Illicit Market for Counterfeit Products at Small Businesses in Michigan

Abstract

Research on small businesses facilitating illicit markets and the efforts of nonfederal law enforcement agencies to identify these small business offenders has been scant. This exploratory study examines the illicit market for counterfeit products sold through small businesses in the State of Michigan. We used police incident reports of counterfeit products identified during administrative tobacco inspections of small businesses to provide a unique look at this crime problem and the efforts of law enforcement to curtail it. We analyzed the content of these incident reports to explore characteristics of the incidents, businesses and suspects selling counterfeit products, how the counterfeit products were identified and verified, and the origin of the counterfeits. Implications for law enforcement efforts to address counterfeit criminal enterprises and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

product counterfeiting illicit markets small business crime

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

G. W.

Sporn

L. S.

(2002). Trademark counterfeiting. New York, NY: Aspen.

Albanese

J. S.

(2011). Transnational crime and the 21st century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Barlow

H. D.

(1993). From fiddle fingers to networks of collusion. Crime, Law & Social Change, 20, 319-337.

Beare

M. E.

(2007). The devil made me do it: Business partners in crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 14, 34-48.

Beckert

Wehinger

(2012). In the shadow: Illegal markets and economic sociology. Socio-Economic Review, 11, 5-30. doi:10.1093/ser/mws020

Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. (2017). The problem analysis triangle. Retrieved from http://www.popcenter.org/about/?p=triangle

Chaudhry

P. E.

Zimmerman

(2009). The economics of counterfeit trade: Governments, consumers, pirates and intellectual property rights. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Chaudhry

P. E.

Zimmerman

(2013). Protecting your intellectual property rights: Understanding the role of management, governments, consumers and pirates. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Corbin

Strauss

(1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.

10.

Crichlow

V. J.

(2014). Small business owners in Detroit: An assessment of procedural justice and police legitimacy perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.

11.

Croall

(2003). Combating financial crime: Regulatory versus crime control approaches. Journal of Financial Crime, 11, 45-55.

12.

Felson

Boba

(2010). Crime and everyday life (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Felson

Clarke

R. V.

(1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. London, England: Research, Development, and Statistics Directorate, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office.

14.

Gottschalk

(2008). Stages of financial crime by business organizations. Journal of Financial Crime, 15, 38-48.

15.

Heinonen

J. A.

Wilson

J. M.

(2012). Product counterfeiting at the state level: An empirical examination of Michigan-related incidents. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36, 273-290. doi:10.1080/01924036.2012.721198

16.

Hollis

M. E.

Wilson

J. M.

(2014). Who are the guardians in product counterfeiting? A theoretical application of routine activities theory. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 16, 169-188.

17.

International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition. (2005). The negative consequences of international intellectual property theft. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.iccwbo.org/Data/Documents/Bascap/Why-enforce/Links-to-organized-crime/The-Negative-Consequences-of-International-Intellectual-Property-Theft/

18.

Johns

Hayes

(2003). Behind the fence: Buying and selling stolen merchandise. Security Journal, 16(4), 29-44.

19.

Manley

L. L.

Wiid

J. A.

Cant

M. C.

(2015). Attitudes of small business owners towards counterfeit merchandise: Ethics or survival? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(4), 48-59.

20.

OECD. (2008). The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/38707619.pdf

21.

OECD, & EUIPO. (2016). Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods: Mapping the economic impact. Paris, France: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/4216071e.pdf?expires=1461263003&id=id&accname=ocid177642&checksum=372247FB8F85E6A7097594030D5FB676

22.

Phillips

(2005). Knockoff: the deadly trade in counterfeit goods. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page.

23.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2013). Counterfeit goods in the UK: Who is buying what, and why? London, England: Author. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.co.uk/en_UK/uk/assets/pdf/anti-counterfeiting-consumer-survey-october-2013.pdf

24.

Punch

(1996). Dirty business: Exploring corporate misconduct. London, England: Sage.

25.

Rapley

(2010). Some pragmatics of qualitative data analysis. In Silverman

(Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 273-290). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

26.

Satchwell

(2004). A sick business: counterfeit medicines and organised crime. London, England: The Stockholm Network.

27.

Smith

(2016). Of bad-seed, black-sheep and prodigal-sons: Profiling crime and enterprise in a small-business-community. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22, 39-62. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-04-2014-0059

28.

Spink

Heinonen

J. A.

(2012). Product counterfeiting in Michigan and the expectations and priorities for state and local law enforcement: Assessing the awareness of and response to the problem. A-CAPP Backgrounder Series. East Lansing: Michigan State University Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection. Retrieved from http://a-capp.msu.edu/sites/default/files/files/Spink_StateEnforcement.pdf

29.

Stern

(1985). Speech on foreign counterfeiting. Presented at the National Conference on Counterfeiting, Washington, DC.

30.

Sullivan

B. A.

Wilson

J. M.

(2017). An empirical examination of product counterfeiting crime impacting the U.S. military. Trends in Organized Crime. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s12117-017-9306-7

31.

Sullivan

B. A.

Wilson

J. M.

Kinghorn

(2017). Partnerships and the battle against product counterfeits. A-CAPP Backgrounder Series. East Lansing: Michigan State University Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection. Retrieved from http://a-capp.msu.edu/sites/default/files/Partnerships%20FINAL.pdf

32.

Sutton

Johnston

Lockwood

(1998). Handling stolen goods and theft: A market reduction approach. London, England: British Home Office Research Publications.

33.

Tchoukaleyska

(2016). Illicit mint and unregulated vendors: Constructing illegality in French public spaces. Area, 47, 81-87.

34.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (2017). Intellectual property rights seizure statistics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.cbp.gov/trade/priority-issues/ipr/statistics

35.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Intellectual property: Observations on efforts to quantify the economic effects of counterfeit and pirated goods. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf

36.

United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. (2003). Global counterfeiting: Background document. Turin, Italy: Author. Retrieved from http://counterfeiting.unicri.it/docs/Globalcounterfeitingbackground.pdf

37.

United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. (2007). Counterfeiting: A global spread, a global threat. Turin, Italy: Author. Retrieved from http://www.unicri.it/news/article/0712-3_counterfeiting_crt_foundation

38.

Vagg

Harris

(2000). False profits: Why product counterfeiting is increasing. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), 107-115.

39.

Wilson

J. M.

(2015). Brand protection 2020: Perspectives on the issues shaping the global risk and response to product counterfeiting. A-CAPP Paper Series. East Lansing: Michigan State University Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection. Retrieved from: http://a-capp.msu.edu/sites/default/files/BP2020_FINAL.pdf

40.

Wilson

J. M.

Fenoff

(2014). Distinguishing counterfeit from authentic product retailers in the virtual marketplace. International Criminal Justice Review, 24, 39-58. doi:10.1177/1057567714527390

41.

Wilson

J. M.

Sullivan

B. A.

(2016). Brand owner approaches to assessing the risk of product counterfeiting. Journal of Brand Management, 23, 327-344. doi:10.1057/bm.2016.10

42.

Wilson

J. M.

Sullivan

B. A.

Hollis

M. E.

(2016). Measuring the “unmeasurable”: Approaches to assessing the nature and extent of product counterfeiting. International Criminal Justice Review, 26, 259-276. doi:10.1177/1057567716644766