Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The comprehensive and systematic study of collective action organizations (AOs) requires a new methodological approach that takes into account the rise of online sources as well as the new ways in which people interact and participate in politics. This article aims to present and situate in the related literature such an approach, which was recently created and applied in two European Commission funded research projects, LIVEWHAT and TransSOL, across nine and eight countries respectively. Moving beyond recent studies using online sources, our research used a hubs website based approach to study alternative action organizations (AAOs) in the LIVEWHAT project and transnational solidarity AOs in the TransSOL project. The hubs and subhubs websites that aggregate data on AOs in multiple regions were scraped to identify national samples that offer advanced coverage of the repertoire of AO activities, as defined by the teams. These nodal websites were used as sources, similar to the way in which newspapers are treated in protest event analysis. The article situates and compares the new action organization analysis approach against its foundational protest event, protest case, and political claims analyses, as well as other approaches offering data on online activism. It outlines its main features and the related data construction process, while showcasing its application in the two European Commission cross-national projects. Finally, its merits and limitations are discussed, including a reference to how it can be used as a foundation for a mixed-methods approach.

Keywords

protest event analysis action organization analysis social movement organizations alternative actions organizational analysis online digital activism hub-websites website analysis political claims analysis mixed methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andretta

Guidi

(2017). Political consumerism and producerism in times of crisis: A social movement perspective. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 246-274.

Baumgarten

(2017). Back to solidarity-based living? The economic crisis and the development of alternative projects in Portugal. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 169-192.

Beissinger

M. R.

(2002). Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet state. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bennett

W. L.

Segerberg

(2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Cruz

Martínez

Blanco

(2017). Crisis, urban segregation and social innovation in Catalonia. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 221-245.

Cohen

Kahne

Bowyer

Middaugh

Rogowski

(2012). Participatory politics: New media and youth political action. Oakland, CA: Youth and Participatory Politics Research Network.

Diani

Kousis

(2014). The duality of claims and events: The Greek campaign against the Troika’s memoranda and austerity, 2010–2012. Mobilization, 19, 387-404.

Earl

(2006). Pursuing Social Change Online: The Use of Four Protest Tactics on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review 24(3), 362-377. http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/24/3/362

Earl

(2013). Spreading the word or shaping the conversation: “Prosumption” in protest websites. In Coy

P. G.

(Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 6, pp. 3-38). Bingley, England: Emerald.

10.

Earl

Kimport

(2013). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age (Acting With Technology series). Cambridge: MIT Press.

11.

Fillieule

Jiménez

(2007). Appendix A: The methodology of protest event analysis and the media politics of reporting environmental protest events. In Rootes

(Ed.), Environmental protest in western Europe. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

12.

Forno

Graziano

P. R.

(Eds.). (2014). Consumerist Culture and Social Movements [Special issue]. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2).

13.

Giugni

(Ed.). (2010). The contentious politics of unemployment in Europe: Welfare states and political opportunities. Houndmills, England: Palgrave.

14.

Goodwin

Jasper

J. M.

(1999). Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. In Sociological forum (Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 27-54). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

15.

Hutter

(2014). Protest event analysis and its offspring. In Porta

D. della

(Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 335-367). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

16.

Koopmans

Rucht

(2002). Protest event analysis. In Klandermans

Staggenborg

(Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 231-259). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

17.

Koopmans

Statham

(1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization, 4, 40-51.

18.

Kousis

(1998, May). Protest-case analysis: A methodological approach for the study of grassroots environmental mobilizations (Working Paper Series, No. 570). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Social Organization. Retrieved from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/51334/1/570.pdf

19.

Kousis

(1999). Environmental protest cases: The city, the countryside and the grassroots in southern Europe. In Protest Event Analysis [Special issue]. Mobilization, 4(2), 223-238.

20.

Kousis

(2005). State responses as threats and opportunities in southern European environmental conflicts. In Kousis

Tilly

(Eds.), Economic and political contention in comparative perspective (pp. 202-225). Boulder, CO: Routledge.

21.

Kousis

(2017). Alternative forms of resilience confronting hard economic times: A south European perspective. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 119-135.

22.

Kousis

Kalogeraki

Papadaki

Loukakis

Velonaki

(2016). Alternative Formen von Resilienz in Griechenland [in German]. Forschungsjournal neue soziale Bewegungen, 29, 50-61.

23.

Kousis

Paschou

(2017). Alternative forms of resilience. A typology of approaches for the study of citizen collective responses in hard economic times. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 136-168.

24.

Kriesi

Koopmans

Duyvendak

J. W.

Giugni

(1995). New social movements in western Europe. A comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

25.

Lahusen

Kousis

Zschache

Loukakis

(2018). European solidarity in times of crisis: Comparing transnational activism of civic organisations in Germany and Greece. In Pernicka

Lahusen

(Eds.) Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. Special Issue: Power and Counter Power in Europe. The Transnational Structuring of Social Spaces and Social Fields. Vol. 17.

26.

LIVEWHAT D6.1. (2016). Codebook for the analysis of alternative action organizations (Deliverable 6.1). Retrieved from http://www.livewhat.unige.ch/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Deliverable-6.1.pdf

27.

Lusher

Ackland

(2011). A relational hyperlink analysis of an online social movement. Journal of Social Structure, 12(5), 1-35.

28.

Marketakis

Tzitzikas

Anifantis

Kalligiannakis

Lionakis

Yannakis

(2015). Analysis of web accessible networks, organizations and groups (FORTH Institute of Computer Science). Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/livewhat/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Analysis-of-Web-Accessible-Networks-Organizations-and-Groups.pdf

29.

Marketakis

Tzitzikas

Anifantis

Kalligiannakis

Lionakis

Yannakis

(2016). Analysis of web accessible networks, organizations and groups. UoC-Forth deliverable for WP2 of TransSOL. In Integrated report on reflective forms of transnational solidarity (Annex II, p. 377). Retrieved from http://transsol.eu/files/2016/12/Integrated-Report-on-Reflective-Forms-of-Transnational-Solidarity.pdf

30.

Papadaki

Kalogeraki

(2017). Social support actions as forms of building community resilience at the onset of the crisis in urban Greece: The case of Chania. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 193-220.

31.

Petropoulou

(2013). ‘Alternative Networks of Collectivities’ and ‘Solidarity-Cooperative Economy’ in Greek cities: exploring their theoretical origins. Journal of Regional Socio-economic Issues, 3(2), 61-86.

32.

Rohlinger

Earl

(2018). The past, present, and the future of media and social movements studies: Introduction to the special issue on media and social movements. In Earl

Rohlinger

D. A.

(Eds.), Studies in media and communications: Vol. 14. Social movements and media (pp. 1-20). Bingley, England: Emerald.

33.

Rucht

(2005). The Internet as a new opportunity for transnational protest groups. In Kousis

Tilly

(Eds.), Economic and political contention in comparative perspective (pp. 70-86). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

34.

Rucht

Koopmans

(2002). Protest event analysis. In Klandermans

Staggenborg

(Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 231-259). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

35.

Soule

Earl

(2005). A movement society evaluated: Collective protest in the United States, 1960–1986. Mobilization, 10, 345-364.

36.

Stein

(2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of U.S. movement websites. New Media & Society, 11, 749-771.

37.

Tarrow

(1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965-1975. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

38.

Tilly

(1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

39.

Tilly

(1986). The contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

40.

Tilly

(1995). Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB

Action Organization Analysis: Extending Protest Event Analysis Using Hubs-Retrieved Websites

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material