The author presents an understanding of how human capital and human rights have influenced educational policies and the persistence of inequitable opportunities for students. As an alternative approach, human capabilities, an emerging concept of basic liberties, provides an alternative theory for building human capital that can inform academic and social advocacy for reducing gaps in fairness in opportunities to attain a higher education. The author introduces four frames for decoding assumptions used in political rationales for higher education policies, programs, and funding. These frames are used to examine how six states adapted to shifts in federal policy on educational standards and high loans. When policy assumptions are decoded, a human capabilities lens can help find remedies to inequalities in state system markets.
ArchibaldR. B.FeldmanD. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 618-644.
2.
BeckerG. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special consideration of education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
BennettW. J. (1987, February18). Our greedy colleges. The New York Times, p. I31.
4.
BloomA. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
5.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
6.
BurrupP. E.BrimleyV.GarfieldR. R. (1988). Financing education in a climate of change. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
CarnevaleA. P.SmithN.StrohlJ. (2013). Postsecondary education and economic opportunity. In PernaL. W. (Eds.), Preparing today’s students for tomorrow’s jobs in metropolitan areas (pp. 93-120). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
ChenW.LiX.St. JohnE. P. (in press). Actionable research for education equity and social justice: Higher education reform in China and beyond. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
DaltonR.St. JohnE. P. (2016). College for every student: An educator’s building college and career skills. New York, NY: Eye on Education/Taylor & Francis.
10.
DruryS. B. (1997). Leo Strauss and the American Right. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
11.
DuderstadtJ. J.WomackF. W. (2003). Beyond the crossroads: The future of the public university in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Fisher v. University of Texas, 133 S. Ct. 2411 (2013).
13.
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).
14.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
15.
HabermasJ. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
16.
HabermasJ. (1987). Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reasoning: Vol. 2. The theory of communicative action (McCarthyT. Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
17.
HabermasJ. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18.
HabermasJ. (1991). The new conservatism: Cultural criticism and the historians’ debate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19.
HalsteadD. K. (1974). Statewide planning in higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
HannonC.FaasD.O’SullivanK. (2017). Widening the educational capabilities of socio-economically disadvantaged students through a model of social and cultural capital development. British Education Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/berj.3309
21.
HansenW. L.WeisbrodB. A. (1967). An income net worth approach to measuring economic welfare. Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.
22.
HearnJ. C. (1993). The paradox of growth in federal aid for college students, 1965-1990. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 9, pp. 94-153). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
23.
HearnJ. C. (1996). Transforming higher education: An organizational perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 141-154.
24.
HearnJ. C.AndersonM. S. (1995). The Minnesota finance experiment. In St. JohnE. P. (Ed.), Rethinking tuition and student aid strategies (New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 89, pp. 5-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
HearnJ. C.LonganeckerD. (1985). Enrollment effects of alternative post-secondary pricing policies. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 485-508.
26.
HellerD. E.MarinP. (Eds.). (2002). Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
27.
HenryM.LingardB.RizviF.TaylorS. (2001). The OECD, globalization and education policy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Pergamon Press.
28.
HoachlanderG. (1997). Organizing mathematics around work. In SteenL. (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 122-136). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
29.
HoffmanN.VargasJ.VeneziaA.MillerM. S. (Eds.). (2007). Minding the gap: Why integrating high school with college makes sense and how to do it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
30.
HosslerD.SchmitJ.VesperN. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
HoxbyC. M.AveryC. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students (Working Paper No. 18586). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18586
32.
LeeE. C.BowenF. M. (1975). Managing multi-campus systems: Effective administration in an unsteady state. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
LevinJ. S.KaterS.WagonerR. L (2006). Community college faculty: At work in the new economy. New York, NY: Palgrave.
34.
McCarthyM.JonesB. A.St. JohnE. P. (March2000). University-based policy research centers (Policy Bulletin No. PB-26). Bloomington, IN: Indiana Education Policy Center.
