This article seeks to showcase the previously underexplored theoretical potential of the recent “sub-national turn” in comparative politics. Specifically, I hope to delineate how theories derived to explain variation in an outcome across sub-national units can enrich our repertoire of theories to explain variation in the same and/or related outcomes across national units. I show the potential of this method of theory generation through an analysis of social welfare, a specially apposite outcome for this purpose because it has been studied rigorously at the both the national and sub-national levels of analyses. I argue that sub-national analyses can, on the one hand, help us refine and rethink national-level theories for the same outcomes. They can push us to nuance and extend established national theories and show us how the same variables and mechanisms that have been hypothesized to explain cross-country variations might work differently, even in opposite directions, within countries. On the other hand, sub-national analyses can push us past the established repertoire of national-level explanations to bring to light new (or forgotten) theories. In this way, this article seeks to challenge cross-country analyses as the exclusive domain of theory building in comparative politics.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonS. A. (2003). Botswana: An African success story. In RodrikD. (Ed.), Search of prosperity (pp. 80-119). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A. (2006). Economic origins of democracy and dictatorship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AlesinaA.BaqirR.EasterlyW. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1243-1284.
4.
AlesinaA.GlaeserE. L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
AlesinaA.GlaeserE.SacerdoteB. (2001). Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare system? (Working Paper No. w8524). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
AlmondG. A.VerbaS. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
ArceM. (2014). Resource extraction and protest in Peru. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8.
BantingK.KymlickaW. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9.
BantingK. G.JohnstonR.KymlickaW.SorokaS. (2006). Do multiculturalism policies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis. In BantingK. G.KymlickaW. (Eds.), Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies (pp. 49-91). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
BardhanP. (2000). Irrigation and cooperation: An empirical analysis of 48 irrigation communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 847-865.
11.
BarrilleauxC. (1997). A test of the independent influences of electoral competition and party strength in a model of state policy-making. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 1462-1466.
12.
BatesR. H. (2008). When things fell apart. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BehrendJ. (2011). The unevenness of democracy at the sub-national level: Provincial closed games in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 46, 150-176.
14.
BeissingerM. R. (2009). Nationalism and the collapse of Soviet communism. Contemporary European History, 18, 331-347.
15.
BesleyT.KudamatsuM. (2006). Health and democracy. American Economic Review, 96, 313-318.
16.
BoehmkeF.BrantonR. P. (2014). Sub-national politics: A methodological perspective. In Haider-MarkelD. P. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of state and local government (pp. 855- 877). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
BoixC. (2001). Democracy, development, and the public sector. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 1-17.
18.
BoixC. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19.
BoixC.StokesS. C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55, 517-549.
20.
BoustanL. P. (2010). Was postwar suburbanization “white flight”? Evidence from the black migration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 417-443.
21.
BrownD.HunterW. (2004). Democracy and human capital formation: Education spending in Latin America 1980–1997. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1283-1289.
22.
BrownD. S.MobarakA. M. (2009). The transforming power of democracy: Regime type and the distribution of electricity. American Political Science Review, 103, 193-213.
23.
BurkeV. (1985). Guns or butter? War and the making of the welfare state. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
CarminesE. G. (1974). The mediating influence of state legislatures on the linkage between interparty competition and welfare policies. American Political Science Review, 68, 1118-1124.
25.
CarruthersB. G. (1993). Gender, states, and social policies: Skocpol’s view. Law & Social Inquiry, 18, 671-688.
26.
CastlesF. G.1978. The social democratic image of society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
CatesJ. R. (1983). Insuring inequality: Administrative leadership in social security, 1935-1954. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28.
CentenoM. A. (2002). Blood and debt: War and the nation-state in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
29.
ChhibberP.NooruddinI. (2004). Do party systems count? The number of parties and government performance in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 152-187.
30.
ClearyM. R. (2007). Electoral competition, participation, and government responsiveness in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 283-299.
31.
CollierD.MessickR. E. (1975). Prerequisites versus diffusion: Testing alternative explanations of social security adoption. American Political Science Review, 69, 1299-1315.
32.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (1998). On the economic causes of war. Oxford Economic Papers, 50, 563-573.
33.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (1999). Justice-seeking and loot-seeking in Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank.
34.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (2001). Greed and grievance in civil war (Policy Research Working Paper WPS 2355). Washington, DC: World Bank.
35.
DahlR. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
DalyS. Z. (2016). Organized violence after civil war: The geography of recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
DawsonR. E.RobinsonJ. A. (1963). Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states. Journal of Politics, 25, 265-289.
