Developing Sustainable Methods for Broadening Participation by Transforming Mainstream Science and Technology Communities Through the Normalization of Inclusion

Abstract

Advances in science and technology (S&T) have fueled significant progress in modern society, creating greater demand for a skilled workforce. An important source for S&T talent is being missed due to the loss in greater numbers of people from underrepresented backgrounds such as women, ethnic and racial minorities, and people with disabilities. Progress has been realized in supporting underrepresented individuals (URIs) in S&T by creating strong support systems through same-identity or minority–majority communities such as the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing, Association of Women in Mathematics, Society of Women in Engineering, the Society of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science, and many more. And yet there is a significant gap between the potential URIs in the S&T workforce and their actual presence. The time has come to expand diversity and inclusion efforts in mainstream scientific communities where professional lives and careers are played out. However, for real change to occur, we cannot just support the underrepresented; we need to transform mainstream communities into places where everyone is not just welcome but is thriving and productive. The easy part of this equation is to apply evidence-based methods for supporting URIs in mainstream communities. The hard part is transforming communities through education, empirical experiences, and sustained efforts that result in tangible benefits to all. This article explores issues and posits potential approaches to develop sustainable methods for broadening participation by transforming mainstream S&T communities through the normalization of inclusion.

Keywords

diversity inclusion mainstream broadening participation normalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarado

Judson

(2014). Using targeted conferences to recruit women into computer science. Communicatoins of the ACM, 57, 70-77.

Board on Science Education. (2015). Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Booth

W. C.

Colomb

G. G.

Williams

J. M.

(2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bunderson

Christensen

(1995). An analysis of retention problems for female students in university computer science programs. Journal of Research on Computing Education, 1, 1-18.

Coalition for Reform of Undergraduate Education. (2014). Achieving systematic change: A source book for advancing and funding undergraduate STEM education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Cohoon

(2006). Just get over it or just get on with it: Retaining women in undergraduate computing. In Cohoon

Aspray

(Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 205-237). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Fisher

Margolis

(2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 79-83.

Frehill

L. M.

Cohoon

J. M.

(2015). Gender and computing. In In Pearson

Frehill

L. M.

McNeely

C. L.

(Eds.), Advancing women in science: An international perspective (pp. 237-272). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Frehill

L. M.

McNeely

C. L.

Pearson

Jr. (2015). An international perspective on advancing women in science. In Pearson

Frehill

L. M.

McNeely

C. L.

(Eds.), Advancing women in science: An international perspective (pp. 1-6). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

10.

Gilman

Simard

(2010). Grace Hopper celebration of women in computing 2010 evaluation and impact report. Palo Alto, CA: Anita Borg Institute for Women in Technology.

11.

Jamieson

L. H.

Lohmann

J. R.

(2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/member-resources/reports/CCSSIE/CCSSIEE_Phase1Report_June2009.pdf

12.

Leung

McNeely

C. L.

(2015). Opening doors to communities of practice: Programmatic interventions for inclusion in computing sciences (Research on equity and sustained participation in engineering, computing and technology). Charlotte, NC: IEEE Xplore.

13.

National Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Acadmies Press.

14.

National Research Council. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

15.

National Research Council. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

16.

National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

17.

National Science and Technology Council. (2013). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education 5-year strategic plan. Washinton, DC: Author.

18.

National Science Board. (n.d.). STEM education data (National Science Foundation). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/index.html

19.

Powell

(1990). Factors associated with the underrepresenation of African Americans in mathematics and science. Journal of Negro Education, 59, 292-298.

20.

President’s Council of Advisors on S&T. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

21.

Valverde

L. A.

(1984). Underachievement and underrepresentation of Hispanics in mathematics and mathematics-related careers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 123-133.