35.
MeyerH.-D.St. JohnE. P.ChankselianiM.UribeL. (Eds.). (2013). Fairness in access to higher education in a global perspective: Reconciling excellence, efficiency, and justice. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
36.
NussbaumM. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37.
NussbaumM. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
38.
NussbaumM. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belcamp Press.
39.
OrfieldG.MarinP.FloresS. M.GarcesL. (2007). Charting the future of college affirmative action: Legal victories, continuing attacks, and new research (pp. 173-204). Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project, UCLA School of Education.
40.
PasqueP. A. (2010). American higher education, leadership, and policy: Critical issues and the public good. New York, NY: Palgrave.
41.
PerryT.MosesR.WynneJ.DelpitL.CortesE. (Eds.). (2010, Fall). Quality education as a constitutional right: Organizing to create a movement. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
42.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. New York, NY: Belknap Press.
43.
RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choices are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Alfred A Knopf.
45.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
46.
RawlsJ. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
RawlsJ. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
48.
RizviF. (2006). The ideology of privatization in higher education: A global perspective. In PriestD. M.St. JohnE. P. (Eds.), Privatization and public universities (pp. 65-84). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
49.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Press.
50.
SenA. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
51.
SenA.ClappJ. (2000). Development as freedom: Human capability & global need. International Journal, 55(1), 160.
52.
SlaughterS. E. (1991). The official “ideology” of higher education: Ironies and inconsistencies. In TierneyW. G. (Ed.), Culture and ideology in higher education: Advancing a critical agenda (pp. 59-86). New York, NY: Praeger.
53.
SlaughterS. E.LeslieL. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54.
SlaughterS. E.RhoadesG. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
St. JohnE. P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
St. JohnE. P. (2013a). Research, actionable knowledge, and social change: Reclaiming social responsibility through research partnerships. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
57.
St. JohnE. P. (2013b). Tools of state, using research to inform policy decisions in higher education. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 118-144. doi:10.4471/rimcis.2013.17
58.
St. JohnE. P.Affolter-CaineB.ChungA. S. (2007). Race-conscious student financial aid: Constructing an agenda for research, litigation, and policy development. In OrfieldG.MarinP.FloresS. M.GarcesL. (Eds.), Charting the future of college affirmative action: Legal victories, continuing attacks, and new research (pp. 173-204). Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project, UCLA School of Education. Retrieved from http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/affirmativeaction/charting_aa.php
59.
St. JohnE. P.BigelowV. M.LijanaK.MasseJ. (2015). Left Behind: Urban High Schools and the Failed Markets. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
60.
St. JohnE. P.ChungC. G. (2004). Merit and equity: Rethinking award criteria in the Michigan scholarship program. In St. JohnE. P.ParsonsM. D. (Eds.), Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales (pp. 124-140). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
St. JohnE. P.Daun-BarnettN. J.Moronski-ChapmanK. (2013). Public policy and higher education: Reframing strategies for preparation, access, and success. New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
St. JohnE. P.HuS.FisherA. S. (2011). Breaking through the access barrier: Academic capital formation informing public policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
St. JohnE. P.LijanaK.MusobaG. D. (2017). Using action inquiry in engaged research: A professional guide. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
StiglitzJ. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, NY: Norton.
66.
TandbergD. A. (2010). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51, 416-450.
67.
ThelinJ. R. (2011). A history of American higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
68.
TierneyW. G. (2015). Rethinking education and poverty. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
TierneyW. G.CorwinZ. B.ColyarJ. E. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
70.
TrowM. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
71.
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. 518 (1819).
72.
U.S. Department of Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author.
73.
ZumetaW. (2004). State higher education financing: Demand imperatives meet structural, cyclic and political constraints. In ParsonsM. D.St. JohnE. P. (Eds.), Funding for higher education: New contexts and rationales (pp. 79-107). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