38.
DerthickM. (1979). Policymaking for social security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39.
DyeT. R. (1966). Politics, economics, and the public: Political outcomes in the American states. Chicago, IL: Rand, McNally.
40.
EasterlyW.LevineR. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203-1250.
41.
EatonK. (2004). Politics beyond the capital: The design of sub-national institutions in South America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
Esping-AndersenG. (2013). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
43.
EvansP. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
EvansP. B. (1989). Predatory, developmental and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociological Forum, 4(4), 561-587.
45.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75-90.
46.
FilmerD. (2003). The incidence of public expenditures on health and education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
47.
FloraP.AlberJ. (1981). Modernization, democratization and the development of welfare states in Western Europe. In FloraP.HeidenheimerA. J. (Eds.), The development of welfare states in Europe and America (pp. 37-80). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
48.
FoaR. (2016). Ancient polities, modern states (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.
49.
ForanJ. (2005). Taking power: On the origins of third world revolutions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50.
FurnissN.TiltonT. A. (1977). The case for the welfare state: From social security to social equality (Vol. 230). Offaly, Ireland: Midland Books.
51.
GaoE. (2016). Tribal mobilization, fragmented groups, and public goods provision in Jordan. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 1372-1403.
52.
GarfiasF. (2015). Elite competition and state capacity development: Theory and evidence from post-revolutionary Mexico (Working paper). University of California San Diego.
53.
GerringJ.ThackerS. C. (2008). A centripetal theory of democratic governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54.
GerringJ.ThackerS. C.AlfaroR. (2012). Democracy and human development. Journal of Politics, 74(1), 1-17.
55.
GerringJ.ThackerS. C.LuY.HuangW. (2015). Does diversity impair human development? A multi-level test of the diversity debit hypothesis. World Development, 66, 166-188.
56.
GervasoniC. (2010). A rentier theory of sub-national regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics, 62, 302-340.
57.
GibsonE. L. (2005). Boundary control: Sub-national authoritarianism in democratic countries. World Politics, 58, 101-132.
58.
GilensM. (2009). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
GiraudyA. (2010). The politics of sub-national undemocratic regime reproduction in Argentina and Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(2), 53-84.
60.
GlennersterR.MiguelE.RothenbergA. D. (2013). Collective action in diverse Sierra Leone communities. Economic Journal, 123, 285-316.
GoodwinJ. (2003). The renewal of socialism and the decline of revolution. In ForanJ. (Ed.), The future of revolutions (pp. 59-72). New York, NY: Zed Books.
63.
GrindleM. (2007). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
64.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. London, England: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
65.
HagopianF. (1996). Traditional politics and regime change in Brazil. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
66.
HecloH. H. (1972). Policy analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 83-108.
67.
HellerP. (1999). The labor of development: Workers and the transformation of capitalism in Kerala, India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
68.
HerbstJ. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
HerreraY. M. (2007). Imagined economies: The sources of Russian regionalism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70.
HerringR. J. (1983). Land to the tiller: The political economy of Agrarian reform in South Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71.
HibbsD. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71, 1467-1487.
72.
HicksA. M.SwankD. H. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960-82. American Political Science Review, 86, 658-674.
73.
HirschmanA. O. (1963). Journeys toward progress: Studies in economic policy-making in Latin America. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
74.
HiskeyJ. T. (2003). Demand-based development and local electoral environments in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 41-59.
75.
HopkinsD. J. (2011). The limited local impacts of ethnic and racial diversity. American Politics Research, 39, 344-379.
76.
HuangX. (2015). Four worlds of welfare: Understanding sub-national variation in Chinese social health insurance. China Quarterly, 222, 449-474.
77.
HuberE.RaginC.StephensJ. D. (1993). Social democracy, christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 711-749.
78.
HuberJ. D.McCartyN. (2004). Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 481-494.
79.
HuberE.StephensJ. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). The bases of accommodation. Foreign Affairs, 46, 642-656.
81.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12-34.
82.
ImmergutE. M. (1990). Institutions, veto points, and policy results: A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy, 10, 391-416.
83.
InglehartR. (1988). The renaissance of political culture. American Political Science Review, 82, 1203-1230.
IngramM. C. (2016). Mandates, geography, and networks: Diffusion of criminal procedure reform in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(1), 121-145.
86.
IversenT.SoskiceD. (2009). Distribution and redistribution: The shadow of the nineteenth century. World Politics, 61(3), 438-486.
87.
