Mobilization at the margins: Resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations. American Sociological Review, 61, 1089-1109.
7.
CruzH.Rubén MartínezM.BlancoI. (2017). Crisis, urban segregation and social innovation in Catalonia. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 221-245.
8.
Della PortaD. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity: Bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9.
Della PortaD.DianiM. (2009). Social movements: An introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
10.
Della PortaD.MoscaL. (2005). Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 165-190.
11.
EarlJ. (2015). The future of social movement organizations: The waning dominance of SMOs online. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 35-52.
12.
EdwardsB.McCarthyJ. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116-152). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
13.
EltantawyN.WiestJ. B. (2011). The Arab spring: Social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207-1224.
14.
FeatherstoneK.KazamiasG. (2000). Introduction: Southern Europe and the process of “Europeanization.”. South European Society and Politics, 5(2), 1-24.
15.
FerreraM. (1996). The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 17-37.
16.
FornoF.GrazianoP. R. (2014). Sustainable community movement organisations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14, 139-157.
17.
FreemanJ.CarrollG. R.HannanM. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692-710.
18.
GiugniM.GrassoM. (2018). Citizens and the crisis: Experiences, perceptions, and responses to the Great Recession in Europe. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.
19.
GrangerR. C.WringeJ.AndrewsP. (2010). LETS as alternative, post-capitalist economic spaces? learning lessons from the Totnes “Acorn”. Local Economy, 25(7), 573-585.
20.
JenkinsJ. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527-553.
21.
JohnstonH.NoakesJ. A. (Eds.). (2005). Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
KousisM. (2017). Alternative forms of resilience confronting hard economic times: A south European perspective. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 119-135.
23.
KousisM.KalogerakiS.PapadakiM.LoukakisA.VelonakiM. (2016). Alternative Formen von Resilienz in Griechenland [Alternative Forms of Resilience in Greece]. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 29, 50-61.
24.
KousisM.GiugniM.LahusenC. (2018). Action Organization Analysis: Extending Protest Event Analysis Using Hubs-Retrieved Websites. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(6), 739-757.
25.
KousisM.PaschouM. (2017). Alternative forms of resilience: A typology of approaches for the study of citizen collective responses in hard economic times. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 136-168.
26.
LahusenC. (1996). The rhetoric of moral protest: Public campaigns, celebrity endorsement, and political mobilization. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
27.
LahusenC.KousisM.ZschacheU.LoukakisA. (2018). European solidarity in times of crisis: Comparing transnational activism of civic organizations in Germany and Greece. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie.
28.
LeontidouL. (2010). Urban social movements in “weak” civil societies: The right to the city and cosmopolitan activism in Southern Europe. Urban Studies, 47, 1179-1203.
LoukakisA. (2016, April). Political consumerism in Greece at times of economic crisis: Environmental awareness or a way to deal with the effects of the crisis?Paper presented at the 2016 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Pisa, Italy.
33.
LoukakisA.KousisM.LahusenC.KiessJ. (2016, April). Alternative action organizations in the Eurozone crisis: Comparing the Greek and German experience, 2007-2016. Paper presented at the 23rd Conference of European Studies “Resilient Europe?Philadelphia, PA.
34.
McCarthyJ. D.WolfsonM. (1996). Resource mobilization by local social movement organizations: Agency, strategy, and organization in the movement against drinking and driving. American Sociological Review, 61, 1070-1088.
35.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
36.
NezH. (2014, September). Practices of social solidarity and economic alternatives in times of crisis: The network of social rights of Carabanchel, Madrid. Paper presented at ECPR (European Consortium for Political Research) General Conference, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
37.
NormanL.UbaK.TempleL. (2015). Austerity measures across Europe. In FosterL.BruntonA.DeemingC.HauxT. (Eds.), In defence of welfare 2 (pp. 55-58). London, England: Social Policy Association.
38.
PapadakiM.KalogerakiS. (2017). Social support actions as forms of building community resilience at the onset of the crisis in urban Greece: The case of Chania. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 193-220.
39.
PrattB.PopplewellR. (2013). The emergence and re-emergence of civil society: A brief history of civil society in Europe, from the Magna Carta to the Eurozone crisis. Development in Practice, 23, 721-728.
40.
RuppL. J.TaylorV. A. (1987). Survival in the doldrums the American women’s rights movement, 1945 to the 1960s. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
ScottW. R. (1981). Developments in organization theory, 1960-1980. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 407-422.
43.
ShahinJ.WoodwardA.TerzisG. (2013). The impact of the crisis on civil society organizations in the EU: Risks and opportunities. Brussels, Belgium: European Economic and Social Committee, European Union.
44.
ShirkyC. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90, 28-41.
45.
SimitiM. (2017). Civil society and the economy: Greek civil society during the economic crisis. Journal of Civil Society,13, 357-373.
46.
SoonC.ChoH. (2014). OMGs! Offline-based movement organizations, online-based movement organizations and network mobilization: A case study of political bloggers in Singapore. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 537-559.
47.
SotiropoulouI. (2016). Solidarity, grassroots initiatives and power relations. World, 6, 44-59.
48.
Wickham-CrowleyT. P. (1989). Understanding failed revolution in El Salvador: A comparative analysis of regime types and social structures. Politics & Society, 17, 511-530.
49.
ZaldM. N.AshR. (1966). Social movement organizations: Growth, decay and change. Social Forces, 44, 327-341.
50.
ZaldM. N.McCarthyJ. D. (2002). The resource mobilization research program: Progress, challenge, and transformation. In BergerJ.Zelditch Jr.M. (Eds.), New directions in contemporary sociological theory (pp. 147-171). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
