Internet access provides a number of ways to read, share, and discuss politics. However, the political benefits from technology are most likely afforded to those with greater Internet skill, political interest, and education. This study used nationally representative cross-sectional survey data collected during the 2016 U.S. general election to investigate two online news behaviors. Guided by research on digital inequalities, the opportunities–motivation–ability framework, and communication gaps, we found that Internet skill and political interest, but not education, are related to greater online news reading and sharing. We also found conditional relationships between Internet skill and online news behaviors that were moderated by political interest and education. Skill-based digital inequalities in online news behaviors are exacerbated for those with greater political interest, but the gap is reduced for those with less education. We discuss the threat and opportunity that a digital skill communication gap poses for online citizen engagement.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22, 285-303. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt025
2.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BeamM. A. (2014). Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research, 41, 1019-1041. doi:10.1177/0093650213497979
4.
BeamM. A.KosickiG. M. (2014). Personalized news portals: Filtering systems and increased news exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 59-77. doi:10.1177/1077699013514411
5.
BeamM. A.HutchensM. J.HmielowskiJ. D. (2016). Clicking vs. sharing: The relationship between online news behaviors and political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 215-220. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.013
6.
BenklerY. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
BimberB. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BoulianneS. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193-211. doi:10.1080/10584600902854363
9.
BoulianneS. (2011). Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. Political Communication, 28, 147-162. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.540305
10.
BrunsA. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York, NY: P. Lang.
11.
ConroyM.FeezellJ. T.GuerreroM. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1535-1546. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.012
12.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2004). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 41-60. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4801_3
14.
DylkoI. (2016). How technology encourages political selective exposure. Communication Theory, 25, 389-409. doi:10.1111/comt.12089
15.
DylkoI.BeamM. A.LandrevilleK. D.GeidnerN. W. (2012). Filtering 2008 presidential election news on YouTube by elites and non-elites: An examination in the democratizing potential of the Internet. New Media & Society, 14, 832-849. doi:10.1177/1461444811428899
16.
ElliottT.EarlJ. (2018). Online protest participation and the digital divide: Modeling the effect of the digital divide on online petition-signing. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444816669159
17.
EvelandW. P.MoreyA. C.HutchensM. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61, 1081-1103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
18.
EvelandW. P.Jr.ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Connecting news media with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17, 215-237. doi:10.1080/105846000414250
19.
FlaxmanS.GoelS.RaoJ. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(Suppl. 1), 298-320. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006
20.
GarrettR. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676-699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
21.
GarrettR. K.CarnahanD.LynchE. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004-2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113-134. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6
22.
GarrettR. K.StroudN. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680-701. doi:10.1111/jcom.12105
23.
GazianoC. (1997). Forecast 2000: Widening knowledge gaps. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 237-264. doi:10.1177/107769909707400202
24.
Gil de ZúñigaH.MolyneauxL.ZhengP. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612-634. doi:10.1111/jcom.12103
25.
Gil de ZúñigaH.WeeksB.Ardèvol-AbreuA. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 105-123. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185
26.
HabermasJ. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
HalpernD.GibbsJ. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1159-1168. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
28.
HargittaiE. (2002). Second-level digital divide. First Monday, 7(4). doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
29.
HargittaiE.HsiehY. P. (2012). Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 95-107. doi:10.1177/0894439310397146
30.
HargittaiE.LittE. (2013). New strategies for employment? Internet skills and online privacy practices during people’s job search. IEEE Security & Privacy, 11, 38-45. doi:10.1109/MSP.2013.64
31.
HargittaiE.ShawA. (2013). Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of Internet skills and engagement in young adults’ political participation around the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Broadcast & Electronic Media, 57, 115-134. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.787079
32.
HargittaiE.ShawA. (2015). Mind the skills gap: The role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions on Wikipedia. Information, Communication, & Society, 18, 424-442. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711
33.
HargittaiE.WalejkoG. (2008). The participation divide: Content 10.1080/08838151.2013.787079creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication, & Society, 11, 239-256. doi:10.1080/13691180801946150
34.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39.
37.
KatzJ. E.RiceR. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38.
LittE. (2013). Measuring users’ Internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society, 15, 612-630. doi:10.1177/1461444813475424
LuskinR. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331-361. doi:10.1007/BF00992793
41.
MessingS.WestwoodS. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41, 1042-1063. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
42.
MinS.-J. (2010). From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political Internet use. Journal of Information, Technology, and Politics, 7, 22-35. doi:10.1080/19331680903109402
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PriorM. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
47.
RobinsonL.CottenS. R.OnoH.Quan-HaaseA.MeschG.SchultzJ.. . . SternM. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication, & Society, 18, 569-582. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
48.
RogersE. M. (1976). Communication and development: The passing of the dominant paradigm. Communication Research, 3, 213-240. doi:10.1177/009365027600300207
49.
RogersE. M. (2001). The digital divide. Convergence, 7, 96-111. doi:10.1177/135485650100700406
50.
ShirkyC. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90, 28-41.
51.
StrömbäckJ.Djerf-PierreM.ShehataA. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 414-434. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds018
52.
SunsteinC. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
TichenorP. K.DonohueG. A.OlienC. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170. doi:10.1086/267786
54.
ViswanathK.FinneganJ. R.Jr. (1996). The knowledge gap hypothesis: Twenty-five years later. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19, 187-228. doi:10.1080/23808985.1996.11678931
55.
WeiL. (2012). Number matters: The multimodality of Internet use as an indicator of the digital inequalities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 303-318. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01578.x
56.
WojcieszakM. E.MutzD. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?Journal of Communication, 59, 40-56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
57.
YamamotoM.KushinM. J.DalisayF. (2015). Social media and mobiles as political mobilization forces for young adults: Examining the moderating role of online political expression in political participation. New Media & Society, 17, 880-898. doi:10.1177/1461444813518390
58.
YamamotoM.KushinM. J.DalisayF. (2017). Social media and political disengagement among young adults: A moderated mediation model of cynicism, efficacy, and social media use on apathy. Mass Communication & Society, 20, 149-168. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1224352
59.
YuL. (2006). Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38, 229-252. doi:10.1177/0961000606070600
60.
ZaretD. (2000). Origins of democratic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
