This study questions the role of media in the formation of society’s memory regarding the asylum seeker struggle in Israel. Through analyzing 180 news articles published during the daily coverage of the refugees’ protest in Israel between December 2013 and January 2014, this study offers an opportunity to explore the mediated environment that also shapes the refugees’ situation in Israel and the role of the printed press in a memory contestation. The study demonstrates that while traditional media are a site in which different versions of the past, even including the refugees’ own version, are being contested and evaluated, they are not enough to guarantee that refugees will gain recognition as such, because traditional media maintain the power to shape and construct the debate in ways that do not always support the refugees’ claims.
AssmannJ.CzaplickaJ. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125-133.
2.
BensonR.WoodT. (2015). Who says what or nothing at all? Speakers, frames, and frameless quotes in unauthorized immigration news in the United States, Norway, and France. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 802-821.
3.
ConfinoA. (1997). Collective memory and cultural history: Problems of method. American Historical Review, 102, 1386-1403.
4.
DimitrovaV. D.StrömbäckJ. (2005). Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the Elite Newspapers in Sweden and the United States. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 67, 339-417.
5.
DorD. (2004). Intifada hits the headlines: How the Israeli Press misreported the outbreak of the second Palestinian uprising. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6.
EntmanM. R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
7.
EntmanM. R. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
GavisonR. (1999). Can Israel be both Jewish and democratic? Tensions and prospects. Jerusalem: Van Leer and Hakibutz Hameuchad (In Hebrew).
10.
GitlinT. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
GlynnI.KleistO. (2012). The memory and migration nexus: An overview. In GlynnI.KleistO. (Eds.), History, memory and migration: Perceptions of the past and the politics of incorporation (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
12.
HolmesM. S.CastañedaH. (2016). Representing the “European Refugee Crisis” in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 1-13.
13.
IhlenØ.ThorbjørnsrudK. (2014). Making news and influencing decisions: Three threshold cases concerning forced return of immigrants. European Journal of Communication, 29, 139-152.
14.
KansteinerW. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Theory, 41, 179-197.
Kligler-VilenchikN. (2011). Memory-setting: Applying agenda-setting theory to the study of collective memory. In NeigerM.MeyersO.ZandbergE. (Eds), On media memory (pp. 226-237). New-York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
Kligler-VilenchikN.TsfatiY.MeyersO. (2014). Setting the collective memory agenda: Examining mainstream media influence on individuals’ perceptions of the past. Memory Studies, 7, 484-499.
18.
LechlerS.BosL.VliegenthartR. (2015). The mediating role of emotions: News framing effects on opinion about immigration. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92, 812-838.
MatthesJ. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 349-367.
21.
MeyersO. (2002). Still photographs, dynamic memories: A study of the visual presentation of Israel’s past in commemorative newspaper supplements. Communication Review, 5, 179-205.
22.
MeyersO. (2007). Memory in journalism and the memory of journalism: Israeli journalists and the constructed legacy of Haolam Hazeh. Journal of Communication, 57, 719-738.
23.
MeyersO.ZandbergE.NeigerM. (2014). Communicating awe: Media memory and holocaust commemoration. New-York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
NeigerM.MeyersO.ZandbergE. (2011). On media memory: Collective memory in a new media age. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
OlickJ. K.RobbinsJ. (1998). Social memory studies: From collective memory to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105-140.
26.
PanZ.KosickiM. G. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
27.
RamM.YacobiH. (2012). African asylum seekers and the changing politics of memory in Israel. In GlynnI.KleistO. (Eds.), History, memory and migration: Perceptions of the past and the politics of incorporation (pp. 154-170). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
ReadingA. (2011). Memory and digital media: Six dynamics of the globital memory field. In NeigerM.MeyersO.ZandbergE. (Eds), On media memory: Collective memory in a new media age. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
RicoeurP. (1999). Memory and forgetting. In KearneyR.DooleyM. (Eds.), Questioning ethics: Contemporary debates in philosophy (pp. 5-12). London, England: Routledge.
30.
SchejterA.TiroshN. (2016). A justice-based approach for new media policy: In the paths of righteousness. London, England: Palgrave McMillan.
31.
SchejterA.YeminiM. (2015). “A time to scatter stones and a time to gather them”: Media and telecommunications ownership trends in Israel 1984-2013. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 112-126.
32.
SchudsonM. (1992). Watergate in American memory: How we remember, forget, and reconstruct the past. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
SchudsonM. (2014). Journalism as a vehicle of non-commemorative cultural memory. In ZelizerB.Tenenboim-WeinblattK. (Eds.), Journalism and memory (pp. 85-96). Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
TiroshN. (2016). Reconsidering the “right to be forgotten”: Memory rights and the right to memory in the new media era. Media, Culture & Society, 39, 644-660.
35.
TiroshN.Klein-AvrahamI. (2017). “Memorless”: The visual framing of refugees in Israel. Journalism Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1383857
36.
TiroshN.SchejterA. (2015). “I will perpetuate your memory through all generations”: Institutionalization of collective memory by law in Israel. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 11(1), 21-35.
37.
TiroshN.SchejterA. (2017). “Information is like your daily bread”: The role of media and telecommunications in the life of refugees in Israel. Hagira—Israel Journal of Migration, 7, 1-25.
38.
VertahaimD. (2014). TGI Survey 2014: A widening gap between Yedioth Ahronoth and Israel Hayom. Retrieved from http://b.walla.co.il/item/2769911
39.
Vinitzky-SeroussiV. (2002). Commemorating a difficult past: Yizhak Rabin’s memorials. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 30-51.
40.
YaronH.Hashimshony-YaffeN.CampbellJ. (2013). “Infiltrators” or refugees? An Analysis of Israel’s policy towards African asylum seekers. International Migration, 51, 144-157.
41.
ZandbergE. (2010). The right to tell the (right) story: Journalism, authority and memory. Media Culture & Society, 32, 5-24.
42.
ZelizerB. (1992). Covering the body: The Kennedy assassination, the media, and the shaping of collective memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