JänttiM.JaynesG.RoemerJ. E. (2014). The double role of ethnic heterogeneity in explaining welfare-state generosity (Discussion Paper No. 1972). New Haven, CT: Cowles Foundation.
88.
JohnstonR.BantingK.KymlickaW.SorokaS. (2010). National identity and support for the welfare state. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43, 349-377.
89.
KaergardN. (2006, August). The foundation for the Danish welfare state: Ethnic, religious and linguistic harmony. Paper prepared for the XIV International Economic History Congress (Session 22). Helsinki, Finland.
90.
KauneckisD.AnderssonK. (2009). Making decentralization work: A cross-national examination of local governments and natural resource governance in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(1), 23-46.
91.
KeyV. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf
92.
KhwajaA. I. (2009). Can good projects succeed in bad communities?Journal of Public Economics, 93, 899-916.
93.
KohliA. (1987). The state and poverty in India: The politics of reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
94.
KohliA. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
95.
KorpiW. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London, England: Routledge.
96.
LakeD. A.BaumM. A. (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 587-621.
97.
LevitskyS.WayL. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
98.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.
99.
LipsetS. M.RokkanS. (Eds.). (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (Vol. 7). New York, NY: Free Press.
100.
LockardD. (1968). Toward equal opportunity: A study of state and local antidiscrimination laws. New York, NY: Macmillan.
101.
MagaloniB. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 715-741.
102.
ManglaA. (2015). Bureaucratic norms and state capacity in India. Asian Survey, 55, 882-908.
103.
ManionM. (2006). Democracy, community, trust: The impact of elections in rural China. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 301-324.
104.
MannM. (1986). The sources of social power (Vols. 1 and 2). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
105.
MaresI.CarnesM. E. (2009). Social policy in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 93-113.
106.
MarxA. W. (1998). Making race and nation: A comparison of South Africa, the United States and Brazil. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
107.
McEwenN.ParryR. (2005). Devolution and the preservation of the United Kingdom welfare state. In McEwenN.MorenoL. (Eds.), The territorial politics of welfare (pp. 41-61). London, England: Routledge.
108.
McMannK. M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy: Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
109.
MigdalJ. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
110.
MiguelE. (2004). Tribe or nation? Nation building and public goods in Kenya versus Tanzania. World Politics, 56, 328-362.
111.
MiguelE.GugertyM. K. (2005). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 2325-2368.
112.
MirzaR. A. (2014). Occupation, diversity and public goods: Evidence from Pakistan through partition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.
113.
MontinolaG.QianY.WeingastB. R. (1995). Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48, 50-81.
114.
MooreB. (1966). Social origins of democracy and dictatorship. Boston, MA: Beacon.
115.
MorenoC. (2005). Decentralization, electoral competition, and local government performance in Mexico. PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Texas, Austin.
116.
MulliganC. B.GilR.Sala-i-MartinX. X. (2010). Social security and democracy. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(1), 1-27.
117.
MuraliK. (2017). Caste, class and capital. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
118.
NoakesL.PattinsonJ. (Eds.). (2013). British cultural memory and the Second World War. London, England: Bloomsbury.
119.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
120.
OiJ. C. (1999). Rural China takes off: Institutional foundations of economic reform. Berkeley: University of California Press.
121.
OlsonM. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567-576.
122.
PampelF. C.WilliamsonJ. B. (1989). Age, class, politics, and the welfare state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
123.
ParsonsT. (1951). Social system. London, England: Routledge.
124.
PerssonA. (2012, May). State-building in ethnically diverse societies. Paper presented at the workshop, “Building State Capacity: The Other Side of Political Development,” Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
125.
PiersonP. (1995). Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance, 8, 449-478.
126.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
127.
QuadagnoJ. (1987). Theories of the welfare state. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 109-128.
128.
QuadagnoJ. S. (1996). The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
129.
RebolledoJ. (2011). Black sheep of the family: A model of sub-national authoritarian endurance in national democracies (Unpublished manuscript), Yale University.
130.
RemmerK. L.WibbelsE. (2000). The sub-national politics of economic adjustment: Provincial politics and fiscal performance in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 419-451.
131.
RoddenJ. (2006). Hamilton’s paradox: The promise and peril of fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
132.
RodrikD.SubramanianA.TrebbiF. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165.
133.
RothsteinB. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
134.
RughJ. S.TrounstineJ. (2011). The provision of local public goods in diverse communities: Analyzing municipal bond elections. Journal of Politics, 73, 1038-1050.
135.
SchicklerE. (2016). Racial realignment: The transformation of American Liberalism, 1932-1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
136.
