Abstract
Singh, P. (2017). The theoretical potential of the within-nation comparison: How sub-national analyses can enrich our understandings of the national welfare state. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(8), 861–886. DOI: 10.1177/0002764217731122
• On page 863, Figure 1 was missing from the article.
• On page 869, the last line of the last full paragraph is incomplete. It is currently mentioned as,
“Similarly, Gibson (argument about hiding from central government).”
It should read:
“Similarly, Gibson’s argument about how local autocrats are able to escape national scrutiny by limiting the scope of political conflict in their jurisdictions would not travel to explain pockets of national authoritarianism.”
• On page 874, the last line of Note 13 is incomplete. It currently says,
“…include Tudor and Ziegfeld (2016), who . . .;”
It should read:
“…include Tudor and Ziegfeld (2016), who show that the one-party dominance of the Congress was challenged earliest where opposition parties could draw on resources from political competition in the pre-independence period;”
The electronic version of the article has been corrected.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