ShalevM. (1983). The social democratic model and beyond: Two generations of comparative research on the welfare state. Comparative Social Research, 6, 315-551.
137.
ShandraJ. M.LondonB.WhooleyO. P.WilliamsonJ. B. (2004). International nongovernmental organizations and carbon dioxide emissions in the developing world: A quantitative, cross-national analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 520-545.
138.
SharkanskyI. (1968). Spending in the American states. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
139.
SharkanskyI.HofferbertR. I. (1969). Dimensions of state politics, economics, and public policy. American Political Science Review, 63, 867-879.
140.
SinghP. (2011). We-ness and welfare: A longitudinal analysis of social development in Kerala, India. World Development, 39, 282-293.
141.
SinghP. (2015). Subnationalism and social development: A comparative analysis of Indian states. World Politics, 67(3), 506-562.
142.
SinghP. (2016). How solidarity works for welfare: Sub-nationalism and social development in India. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
143.
SinghP.vom HauM. (2016). Ethnicity in time: Politics, history, and the relationship between ethnic diversity and public goods provision. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 1303-1340. doi:10.1177/0010414016633231
144.
SinhaA. (2005). The regional roots of developmental politics in India: A divided leviathan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
145.
SkocpolT. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
146.
SkocpolT. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States: Future possibilities in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
147.
SkocpolT. (1995). Social policy in the United States: Future possibilities in historical perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
148.
SkocpolT.AmentaE. (1986). States and social policies. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 131-157.
149.
SkocpolT.FinegoldK. (1982). State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal. Political Science Quarterly, 97, 255-278.
150.
SleemanJ. F. (1973). The welfare state: Its aims, benefits and costs (Vol. 116). London: G. Allen & Unwin.
151.
SmelserN. J.LipsetS. M. (Eds.). (1966). Social structure and mobility in economic development. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
152.
SnyderR. (2001). Scaling down: The sub-national comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 93-110.
153.
Taylor-GoobyP. (2005a). Is the future American? Or, can left politics preserve European welfare states from erosion through growing “racial” diversity?Journal of Social Policy, 34, 661-672.
154.
Taylor-GoobyP. (2005b). Uncertainty, trust and pensions: The case of the current UK reforms. Social Policy & Administration, 39, 217-232.
155.
Taylor-GoobyP. (Ed.). (2005c). Ideas and welfare state reform in Western Europe. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
156.
ThiesC. G. (2005). War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 451-465.
157.
TillyC. (1973). Does modernization breed revolution?Comparative Politics, 5, 425-447.
158.
TillyC. (1985). War-making and state-making as organized crime. In EvansP. B.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 169-191). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
159.
TitmussR. (1958). War and social policy. Essays on the “Welfare State.”London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
160.
TransueJ. E. (2007). Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 78-91.
161.
TrounstineJ. (2013). One for you, two for me: Support for public goods investment in diverse communities. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Merced.
162.
TsaiL. L. (2007). Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review, 101, 355-372.
163.
TudorM. (2013). The promise of power: The origins of democracy in India and autocracy in Pakistan. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
164.
TudorM.ZiegfeldA. (2016). Sub-national democratization in India: The role of colonial competition and central intervention. In BehrendJ.WhiteheadL. (Eds.), Illiberal practices: Territorial variance within large federal democracies (pp. 49-88). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
165.
van OorschotW.ArtsW.GelissenJ. (2006). Social capital in Europe: Measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociologica, 49, 149-167.
166.
VarshneyA. (2001). Ethnic conflict and civil society: India and beyond. World Politics, 53, 362-398.
167.
VarshneyA. (2003). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
168.
WangS.YaoY. (2007). Grassroots democracy and local governance: Evidence from rural China. World Development, 35, 1635-1649.
169.
WeberM. (1948). Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
170.
WeingastB. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of the law. American Political Science Review, 91(2), 245-263.
171.
WilenskyH. L. (1974). The welfare state and equality: structural and ideological roots of public expenditures (Vol. 140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
172.
WilkinsonS. I. (2006). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
173.
WolfeA.KlausenJ. (2000, December). Other peoples. Prospect, 28-33.
174.
WoodE. J. (2001). An insurgent path to democracy: popular mobilization, economic interests, and regime transition in South Africa and El Salvador. Comparative Political Studies, 34(8), 862-888.
175.
ZiblattD. (2006). Structuring the state: the formation of Italy and Germany and the puzzle of federalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
176.
ZiblattD. (2008). Why some cities provide more public goods than others: A sub-national comparison of the provision of public goods in German cities in 1912. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43, 273-289.
